Unique Differences Between 'Give And Take' By Adam Grant

Improved Essays
The book Give and Take written by Adam Grant takes the reader to perspective of the unique differences that distinguishes givers who are taken advantage of by takers and successful givers who are adaptable when reciprocating with these takers. Essentially, givers are best described as people who are generous when lending their assistance to others in need, without asking for any form of reward or benefit in return. On the contrary, takers are individuals who exploit others to further promote their self-interests to get ahead without contributing back to those who’ve assisted them. Although takers can easily manipulate most givers’ considerate and selfless nature for their own personal benefit, givers who acquire the skill to recognize the takers’ selfish motives are easily able to adjust to the takers’ manipulative behaviors by limiting the amount of assistance offered to them. Givers are able to overcome takers’ …show more content…
Givers are typically considerate of everyone’s feelings, so when giver’s require something for themselves, they feel obliged to not take initiative on their behalf because they feel guilty of supporting their own personal interests. However, when they realize that their true intent is for the greater good of others instead of themselves, they can easily advocate for that purpose without having personal complications. In the book Give and Take, Adam Grant describes Sameer Jain as a employee at a professional service firm who spent most of his time mentoring other employees who then rose their salaries as he did not make sufficient means to support his family and pay off his debts. Grants elaborates on the fact that Jain was too passive when negotiating a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Robert D. Lupton, the founder of FCS Urban Ministries (Focused Community Ministries), writes this book to show a different perspective on the charity work people, churches, and organizations do. In Chapter 1, he presents the characteristics of something that he calls “the scandal.” Lupton is conscious that American are generous and want to contribute to charitable causes. However, he sees that much of the money people donate is either wasted or becomes harmful to the people that is supposed to help. Two of the reasons for this harming effect are that charity sometimes makes people dependent on receiving money or things for free.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Conversely, the act of selfless giving for the right reasons – to help others – is more likely to create long-term positive change. Due to the fact that she acts selflessly, even most times to her own disadvantage,…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Steuart Vs. Smith

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Smith identifies the propensity to exchange as innate in human beings. He illustrates that because people are self-interested they will seek to appeal to other’s self-interests in the pursuit of their own interests to get what is most advantageous to them. In other words, people want to help themselves but to do so they need others thus people have an innate propensity to…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Essay In the article “Charity means you don’t pick and choose” by Patricia O’hara, the author shows a contrast between the giving and the poor. The article explains how a little boy and his mother were stopped by a “homeless person” and how he asked for his “doggie bag” if the little boy wasn’t going to eat his left over food. The mother reacts by grasping her sons’ hand, which gives an impression that she feels vulnerable around a homeless person. This is contrasted when another group of people walked past and made an remark “It’d be better if they got a job,” which shows that second group of people have no respect for the homeless and judge them straight away.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doing good for others has been an act of kindness that countless humans have done. Being a person that is genuinely kind to others permit a person to sense a better feeling about themselves because they know that they have done a good deed, which the good could come back to assist them in the future. Even so, according to the novel, Superfreakonomics by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, they address different situations about the people who do good for the world, which is known as altruism; however, most will only do good deeds for a prize or an incentive. Usually, a person will do good because they wish to be known as helpful or they know that if they were to do something delightful, they might be recognized. Unlike these people, there are…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many of the world’s major religions, political systems, and moral foundations, resource sharing is synonymous with the concepts of compassion and generosity. Many people would agree that we are morally obligated to abide by the Golden Rule and do for others as we would do for ourselves. Although many would agree that generosity and compassion through resource sharing is just, one question lingers- is it realistic? In his essay, “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor,” Garrett Hardin argues that not only is resource sharing unrealistic, but that it can also be detrimental, as it stretches available finite resources to the point of ruin.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Giver Comparison

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is clearly possible for two entirely different people from diverse worlds to have uncommon thoughts and interests, but how is it possible they have things in common? Hannah experiences the great suffering and torture of the Holocaust. Passover was a very dreadful time for Hannah, but it is nothing like what she experiences when she enters through the door. She registers she isn’t where she belongs and has gone back in time. During the blast from the past, the young Jewish girl is sent away to a concentration camp.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Tripp Analysis

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Interview Narrative Of Diana Tripp (Draft 1) “There are givers and takers in this world, and you need to decide who you're gonna be. I’m a giver, and you’re a giver. Sometimes be a taker; don’t let the world take advantage of you. So be a cautious giver, be a wise giver.” These had been my mother’s words to live by.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Giver Comparison Essay

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages

    9)adj. Utopian- A perfect world. “The Giver” is about a utopian society where everyone and everything looks the same and there’s nothing more outstanding than other things.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Proverbs 21:26 states, “All day long he craves for more, but the righteous give without sparing.” Andrew Carnegie, a businessman that overcame a life of poverty, devoted most of his life’s earnings to others. He did this without asking for anything in return. Though he impacted American industry significantly, Andrew Carnegie 's greatest contributions came through his philanthropy, which benefitted millions of people. Carnegie began learning about giving from his early life.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example, when Jonas was at the ceremony of twelves, the Chief Elder said, ¨This is the time, when we acknowledge your differences. You elevens have spent all your years till now learning to fit in, but today we honor your differences¨(65). This being the first time in their lives where their differences were celebrated taught Jonas that differences are something that should be accepted and honored not something that should be ignored. One of the final themes taught in The Giver is the importance of freedom of choices.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “The Phenomenology of Gift Giving”, Helmuth Berking (1999), the author, explores the causes and mechanisms of gift – giving as a social practice. He maintains that the gift – giving is an essential part of reciprocal communication between individuals. Berking also suggests that both the gift and reciprocation to it corresponds to the established structure and character of human relations in a community. Berking (1999) starts by pointing out that gift – giving as a practice transferred from a political and economic sphere into the area of personal relations.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of false generosity occurs when the oppressor themselves, act as the redeemer of the oppressed. However, this is a false sense of kindness. In fact, they are not fighting to end injustices but are creating fake hope to make the oppressed feel indebted to them. Consequently, false generosity can only be perpetuated by continued actions of dehumanization and oppression (Freire, 1970). Nonetheless, true generosity is a combination of fighting to eliminate this false sense of kindness.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In conclusion, Modern society and The Giver's society…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social moral reciprocation sure makes this easier which is why it is the way we evolved. We all provide and take what we can, but also we ensure others attain enough to build and maintain these vital reciprocal…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays