United States Vs American Express Company Case Study

Improved Essays
United States vs. American Express Company
Hannah Garcia
Professor Lignugaris

In 2010, the United States State Attorney and seven other states filed a lawsuit for antitrust violations against American Express. When new credit cards entered the market such as Visa, Master Card, and Discover Card, American Express lost profits by roughly 20%. Since this hurt American Express and their earnings, they responded by tightening the contractual restraints of Non-Discrimination Provisions (NDPs). NDPs were used to control the way merchants treated American Express cardholders. American Express also made sure that merchants could not say anything about what kind of card they wanted their consumers to use or which ones they liked better. This lawsuit challenges American
…show more content…
Department of Justice, Antitrust case filings. (2010). United States of America, state of Connecticut, state of Iowa, state of Maryland, state of Michigan, and the state of Missouri vs. American Express Company, American Express Travel. Retrieved from website: http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f262800/262864.htm
McConnell, C., Bruce, S., & Flynn, S. (2012). Economics. (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill: Retrieved from website: http://www.icbcclaiminfo.com/node/168
United States District Court, Easter District of New York, United States of America, et al., against American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Nicholas G. Garaufis, United States District Judge.Case 1:10-cv-04496-NGG-RER Document 619 Filed 02/19/15 Page 4 of 150 PageID #: 34551: Retrieved from website: http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f312000/312037.pdf
The Wall Street Journal. Sidel (2015). American Express Loses Antitrust Lawsuit on Merchant Rules. (Justice Department claimed rules result in higher fees for consumers, hurt competition). Retrieved from website:

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thelma Agnes Smith v. David Phillip Riley, Statement of facts. The plaintiff and defendant cohabited together for numerous years without entering into marriage or civil union. Although, there was a romantic relationship. Unfortunately, the relationship has soured resulting in the need to liquidate assets that were acquired within joint ownership. The plaintiff and defendant had both agreed previously to how the assets would be divided, this agreement was not followed therefore litigation commenced.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Appellant V Luis Ortiz

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    requirements of Miranda or whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his rights”. (wicourts.gov) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Luis Fernando ORTIZ, Appellee, This case was filed in the Supreme Court of Iowa and was decided in 2009. On July 15, 2006, a woman called the Sioux City Police Department to report that Luis Ortiz, who she hired to do remodeling work in her house, “had forced her seven-year-old daughter to touch his penis”. After a brief meeting with Ortiz Detective Bertrand asked ortiz is he was willing to go to the police station with him for an interview. Once both arrived to the police station Detective Bertrand and Salvador Sanchez, a Sioux City officer, acting as translator, handed Ortiz a Voluntary Waiver of Rights…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS: 1. What is the regulation or law that you would propose? Be very specific in the wording. (This will be your own idea and written in your own words). (20 points) Answer:…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: This article is written by Jessica Silver-Greenberg and Robert Gebeloff, who are both reporters for The New York Times. It is argued that credit card contracts that include arbitration clauses prevent customers from joining together in class-action lawsuits, disabling them from challenging the company’s practices. Because many Wall Street corporations in effect have banned class-action lawsuits, with the aid of Alan S. Kaplinsky, many customers have dropped cases against them, since the cost of arbitration would exceed the monetary award, even…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texarkansas Case Study

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The commerce clause, Article 1 Section 8, of the Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. One would say that because of the fact that these laws are intrastate then commerce may not regulate; but that idea is struck down by the modern approach of the commerce clause. The modern approach to the commerce clause is commerce power that allows Congress to regulate and protect the channels of interstate commerce, the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, and those activities that substantially affect interstate commerce. In the Darby and Wickard cases this new approach came about. Both cases dealt with intrastate activities taking affect on interstate commerce.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of Discover Bank v. Thus, businesses that include arbitration agreements with class action waivers can require consumers to bring claims only in individual arbitrations, rather than in court as part of a class action. In the case of AT&T Mobility LLC against Conception, the Court is whereas clause the subject of clauses of obligatory arbitration, when deciding if the federal law is over the state law when disputes arise. The plaintiffs in this case accuse of fraud to the telephone company, promising “gratuitous” cell phones and later…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a landmark ruling, the court in FCC v Fox Television Stations by a 5-4 vote concluded that the Federal Commission’s action was consistent with its statutory obligations under the Administrative Procedure Act and that it ‘provided reasonable explanation for its reversal of policy direction its decision was neither arbitrary nor capricious.’ This case reveals a major shift in the application of APA on agency actions and will have a profound effect on future agency actions. Even though the majority of judges (5-4) ruled in favour of the FCC, their decision was completely inconsistent with previous case laws and moreover, in the words of Justice Breyer, hints at court decisions being frequently compromised by politics. The author thinks that Justice Breyer’s dissenting opinion in the case is not only more persuasive but also questions the lack of sound reason in the judgment and points out the dangerous trend of court decisions having political undertones.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A recent United States Supreme Court decision may mean that Kansas state boards may be vulnerable to antitrust lawsuits unless Kansas takes action to protect these boards. In North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Supreme Court held that state boards controlled by active market participants could be liable under Federal antitrust law. Antitrust laws are designed to prevent parties from limiting competition or trade in the market. Prior to the decision, many scholars and legal experts believed that state boards were immune from antitrust lawsuits, and so the Court’s decision represents a dramatic shift in antitrust law. This decision has the potential to have a massive impact on state boards in Kansas and may require serious action by the Kansas government.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sexual harassment in the workplace is a serious issue. Many women have be subject to unwanted attention from a supervisor and must endure it to keep their jobs. Below, is a discussion about what happens when one woman exposes her supervisor, opening a court case that would last for years. Is the company responsible as a whole? Ralphs’ should be accountable for Misiolek’s actions.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, American Express seems to be going above the lawful demands in waiving all yearly account charges, overdue fees, over limit fees, returned payment fees and billing statement reproduction request fees for military personnel currently deployed. Service members must supply their credentials to American Express, which then verifies that the cardholder is in fact on active duty. Spencer has also heard from other service members that American Express may even refund fees that were paid during the time the card member was on active…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This suite incorporates an extensive variety of standard reports that let individuals examine exchanges each day, week, or month and contrast the outcomes with various parts of the nation, different parts of the world, or predefined gatherings of comparable banks. Discussion Points a. MasterCard administrators are propelled to expand (1) the quantity of people who have and utilize a MasterCard charge card, (2) the quantity of banks and different customers who issue these Cards to clients and additionally workers, and (3) the quantity of areas that acknowledge MasterCard installments. Examine how MasterCard could utilize its information stockroom to enable it to extend each of these client bases. b. MasterCard makes its examination tools accessible to the majority of its associated banks and different backers. It realizes that getting its customers to utilize these instruments can be basic to keeping them as steadfast clients.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sherman Antitrust Act

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On May 18th 1998, 20 U.S. states along with the Justice Department submitted a filed a lawsuit against Microsoft Corp. The lawsuit contains various parts and claims against Microsoft. Most of these claims were associated with violations of antitrust laws and more specifically the Sherman Antitrust Act. This act was passed in 1890 by Congress and has two sections.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pros Of Mandatory Vaccination

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    " Case Western Reserve Law Review 63.3 (2013): 869-915. Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Apr. 2014.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many companies have and will share consumer financial information with their affiliates. The information that is released can be very sensitive and personal about the consumers. Sine the year of 1991 there has been financial occurrences with banks that have created troubles for consumers. As a result of shared consumer financial information, congress passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) to protect consumer financial privacy that requires companies that are classified as financial institutions that offer consumers financial products or services to explain their information-sharing policies and practices to their customers. The GLBA applies to all businesses that provide financial products or services co-consumers such as check cashing businesses,…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays