Unreliable Instruments Case Summary

Decent Essays
DEMAND FOR A VERIFIED BILL OF PARTICULARS
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the undersigned demands that the answering defendant serves upon plaintiff within thirty (30) days, a verified Bill of Particulars of the claims alleged in said defendant’s Answer, setting forth specifically and in detail the answers to the following inquiries:

1. As to the First Defense, particularize and identify the collateral sources rendered and the amount of collateral offset that is claimed.
2. As to the Second Defense, set forth the factual basis that Plaintiff’s causes of action are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
3. As to the Third Defense, set forth the factual basis that the requesting Defendant was not negligent in any way in Plaintiff’s
…show more content…
As to the Fourth Defense, set forth the factual basis that the requesting Defendant was not a substantial factor in Plaintiff’s injuries, damages and loss as alleged in the Verified Complaint.
5. As to the Fifth Defense, set forth the factual basis that Plaintiff failed to mitigate damages.
6. As to the Sixth Defense, particularize how and in what manner the plaintiff knew or were otherwise aware of the negligence of those responsible for the incidents alleged in the Verified Complaint constituted a separate, independent, superseding, intervening culpable act or acts which constitute the sole proximate cause of the accident or occurrence alleged.
7. As to the First Affirmative Defense:
a) particularize how and in what manner the plaintiff fails to state a cause of action, in whole or in part, in which relief can be granted against the defendant.
b) particularize and identify the specific defenses that are alleged as the basis for the First Affirmative Defense, and the factual basis for asserting them against the plaintiff in this case.
8. As to the Second Affirmative Defense, particularize and identify the specific culpable conduct and/or contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff, or by someone over whom the answering defendant had to control;
9. As to the Third Affirmative

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ronald Vaden V

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Issue Presented by the Case The first issue presented in this case refers to the allegation of the breach of contract for insurance coverage provided by Steven Lucas. The second issue presented in the case is whether or not Steven Lucas is responsible for providing false information to potential clients. The third issue presented in this case refers to the accountability of Nunn and Vaden examining the policy and what the insurance program entails. Plaintiff…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    May 05, 2009 Legal History: Howard D. Brunson the plaintiff filed a four count complaint in the Supreme Court of New Jersey against Affinity Federal Credit Union and Wilcox for being liable to him for malicious prosecution (Count 1); That Wilcox was liable to plaintiff to negligence (Count 2): That Affinity was liable to plaintiff in hiring of Wilcox (Count 3); and that the person who actually committed the crime was liable to the plaintiff in negligence. (Count 4). Affinity and Wilcox moved for entry of summary judgement in their favor and wanted the case dismissed because they plaintiff had failed to appear for a deposition or a response to a notice which was in lieu of subpoena. Even though the plaintiff objected the trial court granted both motions.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Misaac Case Study

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    32) HOLDING a) The trial judge engaged in speculative reasoning while rejecting evidence which led to a conviction and denied the Apl. a fair trial, which justifies a retrial. b) Not answered. c) Not answered.(para.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Issue: Whether the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, and can prove the plaintiff was trespassing by entering onto the defendant’s property without permission and subsequently injuring themselves by operating the defendant’s tractor. Rule: Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout, 84 U.S. 657 (1873) Analysis:…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Releasing Party: JEFFREY WILLIAMS, his heirs, beneficiaries, family members, representatives, agents, assigns, trustees, insurers, attorneys, and anyone else making a claim through her or on their behalf (hereinafter referred to as the “Releasing Party”). Released Parties: PAUL WATKINS, ANNETTE WATKINS, THE TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY, a member of the Hartford Group of insurance companies (“the Hartford”); and all and any officers, directors, members, related corporations and entities, predecessors, successors, employees, representatives, agents, attorneys, heirs, trustees, assigns, insurers, and reinsurers of each (hereinafter referred to as the “Released Party”). RECITALS A. On or about August 23, 2014, on Maryland Route 404 (Queen Anne’s…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Work Case Summary

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On Thursday, 10/22/2015, at about 6:00 a.m., Claimant Gomez allegedly reported to work pain-free. The claimant stated he was not under a doctor’s care or taking any prescribed medication when he reported for work as a Park Maintenance III employee. The claimant stated that he worked with Mr. Shane Thompson and Mr. Richard Gomez, two coworkers with whom he works on a daily basis with. They were assigned to work at the city yard at 809 North Angelino Street, Azusa, CA 91702.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perin V Hayne Case Study

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Perin v. Hayne This is a case that involved the plantiff named Irene Perin, and the defendant who was named Robert Hayne. Robert Hayne who is the defendant was accused by Irene Perin of malpractice. November, 1968, Irene Perin had an anterior approach cervical fusion procedure done. This is a surgery that removes a herniated or degenerative disc in the neck.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Plaintiff Vs. Defendants

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The Defendants admit to statements 1 through 4, clearly stated in the Plaintiff’s claim. 2. The Defendants do not agree with the claim made against them. They deny that $30,000 or any amount is owing to the Plaintiff for the following reasons explained below: The contract between the Plaintiff (Susan Jones) and Defendants (Carol and John Allen Brown) was made on terms that the Plaintiff would be a surrogate mother for them in exchange for $50,000.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments & Authorities The movant for summary judgment has the burden of showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In deciding whether there is a disputed fact issue precluding summary judgment, evidence favorable to the non-movant will be taken as true. Every reasonable inference must be indulged in favor of the non-movant and any doubts resolved in its favor. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co., 690 S.W.2d 546 (Tex. 1985). I. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE THE PICTURES POSTED ON SOCIAL MEDIA OF PLANITIFF’S GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF HIS HOME AND OF PLAINTIFF SMOKING A…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fields Vs Fields

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is the Supreme Court opinion on the case of United States v. Fields. Abel Fields, a resident of California, is being tried for violating the Stolen Valor Act which was signed into law in 2006. I will be reviewing this cases and cases like it to better determine a decision. In 2011, Abel Fields attended a city meeting about public safety.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study Of Silva Morel

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Opening Statement- HAVE THIS MEMORIZED!!! The plaintiff has one preliminary matter to address. Before the plaintiff begins the opening statement, May we introduce ourselves? Silva Morel, an immigrant from Xanadu craved to come to the United States with the American dream.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are four elements of the intentional tort of battery. (1) There must be a voluntary, affirmative…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After being assigned to draft a memorandum for your review regarding Myra’s accident. Enclosed below are the four elements regarding the negligence claims, and the potential defenses we may have against Myra’s Claim? There are four elements to the negligence cause of action: (1) duty; (2) breach; (3) causation; and (4) damages or injury. A defendant is owed a duty of care to all foreseeable persons who may foreseeably be injured by the defendant’s failure to act as a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would under the circumstances.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Krouse v. Graham 19 Cal.3d 59, 562 P.2d 1022, 137 Cal. Rptr. 863 Facts: The Krouse family was returning from a grocery shopping trip and their car was parked on the curb. When Elizabeth (the wife) and Vinka Mladinov (neighbor) were returning to shut the door of the car, Graham hits a curb and rear ends the parked car. This results in the hitting the neighbor (Mladinov) and Elizabeth (the mother).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. If you were Mike 's attorney, how would you argue the case? Give three arguments. 1. One way is from a financial perspective about the perceived earnings lost from potential professional contracts.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays