Typical Pattern Of Reasoning In Moral Matters

Improved Essays
1. What is a typical pattern of reasoning in moral matters?
Through dialogue in the Crito, Socrates outlined the process of addressing moral matters. First, decisions must be made through reasoning, and exempt of emotion (Cahn, 2013). Next, during the decision making process we must think for ourselves, therefore, we may not be able to appeal to popular beliefs or adhere to social norms. Finally, our decisions should not be morally wrong, regardless of outside influences or potential consequences. In summary, this process requires the identification of facts, application of ideas, and development of conclusions.
2. In answering moral questions, do we need factual knowledge?
Cahn (2013), emphasized that moral questions require factual knowledge,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Every situation is different and requires multiple factors to find a resolution. It can be based either facts or morality and can already create or be interpreted as an appropriate response as well. This is shown through Bitzer and Vatz. A situation requires a long process that leads to the persuasion of their audience. The audience is ones to decide within themselves to agree or disagree their argument.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Arguments Against Crito

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Crito Paper Dominic Corridore The citations are a bit off, since I am missing quite a bit of the text. I am using my dad’s Plato book, which is different. Body 1- Socrates Arguments: Since we have already provided background information about this case and all is clear, I would like to suggest to examine the arguments however note that we will not enhance or attempt to destroy Socrates’s arguments at this moment. The sub arguments are as listed: the opinion of the many and experts (Crito, 44c- 44e), the central moral principle (Crito, 48a- 48e, 49a-49d)…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Multiple moral reasons may apply to specific cases, but it is important to distinguish between each applicable moral reason in an argument. Moral reasoning requires that four criteria must be met including; universality, thoughtfulness, concern for others, and expression of moral value. Though a particular situation may have many moral reasons, one moral reason being explained at a time will reflect a clear understanding and justification for the reasoning. Providing a list of moral reasoning related to the case in 'steps' may help to streamline the argument and make points valid. When considering moral reason in an argument one must ask themselves, " Does this reason apply to everyone?"…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within these two pieces by Plato, an apparent contradiction is made through Socrates, in the Crito and in the Apology. Through both articles, the audience is able to determine that Socrates is a person with imagination derived from the contradictions presented, such as being wrongfully convicted, but reluctant to elude his unjust penance. In the Apology Socrates defends himself against a jury and why he should not have to obey the law and be allowed to continue practicing Philosophy. Crito is a conversation had between Socrates and Crito, in this story Plato leads the audience to believe that Socrates know thinks it is unjust to disobey the ruling.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue In Plato's Crito

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just or unjust, good or bad, virtuous or vicious- Pablo López Yagüe The writings of Plato, Sandel, and Straus bridge centuries but all highlight the importance of political theory as the basis in providing a discourse for the reflection of life. Plato’s Crito focuses on reason by adapting the moral point of view on the affairs of justice and virtue, through the analysis of the human natural and the social contract. Sandel’s Doing the Right Thing deliberation on problems helps assess the difficulty of morality over individuals, society and the law in determining what is just and virtuous. However, Straus’ What is Political Philosophy considers the Socratic political philosophy thesis in an effort to restore rationalism, by criticizing positivism…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates’ trial and eventual death sentence in Plato’s Apology consisted of unexpected claims as well as unorthodox methods that left many readers questioning Socrates’ motives. Rather than adhering to social norms and working to get out of his current situation, Socrates chose to use the trial as a stage to execute his duty to the city—a duty that led him to dissent from the immoralities within Athenian society through questioning and educating the crowd on moral behavior. Plato demonstrates Socrates’ duty to Athens is to hold society to the highest moral law, and in doing so he is led to both question and educate society on the immoral practices within it. In critiquing these wrongdoings, he dissents from the demands, expectations, and customs…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates Is No Prince Socrates and Machiavelli lived in a time of political and civil disarray and chaos. Their thoughts on political philosophy and theory are a product of the times in which they lived. Through interpretations of their own political climate, Socrates and Machiavelli produced two schools of political thought that are incredibly different and contrasting. Plato’s Apology and Crito and Machiavelii’s The Prince present these two vastly disparate ideologies.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? why or why not? In Plato’s Apology, there were several charges against Socrates during his trial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals hold distinct values and often conclude their interpretation of the world is true and right. It is this complex fusion of values and beliefs that lead to ethical dilemmas. Newman and Pollnitz (2005, page 108) describe ethics as what we perceive to be the right course of action, what we…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The interesting aspect of morality is how universally unbiased it is supposed to be, but yet, is still met with a debate towards what is morally correct and morally wrong. While morality is supposed to be objective, there is a subjectivity to whom those morals apply to and to whom they benefit or harm. In Chelsea Schein and Kurt Gray’s "The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm,” they discussed the evolution of morality and how difficult it is to establish a clear answer on what morality is. Schein and Gray wrote, “[one] definition of moral judgment is ‘evaluations (good vs. bad) of the actions or character of a person that are made with respect to a set of virtues held to be obligatory by a culture or subculture’ (Haidt, 2001, p. 817)” (Schein and Gray 35).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay 1 – Plato 1. Why does Socrates conclude that he ought to submit to the law? When considering the reasons behind whether Socrates should submit to the law, it is essential to contextualize the thoughts and beliefs of the individual, based on its morality. The perception of enraging deterioration to the state enhances its application of virtues when reflecting upon the situation.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Catholic moral reasoning does not solely rely on the sources and norms of the Catholic Church in order to obtain friendship with God. While the sources and norms serve as the primary ways to achieve and know friendship with God there are different aids that are available to help one pursue one’s proper ends. The aids are broken into external and internal. There are also obstacles that stand in the way or interrupt one’s pursuit of the good; these are called vices. With the help of the external and internal aids, along with the pursuit of virtue one can overcome vice and reach one’s proper end.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One must constantly go through the process of introspection in order to live an examined life to not be swayed by popular opinion but instead become knowledgeable of the world around them and the self. For Socrates, to care for the soul is the most crucial responsibility in life because of his belief that the soul of an individual is the true being of who a person really is. Throughout the book of Plato’s Five Dialogues, Socrates constantly questions society’s ethics and emphasizes how important it is for one to question and examine the world around them in order to care for the soul. Those who choose to live an unexamined life are losing the chance of attaining knowledge and becoming corrupted by choosing to live blindly based on popular opinion instead of their own beliefs. In order for people to live the good life,…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays