Water Privatization Argumentative Essay

In recent discussions of the water crises of Flint, MI, a controversial issue has been a decision whether water privatization or public utilities are better for the well-being. The people in Flint, MI have experienced an extreme discomfort of the over excessive amount of lead in their own homes. In fact, Elected officials have denied for over a year that the city's water was contaminated with lead, however, they finally admitted that the water wasn't safe in September 2015. CNN News reports that Mayor Dayne Walling and other city leaders publicly "pretended" to drink the Flint water to show that it is safe. The importance of water for the people sheds light on the pros and cons of both water privatization and public utilities. On the one hand, water privatization is one of the safer and consistent choices for the citizens of the United States. In addition, proponents for water privatizations advocate that the quality is more purified and accessible. Unlike Flint who has lead infected water, water privatization will allow them …show more content…
The weaker countries are in a difficult position to refuse towards water privatization, which then leads them to fail to pay their debts. They also indicate that private financing costs more than public financing and taxpayers will end up paying for the water privatization through their monthly bills. In addition, they state "As a result, consumers are also forced to make these higher payments on company loans." According to the political cartoons, it shows the negative impacts of water privatization and what happens to the public utilities. The political cartoon displays a man who is a part of the water privatization company manipulating the consumers into buying the water instead of using the public utility. This demonstrates how the water companies are cheating the people off making a