Utilitarianism In John Stuart Mill's Ideas

Improved Essays
A. In my own words Utilitarianism is the thought of happiness to the highest level as the base level of morals. Utilitarianism also is thought to say that actions can be good but also in correlation as they give off pleasure and are fallacious in the same correlation as they might produce the opposite of pleasure. Mill’s idea is different from Bentham’s theory because Mill’s created the Utilitarianism subject but he used Bentham’s ideas or principles. Mill and Bentham might have headed in a different direction because of their hypothesis’s in relation to the nature of humans. Bentham focused in on the idea that humans were nothing more than an animal. Bentham has the idea that humans are always pursuing pleasure. Mill thinks that humans are

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For John Stewart Mill, the resolution of the case study considers the outcome of the moral decision and involves the weight of pain against pleasure, calculus, and a consideration to higher, elite pleasures. Mill’s utilitarianism is supported and influenced by Jeremy Bentham’s philosophy, both of which call for the weighing of the pleasures of an action against the pains of those actions. Furthermore, in making a moral decision, one should use calculus by simply taking a vote of the polis and adhering to the greatest good for the greatest amount of people, known as the “common good.” Here, humans may sacrifice their wants and self-interests for the common good since utilitarianism obeys to a non-egoistic approach. Additionally, Mill’s philosophy also states…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Case Against Utilitarianism In John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, he explains that the amount of pleasure and pain is what dictates the morality of actions. An action is justified if it brings more overall pleasure than pain to people. While it is generally agreed upon that pleasure is good and pain is bad, I believe that these qualities by itself cannot determine morality. Utilitarianism is not the right ethical theory to follow because utility is not inherently measurable and pleasure and pain are not the only determinants of morality.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill's Utilitarian Theory

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Utilitarianism Utilitarianism, a theory formed and made popular in the 18th and 19th century by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, is a form of consequential theories in which humans believe that our actions are based on our happiness. Happiness is what deters humans from acting in what they believe to be a good or bad manner. According to “Living Under God’s Law: Christian Ethics”, the one goal that is sought out is pleasure. If actions cause harm or do not promote happiness, then the action is considered wrong (Fox, 1912). This theory is a system is one in which actions can be measured on how good or bad it is by how much pleasure or pain is caused from it.…

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill was a student of Bentham and carried on the Bentham's utilitarian teachings. Mill…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1848, German philosopher Karl Marx published The Communist Manifesto, a political pamphlet which went on to be recognized as one of the world’s most influential political manuscripts. Indeed, The Communist Manifesto was an attempt at explaining the underlying goals of communism, an ideology that contrasts heavily with the utilitarian views of English philosopher John Stuart Mill, who in 1859, published On Liberty, an application of utilitarianism to society and state. Evidently, Marx’s and Mill’s views leaned towards different ends of the political spectrum, although their opposing viewpoints did hold underlying similarities. To that effect, the two thinkers’ contrasting worldviews will be studied through an analysis of their outlooks on…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even if the circumstances of the genesis of this work gesture to an occasional piece with a popular goal, on closer examination Utilitarianism turns out to be a carefully conceived work, rich in thought. One must not forget that since his first reading of Bentham in the winter of 1821-22, the time to which Mill dates his conversion to utilitarianism, forty years had passed. Taken this way, Utilitarianism was anything but a philosophical accessory, and instead the programmatic text of a thinker who for decades had understood himself as a utilitarian and who was profoundly familiar with popular objections to the principle of utility in moral theory. Almost ten years earlier (1852) Mill had defended utilitarianism against the…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism’s consequentialist theory’s foundation bases its judgment only on the consequences of the action. According to John Stuart Mill, the basic principle of utility or “the greatest happiness principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (MacKinnon & Fiala, 2015, p. 104). These actions are judged by the extent to which they produce happiness or avoid unhappiness for all. A morally right action would be one that produces or tends to produce happiness without pain and ultimately be the desired result of all actions. A morally wrong action would be one that brings pain or denies pleasure.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is that we should conduct ourselves and act in promoting the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people, even if that means that we ourselves are not directly happy from the task. There are two ways of to endorse utilitarianism, one is to act utilitarian meaning that peoples actions are right and they promote happiness for the general public, whereas the wrong actions would promote negative feelings for the general public. The second way is to rule Utilitarianism, meaning an action is right as long as it adheres to the rule that leads to the greater good. While Kant and Mill both have similar stances on how we should behave and how to create the happiness of the greater good no matter the outcome for your own personal pleasures, they also have differences. Such as they both have a twostep process for greater happiness, they both propose a base morality however Kant appeals to the reason of legislating a law for a reason, while mill appeals to what the people desire as an…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The traditional view of consequentialism advocates the idea that “the only kind of result that is good in itself is happiness” (Haines). Since actions in themselves are neither good nor bad, it is important to consider the consequences of our actions. Jeremy Bentham, British philosopher and mentor to John Stuart Mill, measured these consequences by their hedonistic qualities—that is, “people should do what produces pleasure, considering the intensity, duration, certainty, quickness, how many other pleasures are produced, freedom from pains, and the number of people affected” ( (Daniel). John Stuart Mill expanded Bentham’s idea in Utilitarianism, in which he defined the greatest happiness principle. This principle states that happiness is based on pleasure and the absence of pain.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "Bentham's campaign for social and political reforms in all areas, most notably the criminal law, had its theoretical basis in his utilitarianism, expounded in his Introduction to the Principles of Moral and legislation, a work that was written in 1780, but it was not published until 1789."(BLTC, n.p) Bentham and Mill's version of utilitarianism talks about how they both addressed the social problem. Bentham's utilitarianism theory says "that it is found on the assumption that is the consequences of human actions that count in evaluating their merit and that the kind of consequence that matters for human happiness is just the achievement of pleasure and avoidance of pain."(Moreland,2009…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The recent events below have led to a series of protests over the past year but recently in the media the public has been advocating for the rights of African Americans in America based off of the neglect of the justice system for these young black men. These situations were all against young black males that had absolutely no reason to be murdered as a means to a solution. As these three situations only stand as representations of the many black male to be victimized by the police system in America it also shows us that although we have made strides in race relations and equality we still have a very long and tiring journey to go to be fully accepted by our fellow counterpart. Laquan McDonald was shot 16 times by a Chicago…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Analysis

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Since 1837, the Great Britain had entered the Victorian Era, a time when Industrial development and overseas expansion reached its peak. As a result, interest and self-serving nature of utilitarianism became the mainstream of thought and culture. Bentham and Mill's utilitarianism degenerated to a trend of pursuing money and material, ignoring the moral concern of well-being and human’s overall development. “The greatest happiness of the greatest number” had been shelved; “public welfare” was completely set aside; people became narrow utilitarian who only saw the "self-interest" part of utilitarianism. On the aspect of consequentialism, utilitarian philosophy advocated to evaluate a certain active from the perspective of result, which was in line with the psychology of rising capitalism-as long as beneficial to profit increase, motivation and means can be neglected.…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays