Marx's Theory Of Commodity

Improved Essays
Marx explained in chapter one what a commodity was and the difference between exchange value and use value. A commodity is used to in order exchange for another commodity, therefore keeping trade and the labor force alive. As Marx would say “A means to an end”. Marx says “commodities must be realized as values before they can be realized as use values” (179) which further supports his point. Then they split off into either use value or exchange value which separate the commodities.
One must realize that people who build these objects do not find these objects useful, only in the sense that they are useful to other people that may be buying or trading with them. Even if they do not see that their commodity has use value, they always have to
…show more content…
With a commodity this is where the priniciple of value emerges from which then goes hand and hand with value. Each person that produces some sort of comodity has the end goal of selling the product to someone that has use for it. As people do this they would need a baseline for how to value these comodities. This is where the basic concept of money would arise. Money is a simple universal way to establish the value of a commodity before it is sold. With the concept of money now in the picture one does not simply have to just trade a commodity for another commodity, they can get money in exchange to go buy something else. This makes it a lot easier for the individual that made the product to establish a value for his or her product that he or she …show more content…
So in short, there has to be an equal amount of money out there for how much value there is out there in commodities. The value put on money is essential in understanding because as Marx explains it the concept in the book, it will help us to understand the concept of inflation. Another interesting point that is brought up is the idea of a means of payment. Marx points out in the reading that “means of payment”, acting as a promise by the buyer to pay in the future. “He, therefore, buys it before he pays for it. The seller sells an existing commodity, the buyer buys as the mere representative of money, or rather as the representative of future money. The seller becomes a creditor, the buyer becomes a debtor.”

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The lack of a viable currency in colonial New England is apparent, as is the restriction of trade due to the lack of monies. While an abundant supply of specie could have remedied this problem it lacked the ability to create more money in the way that colonial paper bills did. Marx’s generalized system will be used to demonstrate the process in which this occurred. Marx’s generalized system, which can be represented as m-m-c…p…c’-m’-m’’.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lydians Use Of Money

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first use of money was processed in 700 B.C. The Lydians were the very first culture to value a specific material and call it a “coin.” Soon after the Lydians invented what we know as money, other cultures around the world began to mint their own coins with certain values. The whole world eventually heard about this new creation. It was easier to trade goods, get items, and it brought people into thought of making businesses.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Verizon Case Study

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the past years, Verizon laid off thousands of workers, including those who worked for the company for years, and did not replace them. For almost a year Verizon has been trying to renegotiate terms with the communications workers of America union. Workers are concerned about their job knowing that it isn’t safe anymore. Employees are without contracts, according to union officials and workers, and as Verizon stands firmly with “corporate greed”, a strike was the only option left. This strike may strike a fuse for other unions to use related maneuvers to get what they want.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This German philosopher was in the midst of many revolutions throughout his time. At one point, he was known as the spokesman of the ‘Communist Party’ in 1848, which signifies the kind of involvement he was intervened within at the time. Although Marx was a member of a wealthy family in which he utilized to acquire good education, he was a philosopher who critiqued capitalism. Marx attacks the bourgeoisie families and individuals who happened to be property owners or factory occupants, and critiqued these families and individuals because he believed as property owners; they would need to hire people in order to operate the property. His idea of discarding the middle class was revealed in the third idea of his book The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is a tool that is used for a purpose: to get what you want. Money is also used to pay for debt. When the U.S. or even an individual borrows money from another country or someone else, they are required to pay the money back. The power of the piece of paper acts as the backbone to the economy.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word “money” suggests a medium of exchange in the form of paper and metal coins. This money solely has materialistic…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx was born the Prussian city of Trier in 1818. Although his family converted to Christianity due to the antiemetic laws of Prussia, they were originally a German Jewish family. Much like Hegel before him, Marx saw reality as an ongoing process of history. For Marx that history was a history of class conflict. His conclusion was not only relevant in his time, but it is still relevant today.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It factors into our choices such as careers (a topic in which Crawford goes more in depth into), or where we live. We need it to buy the basic supplies to survive such as food and water. It’s no wonder whenever you turn on the news the topic of discussion is most likely money, it’s present everywhere in our lives. Though when we step back and analyze the situation, we have to question, is that a good thing? This is one of the questions Sandel purposes in his essay.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the early centuries people were using the barter system to fulfill their needs. For example, they were exchanging tangible goods such as livestock and other things. Barter system was replaced by a different system, monetization system that could help people to use the money anywhere they traveled. Money gave people more freedom compare to the barter system, because it was not based on need. For example, in the barter system if you had sugar and wanted to buy livestock with it, only the person who needed sugar and had livestock would be dealing with you.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I picture money as unity. If a nation works together, they can achieve the unthinkable. If a nation breaks down and fails together they achieve nothing. Money bring people together or it can tear people apart, that is for the human race to…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Marx and Marcel Mauss were particularly attentive to this feature. They were aware of how the fetishism of money, its apparent ability to render all items comparable, fuels inequality. It is not the process of exchange in itself that renders things equal. Rather it is the reduction in exchange to an abstract common unit. This supposed one dimensionality of value posits that all things can be assessed by a total of said units, such that their reasons for existence must be justified accordingly.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    commodity’ Andrej Rus differentiates between the terms commodity –exchange and non-commodity (gift) exchange through an anthropological perspective. Rus defines commodity-exchange as an exchange of impersonal, alienable, with an economic value that is not subordinated and anonymous items that takes place between strangers that does not require lasting social obligation or personal relationship between the exchangers. Mauss made a distinction between commodities and gifts based on Karl Marx’s work whereby he defines non-commodity (gift) exchange as an “exchange of inalienable things between transactors who are in a state of reciprocal dependence”. A gift being affiliated with the elements of the embodiment of sentiment, non-monetary and utility based, free and unconstrained; a gift is questionable on whether or not it is…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now a person is guaranteed payment in a market system for a good they produce. Reciprocity is much lower and redistribution is unheard in a perfectly capitalist market system. In a market economy, goods are produced solely for profit. If there is no demand, they will not be produced. This new ability to and societal acceptance of making money solely because a person wants to and not because he needs to is the reason for all of the innovation within the last few centuries.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx Wage Labour Analysis

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What is Marx’s concept of ‘Wage Labour’ and the relationship of the worker to the capitalist, as he describes it in ‘Wage Labour and Capital’? I believe that Marx’s concept on ‘Wage Labour’ is the amount of value received in the work that was carried out. The wage that is given to the worker is the amount of money that is paid by the capitalist who is the boss, who then gives that money to the labourers which are the workers. Marx explains the key concepts of a ‘Wage’ and he also compares the difference between the labourer and a capitalist. Marx also questions the realistic activity, by informing us about the power of current working class, and also the capitalist and the possessor.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I’m sure that you have heard about the chaos enveloping us here in France. I know that rumors have been spreading about the demise of the upper and middle classes and that you must be worried about our safety. I should assure you that we are in no current danger from the revolutionaries here. In fact, I believe that if these revolutions are successful, they will continue to spread much-needed change against the nobility while eventually giving way to more moderate policies that will help us in the long term. If the revolutions in France and Germany succeed, economic liberalism and its proponents will eventually dominate Europe’s political and financial systems.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays