James T. Polk's War: An Analysis

Superior Essays
“Mr. Polk’s War,” a war promptly named after the president at the time, James T. Polk, is an alternate moniker for the Mexican-American War for many reasons. For one, looking on the outside, the causes of the war seem to be unjust in that the Manifest Destiny, a widely supported policy by Polk, prompted America’s push West and eventual annexation of Texas from Mexico. However, on the tactical level, many commanders were entrusted with the responsibility of leading units in the fight against the Mexican people, and one of those commanders was a young lieutenant by the name of Ulysses S. Grant. Commander of the 4th United States Infantry out of Missouri at the time, Second Lieutenant Grant got the call to serve as part of the expansion westward merely because his unit had already defended the territory in expectation that Texas would be annexed at some point in the near future. Less than a year later, 2LT Grant found himself in the Battle of Palo Alto, and the battle forever shaped his command style, leadership philosophy, and approach to land warfare and how he led his troops. …show more content…
Grant found himself in a war that would test his intellectual capacity as a leader in a war that even he himself viewed as not justified. While he had his qualms with the cause, he still answered the call to serve and participated in what would be his first of many battles as a leader and displayed intellect in adapting to the change in mission. Intellect, in accordance to ADRP 6-22 is defined as “mental and social faculties the leader applies in the act of leading” (U.S. DoA 2012, 15). Within the realm of intellect, ADRP 6-22 further defines it as possessing mental agility, sound judgement, innovation, interpersonal tact, and expertise within the profession of arms. The Battle of Palo Alta was the first battle of the Mexican-American War and sparked what would be a 3 year endeavor to claim much of what is present-day Texas for the United

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It is a long accepted fact that Commanders in the Civil War were born in the fire of the Mexican War. Commanders of both sides in the Civil War learned many combat lessons fighting side by side. Knowledge gained throughout this war gave some Commanders victory in battles from Manassas to Gettysburg. The second change affected by the Mexican War was the concept of mobile, direct support Artillery that may have been the single most development of the Mexican War. The quick and decisive use of Artillery reshaped the combined use of Artillery and Infantry for…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Eboni Jordan Ms. Horwat Honors US/VA History Unit 3 Transfer Task Monday, January 9, 2016 President Jefferson v. President Polk Thomas Jefferson was the third president of the United States. James K. Polk was the eleventh president of the United States. Jefferson served two terms in office while Polk served one term in office. Both of these presidents used foreign policies in order to deal with other nations. As former presidents of the United States, James K. Polk and Thomas Jefferson were successful in foreign policy ,but James K. Polk was more effective than Thomas Jefferson because of the acquisition of the Oregon Territory and the U.S. gaining Mexico and other states in the Mexican-American war while Jefferson helped by creating the Embargo…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The troops arrived at the Rio Grande and Polk knew that the Rio Grande was the border and knew it would start the war. These documents show that the actions Polk took was to anger Mexico and it was to start a war on purpose so that Polk could win and gain Mexico. He also was trying to make a confrontation with Mexico and Mexico of course thought that Polk’s troops were attacking…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assuming the presidency from President Tyler, Polk was occupied with the Annexation of Texas, Mexico’s talks of selling California to Great Britain, and the boundary disputes of the Oregon Territory. His administration was highly concerned over a war with Great…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He famously composed his “letter to the people of Texas and all Americans in the world” in which he declared “I am determined to sustain myself as long as possible & die like a soldier who never forgets what is due to his own honor & that of his country. VICTORY OR DEATH.” (Petite M.D., 1999). In the mean time, Antonio López de Santa Anna managed to receive several reinforcement and started preparing for a final assault.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abraham Lincoln says “he is deeply conscious of being in the wrong” (Document D). Polk sends General Stephen Kearny to capture Santa Fe, New Mexico and Kearny from there was able to lead his troop to California. Before Kearny arrived, there already a revolt against Mexico…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In January 1846 he sent troops under General Zachary Taylor into the disputed area between the Río Grande and the Nueces. In late April a Mexican force under General Mariano Arista crossed the Río Grande and attacked an American patrol, killing or wounding 16 soldiers. On May 11, Polk sent a message to Congress and demanded a declaration of war against Mexico, claiming that Mexico had “invaded our territory and shed American blood.” His stated objective was the acquisition of California and New Mexico.…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lecture 34: Whose Manifest Destiny? 1. Why should Am.s have regard.exp. to Pac. Coast as “manifest” destiny?…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, as Polk insisted, it is the country’s and its citizens’ duty to “…vindicate with decision [to go to war for] the honor, the rights, and the interests of [the] country.” (p. 75). However, it’s extremely important to note Polk’s desire to acquire California. Polk had previously attempted to buy California before these conflicts had even arisen. He wanted to prevent Britain from making any claims on the land and also held knowledge of gold and silver in the area that would eventually lead to the Gold Rush.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A quick war was fought and Mexico lost, as terms of their surrender Mexico essentially gave the United States the West Coast, which includes California, New Mexico, and Arizona. The war between the Mexico and United States could be connected to Manifest Destiny because people in Texas did not want to abide by the Mexican laws because they felt they did not have to follow because it was not in God’s will. For Manifest Destiny gave them the right to settle as far west as they want and not follow any other rules except for America, because America was permitted by God to settle west. Manifest Destiny and westward expansion was also a political factor because it allowed for President James Polk to come to power, and spur on westward expansion. Under James Polk, the victory of…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mexican American War was the first war that the United States primarily fought on foreign soil of which led to great amounts of bloodshed at the detriment of Mexico. The United States originally provoked the war as U.S. president James K. Polk set his eyes on expanding west as he believed in “Manifest Destiny”. The War was a result of the United States Annexation of Texas. Texas was its own Republic from 1836 through 1845 after winning it war for Independence. Mexico although never recognized its independence while the United States did recognize Texas as a sovereign country in 1837 but it did decline to annex the territory.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The review of the book Sam Houston and the American Southwest highlighted that it is a scholarly account written by an expert on the role and impact of Sam Houston’s leadership in Texas, and the wider region. The author’s role as the author of the account is not questionable, the presentation of information is highly articulate, and the evidence provided supported the thesis of the book sufficiently. From the reviews made about the book, it is apparent that it is a research-based account of Sam Houston and his impact. Tucker, S. 2013. Almanac of American military history.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polk sent John Slidell, a special envoy, with a American Army, and that had anger the mexican officials (Roden Background essay) Then on April 25th 1846, an American army lead by…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American soldier William Barret Travis instructs in his letter “Commandancy of the Alamo” that Texans – and all Americans – should fight for their independence from Mexicans to…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sleuthing The Alamo In the Rhetorical analysis, Sleuthing The Alamo, James E. Crisp dives head long into an extensive evaluation of the events, people, and historical stories of the Alamo. As he began his research he stumbled across a speech written and given by Sam Houston. Houston is a well acknowled man in both Texas and U. S. history with a reputation for fairness, and being and all around good wholesome man with a polished set or morals. Upon reading a statement Houston made to his men Crisp felt as if something were wrong.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays