Utilitarianism In Converging Media

Improved Essays
Assignment #4

In “Converging Media,” Pavlik and McIntosh stated that “utilitarianism assumes that the

most ethical action does the greatest good for the greatest number” (Pavlik & Mcintosh, 2017).

Pavlik and McIntosh also noted that one of the principle ideas of utilitarianism is that an action

that may hurt someone or something is “still right if it helps many more people” (Pavlik &

McIntosh,2017). Utilitarian decisions are usually made when sacrifices or bold actions are

necessary for the benefit of some people; even if dire consequences could result.

One real life example of utilitarianism in the news is an incident that happened earlier this

month in Oklahoma. According to Mythili Sampathkumar of independent.co.uk,
…show more content…
Although negative consequences could’ve resulted from making that

utilitarian decision, it was the ethical thing to do because three innocent lives were saved thanks

to Mr. Freeman’s unselfishness.

Cultivation theory, which is called “cultivation analysis” in “Converging Media,” is defined

by Pavlik and McIntosh as “a theory of media effects that claims television cultivates in

audiences a view of reality similar to the world portrayed in television programs” (Pavlik &

McIntosh,2017). In other words, watching violent and disturbing content could lead the viewer

to perceive that what they see matches reality, as seen and mentioned in the “mean world video”

from Lesson 4 (Gerbner,2017). However, those thoughts are actually caused by exposure to

those “countless acts of violence” (Pavlik & McIntosh,2017). Due to this “mean world

syndrome,” this is why some people may think that going to public events (like concerts) is

dangerous, or that all Muslims are terrorists, even though those statements aren’t true. They

aren’t true because not all Muslims are terrorists and not every public event gets attacked. People

make those inaccurate assumptions based on what they see on the news, rather than what’s
…show more content…
Police have also stated that “at least four people were wounded and taken to the hospital”

(NY,2017). The shooter, who died in the hospital afterward, had been protesting in Washington

lately because of his heavily distraught feelings over President Trump’s election (NY,2017).

How this story relates to cultivation theory, is that after hearing about this event, people may

feel afraid of public events like this one and wonder if they can ever feel safe anywhere.

In an article written by Lindsay Kalter on bostonherald.com entitled: “Kalter: Kids may ask how

safe they are,” Kalter wrote that local psychologists have stated that children may wonder how

safe they are if a Congressman can be hurt on a baseball field” (Kalter,2017). Kalter also quoted

Ellen Slawsby who noted: “Baseball fields are a place of coming together and pleasure. Now it’s

unsafe” (Kalter,2017). Slawsby also speculated if anyone could even have the freedom to

express their political opinions and feel safe anymore (Kalter,2017). Those quotes by Slawsby

not only shows examples of cultivation theory, but also the spiral of silence; “a theoretical

construct that explains why people may be unwilling to publicly express opinions they feel are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Jeffery Sachs "A Nation of Vidiots" he frequently uses logos and ethos in his story, by explaining that the Television has changed the world in many ways, and as Americans we have taken it to a new level. Trying to reach the average American, Sachs explains in is story that in comparison to other countries the American people spend several hours watching Television. He uses examples like percentages from the 1950's and 1960's and compare it to this day an age. Reaching his readers that Television has become an addiction to us. Sachs context is social and some political, although most Americans admit they watch more than they should.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More significantly, Mill believes that “Instead of focusing on what the consequences might be for the majority of people, utilitarian’s might also focus on the best course of action for the people involved in an immediate situation”. (Perez & Moore, 2013). Meaning that operating in this manner does not mean that other interests are ignored such as, Ms. Lavallee being a victim of battered woman syndrome in the mental state of the accused at the critical moment when she pulls the trigger cannot be understood except in terms of the cumulative effect of months or years of being brutality…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are many ways how silence could be efficient or harmful. However, I believe that silence is dangerous in many ways possible. My reasons are that people wouldn’t be able to express their thoughts on important situation and serious topics with silence, as well as the tension of silence from the people. Also, people could have limited knowledge because of silence, and silence can be destructive to a person’s or the other’s personality. My first reason is that people wouldn’t be able to express their thoughts on important situation and serious topics with silence, as well as the tension of silence from the people.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. A. K. Moravec – Rebuttal I have to say that was, well, interesting. This has to be a short rebuttal and so I will just pick up on one area of disagreement. There are major flaws in the argument that trans-humanism lacks an able morality; in fact I want to argue that we have a moral obligation to pursue trans-humanism. We have obligations as people, and John Harris points out 2 main obligations.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Intro) Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat ethics” are contradictory philosophical works that examine whether scarce resources should be shared with the poor. Singer’s argument is that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (Singer, 1972); therefore all people become morally obligated to help the poor. While Hardin argues that ethics of a Lifeboat should be followed because there is a finite amount of resources available at our disposal (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Both authors take extreme positions by providing opposing arguments on whether we should be involved in helping the famine or not. This essay will analyze the rational of both authors’ while trying…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that society influences one man’s ethics and so his actions affect the public sphere. The expectations of and the relationships we have with people impact how we decide to act towards others. Disregarding the morals and needs of those around us is selfish and may cause displeasure to either of us rather than promoting happiness to many. John Stuart Mill’s “Utilitarianism” and Bethany McLean’s article “Everything You Know About Martin Shkreli Is Wrong - Or Is It?”…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. How might utilitarianism be used to resolve dilemma 4 (pg. 132 of Jones)? Do you agree with this resolution? Why or why not?…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tellishment Argument

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the moral theory of utilitarianism? According to Vaughn, “[Utilitarianism is] the view that right actions are those that result in the greatest overall happiness for everyone involved” (Vaughn, 79). At face value such a moral theory sounds great, because it should promote general happiness. While this is true, a particular argument, the telishment argument, shows that utilitarianism is not a viable moral theory because it promotes decisions that run contrary to historical moral inclinations. To prove this is the case, this paper will first dive into what happiness means in the utilitarian sense, the telishment argument itself, what points of contention the tellishment argument brings up against utilitarianism, and finally, what utilitarianism has to say in its own defense.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian Ethical Theory

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In fact, Baker Bill, (24), asserts that in Utilitarian theory, “the good is measured in terms of consequences of the action.” However, Chonko Larry (5) splits utilitarian theory…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Outline Of Utilitarianism

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ESSAY PLAN Paragraph 1: Introduction • Utilitarianism as a political theory o ‘Morally right act/policy is that which procedures the greatest happiness’ (Kymlicka 2002, p. 10) • Best way to determine morally right act/policy: • Consequences produced from ones actions – ‘consequentialism’ • Encourages maximizing this overall good • Can be viewed as an exhaustive moral theory o Will focus on utilitarianism as a ‘political morality’ • Outline of essay Paragraph 2: Overview of utilitarianism…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s world, people must make decisions that can impact not only them as individuals, but those around them as well. A question that is asked all the time is if the greater good of society is more important than the life of a single person. For example, some hot topics today are gun control and vaccination. Should there be tighter restrictions for guns so more tragedies like Sandy Hook do not happen again? Should parents be made to vaccinate their children so others who cannot get vaccinated are not affected?…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    RATIONALIZING OUR BEHAVIOUR 1 The first reason is “Everybody does it” - This has been used to excuse ethical misconduct. It is assumed that the ethical nature of an act is somehow improved by the number of people who do it, and if “everybody does it,” then it is as well: cheat on tests, commit adultery, lie under oath, Of course, people who use this reason usually don’t believe that what they are doing is right because “everybody does it.” Since most people will admit that principles of right and wrong are not determined by numbers, those who try to use this reason are really admitting misconduct.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truth is the the greatest insult to any civilization, yet almost every society strives for it. Honesty is something that people claim they wish for, yet when it’s told people get upset and deny it. The society in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 novel, takes place in a futuristic dystopia that relies on technology and lies. People obsess over parlor walls, huge flat screen televisions, isolating themselves from the world around them. The fake realities and stories played on the screen create a dishonest society in which the citizens are manipulated into not reading, thinking, or being exposed to truth.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays