According to Wikipedia, “a promise is a commitment by someone to do or not do something” When people make promises to us, we expect them to keep or fulfill them. Likewise, when we make promise to people, there is an expectation to fulfil it.
Obviously, I think the government should enforce both written and unwritten promises made between individuals, and corporation alike. The case of Locke, Clint Eastwood, and Warner Bros. is a typical example of cases government should enforce. In my consideration, Warner Bros. aided Eastwood in his nefarious activity on Locke while at the sometimes, Warner Bros was actually frustrating the career of Locke. Emotionally, Locke suffered tremendously from a broken relationship of a long time standing and then, her career prospect was being jeopardized by Warner Bros. under the influence of Clint Eastwood. Amazingly, Locke lost the case in trial, and the appeal court use words that astound me beyond imagination when in its judgment …show more content…
were not appropriate for judicial review, acting in bad faith by refusing to consider the merits of Locke’s proposals was a matter for the courts”. Lau and Johnson (2011, p.102). The court ought to find it appropriate to review the “creative decision” of Warner Bros. because emotion is being tampered with when a third party comes between people, with the intention of resolving dispute when in reality aiding and abetting the action of another party. Similarly, I think the government should enforce performance in contract. This will boost the confidence of offeree in entering contracts and agreement. I have had a terrible experience with a company who fired or terminated my appointment two
Obviously, I think the government should enforce both written and unwritten promises made between individuals, and corporation alike. The case of Locke, Clint Eastwood, and Warner Bros. is a typical example of cases government should enforce. In my consideration, Warner Bros. aided Eastwood in his nefarious activity on Locke while at the sometimes, Warner Bros was actually frustrating the career of Locke. Emotionally, Locke suffered tremendously from a broken relationship of a long time standing and then, her career prospect was being jeopardized by Warner Bros. under the influence of Clint Eastwood. Amazingly, Locke lost the case in trial, and the appeal court use words that astound me beyond imagination when in its judgment …show more content…
were not appropriate for judicial review, acting in bad faith by refusing to consider the merits of Locke’s proposals was a matter for the courts”. Lau and Johnson (2011, p.102). The court ought to find it appropriate to review the “creative decision” of Warner Bros. because emotion is being tampered with when a third party comes between people, with the intention of resolving dispute when in reality aiding and abetting the action of another party. Similarly, I think the government should enforce performance in contract. This will boost the confidence of offeree in entering contracts and agreement. I have had a terrible experience with a company who fired or terminated my appointment two