The United States foreign military policy is a policy that allows the United States military to assist any foreign country by any means necessary. The United States military has assisted many people starting back before the First World War. The United States military assisted the Texas army to defeat the Mexican army to take Texas from the Mexicans. The United States has helped many people and their crumbling countries including: Britain, France, South Korea, Vietnam, Baghdad, Iraq and many more.
The problem with this policy is that when we help the other countries we end up making ourselves a target for helping a country that was being overrun by invaders. An example of one of the consequences the United States has faced from helping a country …show more content…
The Russian government is so bad that if they changed their army it would be for the best because of everything that has happened. Losing a war to country can define how your country is going to defend itself in a major was with someone else, that’ll probably know all your tricks and get you from behind. President Boris Yeltsin proposing for a better army, “restore the prestige” (Yeltsin) and “You are tired of hardships” are the main reasons for change in his country. Yeltsin is defending himself because of the allegations he’s said “ruining both the army and Russia itself,” the officers plead to organize in the pursuit of legal rights. The head slate Viktor Chernomyrdin seems to be getting his country together and angling his army for when he needs it. Russia has his organization and his communications ready for when he needs to attract and support from impoverished civilians. Kremlin is the most secured building in Russia. Mr. Rokhlin thinks that the Russian army should cut down on the number of soldiers that are in the army. Mr. Rokhlin wants to cut down the Russian army from 1.7 million military personal to 1.2 million. Mr. Rokhlin believes that the Russian army can’t afford to pay for all the military personal it has …show more content…
The billions it costs to keep 100,000 American troops in South Korea and Japan, for example, make Asia more stable and thus better markets for U.S. goods.” As US troops are in the Middle East the United States has a security around the rich oil fields located in the Middle East. Some countries continue to spend billions even though there is no clear threat to their country. Countries say they are building weapons for defensive purposes but countries like America still send troops to foreign countries. Even though weapons sold to other countries may be used for bad purposes countries still believe that they still need to keep selling weapons. Many think that the more amounts of weapons a country has the more security issues it will have. Many blame that because of the amount of weapons the US is sending to other ally countries we are becoming a bigger threat to terrorism attacks. Most can see why the US is sending weapons and troops to foreign countries. They are showing that they are still a world power and will be for a while. Due to this the US has made itself a major threat to all kinds of attacks including terrorist
The problem with this policy is that when we help the other countries we end up making ourselves a target for helping a country that was being overrun by invaders. An example of one of the consequences the United States has faced from helping a country …show more content…
The Russian government is so bad that if they changed their army it would be for the best because of everything that has happened. Losing a war to country can define how your country is going to defend itself in a major was with someone else, that’ll probably know all your tricks and get you from behind. President Boris Yeltsin proposing for a better army, “restore the prestige” (Yeltsin) and “You are tired of hardships” are the main reasons for change in his country. Yeltsin is defending himself because of the allegations he’s said “ruining both the army and Russia itself,” the officers plead to organize in the pursuit of legal rights. The head slate Viktor Chernomyrdin seems to be getting his country together and angling his army for when he needs it. Russia has his organization and his communications ready for when he needs to attract and support from impoverished civilians. Kremlin is the most secured building in Russia. Mr. Rokhlin thinks that the Russian army should cut down on the number of soldiers that are in the army. Mr. Rokhlin wants to cut down the Russian army from 1.7 million military personal to 1.2 million. Mr. Rokhlin believes that the Russian army can’t afford to pay for all the military personal it has …show more content…
The billions it costs to keep 100,000 American troops in South Korea and Japan, for example, make Asia more stable and thus better markets for U.S. goods.” As US troops are in the Middle East the United States has a security around the rich oil fields located in the Middle East. Some countries continue to spend billions even though there is no clear threat to their country. Countries say they are building weapons for defensive purposes but countries like America still send troops to foreign countries. Even though weapons sold to other countries may be used for bad purposes countries still believe that they still need to keep selling weapons. Many think that the more amounts of weapons a country has the more security issues it will have. Many blame that because of the amount of weapons the US is sending to other ally countries we are becoming a bigger threat to terrorism attacks. Most can see why the US is sending weapons and troops to foreign countries. They are showing that they are still a world power and will be for a while. Due to this the US has made itself a major threat to all kinds of attacks including terrorist