Two Aspects Of Criminal Law

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… What are those two elements? Explain fully with complete details (1) the performance of a prohibited act and (2) a specified state of mind, or intent, on the part of the actor. Additionally, to establish criminal liability, there must be a concurrence (agreement) between the act and the intent.
The Criminal Act—In criminal law, a prohibited act is referred to as the actus reus, or guilty act. In some cases an act of omission can be a crime, but only when a person has legal duty to perform the omitted act, such as filing a tax return.
State of Mind—A wrongful mental state, mens rea is also typically required to establish criminal liability. The mental state, or intent, is indicated in the applicable statute or law. Murder, for example, involves the guilty act of killing another human being, and the mental state is the desire, or intent, to take another’s life. When analyzing criminal law problems, students must always look for these two major elements: Guilty Mind and Guilty Act (mens rea) and (actus rea)

44: There are two areas of constitutional law students must know well in order to be successful on a constitutional law test. What are those two
…show more content…
- Character Evidence

49: What must you underline in order to understand the fact pattern in a real property question?
-The language from the conveyance, or what we transfer the property with: the deed or the will. If this information is included, it will be important.
-Any dates, as they will usually be significant.
-A reference to the rule against perpetuities might be a factor in the problem

50: What are the five key areas of property law that define the type of property? Please explain each.
1: Acquisition of property involves giving land as a gift; adverse possession; deeds; lost, mislaid, and abandoned property; bailment and license.
2: Estates in land involve fee simple, life estate, future interest, concurrent interest, and leasehold estates.
3: Conveyance of interest in land involves estoppel by deed, quitclaim deed, and
…show more content…
The one on which to concentrate is the rule of perpetuities.
5: Non-possessory interest in land involves easements, profit, and covenants.

51: Please list the five broad categories of tort law and tort liability
I. Intentional torts
II. Negligence
III. Strict liability: claims arising from abnormally dangerous activities; the rule of Rylands v. Fletcher and other common law strict liability claims; defenses
IV. Productsliability:claimsagainstmanufacturersand others based on defects in manufacture, design, and warning; and defenses
V. Other torts

52: What is the starting point in the analysis of torts questions?
: “What is the theory of this case? Is this case an intentional tort theory? Is it negligence? Is it strict liability?”

53: Students should note and think through the __________________ before evaluating the possible answers to a question
-Theory

54: In a negligence, case there will always be a question of _______________.
-Duty

55: Please answer completely and in accordance with your handbook. What are the key differences between civil law and criminal law

CIVIL LAW
Party who brings suit: Person who suffered

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plaintiff Log Case Study

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages

    I. Introduction This is a civil action due to an incident involving a park ranger and UH graduate engineer and his friends at Hawaii State park. The main party being held liable in this civil suit is the UH graduate engineer. Defendant Michael Nishimoto (“Defendant” or “Michael”) argues that this is nothing more than an unfortunate campfire event that accidentally injured Lehua Ching (“Plaintiff” or “Mrs. Ching”), park ranger in her line of duty and he should not be held liable. Also, Defendant argues that Mrs. Ching is a professional rescuer and is barred by the Firefighter rule to seek recovery.…

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Against Cardoza

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay # 1 – Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. In this essay, I argue against Cardoza’s ruling in the case of Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. I disagree that the original judgment finding the Railroad Company negligent should have be overturned. I begin with a summary of the case.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harco Case Study

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Harco is reporting this loss is currently on trial in Los Angeles, CA. This loss involves a wrongful death action of a 16 year old male passenger on the insured’s bus (open air double decker) in Los Angeles CA. The claimant was attending his friends sweet sixteen party, where the friends’ parents (Schlossberg), charted the tour bus from the insured. During the tour, it is alleged, the mother (Mrs. Schlossberg) of the girl hosting the party provided alcohol to the minors and left them unsupervised. At some point during the tour the bus entered the freeway and was traveling at approximately 55 mph.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is also referred to as imputed Negligence. __________ 9.Res judicata _ A matter already judged)- A legal doctrine that bars litigation between the same parties on matters already determined in a former lawsuit. ________________________ 10.Stare decisis (To stand by a decision) the doctrine that a trial court is bound by appellate court decisions (precedents) on a legal question which is raised in the lower court. ____ 11.Res ipsa loquitur _(The thing speaks for itself) a doctrine of law that one is presumed to be negligent if he/she/it had exclusive control of whatever caused the injury even though there is no specific evidence of an act of negligence, and without negligence the accident would not have happened.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Closing Argument Peoples of the court, opposing counsel, your honor we are in court today because of the criminal negligence of the defendant, Gene Forrester which led to the involuntary manslaughter of the victim Phineas or Finny known by friends. Today the Prosecution has shown without a reasonable doubt that Gene Forrester is guilty of involuntary manslaughter. Involuntary manslaughter refers to the unintentional killing that results from recklessness or criminal negligence. Criminal negligence occurs when the defendant should have been aware of the risk at hand and in Gene’s case the risk was evident. Gene stated that “ It was impossible to walk out on it far enough to be well over the river.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Campbell (2010) NSWSC 995 Desmond Campbell was found guilty of pushing his wife, Janet Campbell, of six months off a cliff top in the Royal National Park. Desmond pushed Janet from the top of a sheer 50m cliff south of Burning Palms, resulting in her death as she had hit her head on a rick platform below, in March 2005. Elements Of The Offence Before a criminal act can be brought to trial, the police and prosecutors need to prove the elements of a particular offence are present. The elements are; actus reus, mens rea and causation.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the six general categories of criminal law violations? Describe each, and rank the categories in terms of seriousness. Then list and describe the eight general features of crime. What are the “three conjoined principles” that comprise the legal essence of the concept of crime?…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Decline Of General Aviation

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Decline of General Aviation Airports The Rise of General Aviation In the early days of aviation, aviators were limited to flying during daylight hours, in near ideal weather conditions. Early pilots were not regulated as they are today, and would take off and land their aircraft in any flat open area, often a farmer’s grassy field, which allowed them to choose their direction relative to the prevailing winds. As aviation grew, pilots began to congregate in common areas, which allowed for ease of fueling, maintenance, and the telling of the occasional lies, giving birth to the airport.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hence the plaintiff shall claim damages under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 3b , which is in respect of an intentional act that is done with intention to cause injury or death. In order to successfully sue the defendants for the loss of earnings, Benji must establish the following three basics elements of negligence as defined by Gibson and Fraser (9th Edition) : 1. Does the defendant owe a duty of care to the plaintiff? Duty of care could be established from the neighbor’s test from Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, where it states that your neighbor is any person who is so closely and directly affected by what you do (the idea of proximity). Furthermore, it can be concluded from Fraser v Johnston (1990)…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Edtpa Self Reflection

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    U-ACT E,enetary Content reflections 1. a. For my edTPA I will being using lesson from the unit covering T Absolute True Diary of a Part-time Indian by Sherman Alexey, along with materials to prepare my students for the upcoming State Exam I feel this unit will allow the best opportunities to pull fair representations of my development as a teacher as well as opportunities to adapt/revise lessons to allow for student voices. Since this curricular unit will near its end and the material for the State Exam will be a review for the students, this should produce so exemplary models of student voice in the classroom. b.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sermonfils E Dor 1.Describe and distinguish among the three approaches to studying criminal justice systems by taking an international perspective. Comparative criminal justice is a subfield of the study of criminal justice that relates different justice system from around the world. There are three different ways of studying criminal justice systems. Each of these approaches encounter various beliefs of different societies. The criminal justice systems have changed and transformed over time.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to. There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays