Utilitarianism And Animal Rights Essay

Improved Essays
One of the major theories in philosophy is utilitarianism, which strives for producing the most amount of happiness. The utilitarian approach is based on the simple doctrine that if an action is ethical and it brings happiness to an individual or a group of people without causing pain, then it is acceptable. One of the main emphasis of utilitarianism is animal rights. It primarily focuses on the treatment of animals and how they should be treated more humanely. The paper will discuss utilitarian’s beliefs and whether they require people to stop eating animals and experimenting on them. The classical utilitarian, Jeremy Bentham, argued that the main principle of utility is that we must generate the most happiness and the least unhappiness …show more content…
Suffering the animal only causes unhappiness. They believe that animals should be treated just like humans. If they are able to feel pain or pleasure like humans, than they should receive similar treatment. In sum, they highly encourage that we ought to care for any creature that feels pain or pleasure (Rachels, 2015). Furthermore, utilitarian’s say humans should either become vegetarian or treat the animals as humans before killing them (Rachels, 2015). If this were to be practiced then it would be acceptable and justified to eat animal meat. But, as long as humans continue to mistreat animals before killing or experimenting on them, utilitarian’s will not condone this. Utilitarian’s require humans to treat the animals like human’s and if they fail to do this then we should not use them to experiment on or to kill and eat. This is a positive aspect to the theory because we take animals for granted. Some animals are our companions, or they simply bring us happiness in different ways. They are able to feel pain just as us humans do, thus, making it immoral to treat them critically. This theory positively promotes the awareness of animal rights and welfare. We ought to consider the animals needs before concluding our own happiness as they are the ones that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This field of study is able to provide arguments about the ethical treatments of animals through the realization that animal emotions exist. Ethics is able to focus on the well being of animals and shift from anthropocentrism. By realizing the relation between cognitive ethology, animal emotions and ethics, humans are no longer seen as superior over animals because they are regarded as similar to them. Cognitive ethology and animal emotions allow ethics to “ enrich our views of other animals” as well as “ change how we do science” (Bekoff, 2007,p. 22-23).…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore my objections are rooted in an ideal that animals in nature deserve a different level of respect than those that are raised for food. These are the situations that bring rise to ethics, the discussion of ethics,…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Your grandfather’s Alzheimer’s has progressed to such a degree that his mental capabilities are no more than those of a lab rat. Scientists are in need of test subjects, so your grandpa is shipped off to a facility where they test unregulated amounts of drugs, makeup, and shampoos on him. R. G. Frey uses this example of testing on cognitively impaired humans throughout his piece, “Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism.”. This paper will outline Frey’s arguments on why human life generally has more value than animal life and highlight the exceptions to the rule that justify the mentioned scenario, while also presenting objections to the unequal value thesis and evaluating those oppositions with respect to humans with cognitive disabilities…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the article “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin argues that animals should be treated humanely because, according to science, the differences between animals and humans are less than what we think. He believes that animals should be given the rights that protect them from inhumane treatment and human consumption. He is telling us that we have to give them the same rights that a human possesses. In affirmation to Jeremy Rifkin, we should treat animals humanely because they also have a heart that can feel pain and a brain that can think.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer argues that it is morally unjustifiable to kill and eat animals for our own pleasure and as food. I personally agree with Singer’s argument that it is wrong to kill other species, using them merely as a means to our end because I firmly believe that their interests in not suffering is parallel to humans interests in not suffering. Animals are sentient beings, meaning that they experience both pain and pleasure as we do. Singer approaches this argument from a Utilitarian perspective, implying a principle of equality. Utilitarianism states that the moral worth of an action depends entirely on its contribution of maximizing the total happiness or pleasure among all people while minimizing the total pain or suffering.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Animal extortion is an ongoing issue in relationship to animal welfare and rights. There seems to be some ethical areas that individuals feel need to be changed on how humans use animals for human personal benefits. The argument supporting animal extortion and maltreatment has been the same for generations, including this view on animals used for experiments, “These benefits to humans far outweigh the costs in suffering that relatively few animals have had to endure. Society has an obligation to maximize the opportunities to produce such beneficial consequences, even at the cost of inflicting some pain on animals” (Andre & Velasquez, 1988). When looking at public policy and a resolution, it becomes a question of overcoming this…

    • 2353 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is to say that animals are only used at our disposal because they do not think in the same ways humans do. The founder of modern utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham, thought differently than Aquinas and Kant and believed in the direct rights of animals. He rebutted those who thought like Kant by stating “The question is not, Can they reason? nor Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?”…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill's Utilitarian Theory

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Utilitarianism Utilitarianism, a theory formed and made popular in the 18th and 19th century by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, is a form of consequential theories in which humans believe that our actions are based on our happiness. Happiness is what deters humans from acting in what they believe to be a good or bad manner. According to “Living Under God’s Law: Christian Ethics”, the one goal that is sought out is pleasure. If actions cause harm or do not promote happiness, then the action is considered wrong (Fox, 1912). This theory is a system is one in which actions can be measured on how good or bad it is by how much pleasure or pain is caused from it.…

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Human beings are only obliged to extend ethical treatment to animals only if they are endangered, domesticated, or abused. Sure one can raise the argument for Darwinism to take it’s role, but if humans have the ability to alter mother nature’s intentions, then why let it happen? Besides, every single plant, animal, or organism contributes to an ecosystem, and are either prey,predator, or producer and create an interdependence on one another for survival. If an endangered species ends up extinct, then the whole ecosystem will suffer.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Essay

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Abstract World hunger is a widespread issue concerning not only our moral obligation as humans, but also as a society. All human beings have dignity deserving of respect and are entitled to what is necessary to live in dignity, including a right to life and a right to the goods necessary to satisfy one's basic needs. Malnutrition is a condition of nutrient deficiency that steals the lives of thousands of people on a daily basis. This epidemic can easily be managed. The suffering and death that are occurring now are not inevitable, nor unavoidable.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thesis Statement Animals deserve rights, and these rights should annihilate the problems with animal abuse, abandonment, and animal experimentation. Purpose Statement The purpose of this research paper is to discuss animal rights and what animals right activist ideology fight for which includes animal abuse, abandonment, experimentation, and laws that prevent inhuman actions towards animals.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ethical treatment of animals should be taken more seriously because of the cruelty suffered by animals at amusement events, factories and in the research field. Animals ethics is a term to describe the way the human reacts with the animal and how the animal should properly be treated. Many philosophers believe that since animals doesn’t have the moral judgement that humans have, then anyone can do whatever they want to do them because they don’t know right from wrong. An animal is very important, the animal will know if what is happening to them is normal or not, many things people do to them wouldn’t be something they experience on a daily basis. Animals doesn't deserve to be treated any differently than humans.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Farm Ethics

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe they should be left alone to live their own lives. They don’t come out and bother us or destroy our homes, so what right do we have to destroy theirs? Most of these ethical theories are similar to my belief, mostly Mill’s Act Utilitarianism. Animal’s suffering is far more devastating then human’s little happiness from meat products. They should be allowed to be free on their own, just as how free we…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay’s objective is to present both sides of the issue, allowing the reader to further investigate and form their own ethical stance for or against animal rights. For many, it is…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays