I would re-post your unit 8 DB response today so you can get full credit because you posted your post on 6-5.
I do agree with you concerning Perry. I agree that he has done nothing wrong because he never changed the way he is handling cases or preparing them even with his original supervising attorney being out of the office. I would say that Perry could later on possible commit a ethical violation if he does something wrong and thew current supervising attorney does not catch it because he is unfamiliar with bankruptcy laws. I feel his supervisor could be breaking Rule 1.1 because Rule 1.1. [1] says "In determining whether a lawyer employs the requisite knowledge and skill in a particular matter, relevant factors include the