Tyranny Of The Majority Analysis

Decent Essays
I agree with both Steven and Dan. The meaning of tyranny of the majority can be broken down. Tyranny means cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control. I feel that tyranny of the majority is an oppression by the majority to the minority. I think if you are part of the majority that your mind conforms to what everyone else in the majority thinks. A good example that was discussed in lecture would be the American Indians. American Indians were the majority in this country until europeans started to migrate over. When they become the minority their opinions for the sake of the country no longer mattered. The indians were sent off to reservations while the european man (the majority) had control of the land and country.

I also agree

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny will not be allowed in the United States. Since the Articles of Confederation were passed, it began to become chaotic. In 1787, fifty-five delegates representing 12 of the 13 states came together in Philadelphia to help revise the document and eventually made a new one; The Constitution. How will they make a new Constitution avoiding Tyranny? Tyranny is when an individual, few, or many seize control of other people.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carmelo Figueroa Per. 4 November 2, 2017 How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? Tyranny is one of the reasons that governments have gone to anarchy; People have rebelled and started riots or even wars due to the oppression of tyranny. The founding fathers of America wanted a government that was strong, but not too strong.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout its history, the United States has had countless instances where racial and ethnic tensions were overt and aggressive. For example, the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s puts these tensions on display for all the world to see the harsh reality that American democracy was not protecting its minority groups like it was intended. Instead, it was acting against them to benefit the majority. American democracy was created with the intent to protect the rights of the minority from the majority. Today, the United States has come a long way from its grim past of racial segregation.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, our government is made up of people with different political ideologies and assertions. Our association with certain political parties is an example of our differences. Republicans and Democrats throughout history have represented the interests of their supporters rightfully. Conservatives have contrasting views upon the economy, social issues, and international policy. Liberals uphold democracy to its highest standards and support an equal political community.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protects Against Tyranny Had The Constitution not guarded against tyranny, society as we know it today would be very different. James Madison tried to create a better law system because the Articles of Confederation did not support their government. The cause of their weakness lies in the fact that they did not have a court system nor a Chief Justice. While writing The Constitution, Madison’s biggest concern was that one branch or person was going to have power over the other branches. If that would have happened it would have led way to tyranny.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution guards against tyranny by utilizing all three branches to keep each other in check. Each branch of government is separate, which allows them to not abuse their power and take advantage of people. Small and large states need to have one representative, as well as two senators. The three branches of government have prevented tyranny for a long time.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people of the 1700s, were free to have slaves that worked for them if they so chose to do so. This statement is one that everyone can agree on. People of the 1700s, also had freedom of religion. I question how these two actions can occur during the the same time period. Most people would agree, in today’s time period, that slavery is wrong and goes against all morals.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Electoral College Faulty

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many times the votes of the minorities do not affect the…

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    To prove his reasoning, Thoreau gives an example of the unjust practice of majority voting. He says, “When the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted... to rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right,...but because they are physically the strongest. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice” (Thoreau, 2). Basically, Thoreau is explaining that in a majority vote, not everyone is treated fairly. Those who are a minority must then forcefully abide by the decisions made by the majority.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On December 29, 1940, the thirty-second President of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, delivered a speech via radio entitled "The Great Arsenal of Democracy. " The announcement was made a year before the Attack on Pearl Harbor, at a time when Germany had occupied much of Europe and threatened Britain. This speech 's purpose was to promise of the United States ' indirect support of the countries fighting for democracy and freedom in the Second World War, like Britain, against the Nazis and their allies (the Axis) through provision of weaponry and other supplies. However, in order to do so, he thanks current contributors and requests the help of more American people to put in their efforts to produce this massive amount of weaponry. In this time of crisis, the United States is not as safe as it thinks it is.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    government the majority chooses, its first act is to set up a legislative government in power which is supreme and it can’t be changed unless the whole government is dissolved. The legislative power while supreme within the common wealth cannot be arbitrary, it cannot deprive someone of life, liberty, or a state. If the legislative power did deprive people of life, liberty, or the state no individual would have voluntarily left the natural condition. What has been given to government is the law to enforce nature, so that is what we give up to government when we create a government from within political society. We give it the right to enforce the law of nature.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public goods are benefits that the government provides for everyone. Examples of public goods include National Security, Rule of Law, street lamps, and roads. Collective action refers to action taken by people with shared interests assembled into groups, called factions, to achieve a common objective, e.g. to encourage a new ideal for their community. It is often difficult to organize collective action to achieve public goods because people are self­interested.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While majority is a major tenet of democracy, it is flawed because the largest and strongest group is not necessarily the most just. Therefore, government policies and federal and state laws are a cesspool of injustice and iniquity. The government imposes itself on its citizens, leading to immoral citizens with an undue respect for a corrupt system. Instead, Thoreau argues, citizens should use their consciences and not blindly follow the government; they should make decisions based on moral codes and not legal…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Authority and Democracy are both very important factors within society, in regards to the state and the people within society, philosophers such as Plato and J.S Mill both discussed and formed opinions of both authority and democracy. However, both of their views appear to be very different in terms of distribution of education amongst society and the extent of political truth. Throughout this essay, both Plato and J.S Mill’s theories will be explained and analysed to show the differences and also similarities between the two of their views. Authority is the power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience amongst others. Society automatically accept the right of the state to actively use their power.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importance Of Democracy Essay

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Sadly, it is true that the minorities never really get a chance to win elections in this form of government. However, they do get other equal rights such as education, religious freedom, property and so on. Well, first of all the fact that the minorities have low chances to win an elected position does not mean that the minorities do not have the right to vote. They are free to vote whomsoever they fancy but the final result is the will of the whole nation rather than of a particular community/race.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Superior Essays