Utilitarianism Vs Deontology

Moral theories are meant to help the people of this world figure out what is right or wrong, since there is no universal law that states such basic necessities. Utilitarianism is one of those moral theories, and it can be defined as a form of consequentialism, which states that the consequence of any action are the standards of right and wrong. The downfall to this theory is that it can be seen as impractical and not holding justice as a factor. Another moral theory is virtue ethics. Virtue ethics focuses on the moral quality of individuals rather than their actions. A major concern with the theory is different individuals and cultures often have massively different opinions on what institutes a virtue. Some people counter-argue that any trait defined as a virtue must be universally held as a virtue for all people in all times. …show more content…
The theory states we are morally obligated to act in agreement with a certain set of principles and rules regardless of outcome. Deontology can be considered superior to utilitarianism and virtue ethics since deontology can be applied to the different laws installed by a country, culture, or even an individual since it’s the actions that are take into consideration. A notable difference between utilitarianism and deontology is that utilitarianism aims at a goal of achieving the greatest happiness and justifies any act that accomplishes that goal of happiness. Deontological theories states that some acts are always wrong, even if the act leads to a good result. This is why deontology is considered superior to virtue ethics and