Totalitarianism Essay

Improved Essays
4. Evaluation
Totalitarian states as well as Liberal Democratic states both have many advantages and disadvantages.
Advantages in a totalitarian state would be that totalitarian governments can exist on any end of political spectrum. From totalitarian communist regimes to the fascist government. An advantage is that it is easy to govern under the conditions of a totalitarian state because voting and other exercises of citizen’s freedom are not an impediment of governance. Another advantage could be that the role of the government is unlimited. Dictator in charge benefits widely from this type of regime because control and power is not shared or distributed amongst other representatives.
Disadvantages however contributes to the downfall of a totalitarian state. Dictator becomes very greedy and selfish with power. There is restriction or non-existent freedom and basic rights that is granted to citizens. Totalitarianism leads to suffering and oppression of citizens. Citizens of these states become rebellious and result to hooliganism in order to go against the government in charge. Citizens do not have a sense of identity because the ruler of the state limits citizens to
…show more content…
Citizens can be independent, they can own their own property and businesses. Every individual has equal rights and there are no racial, class and gender inequalities. Citizens are granted rights from birth and are equal under the law. Citizens have fair opportunities. (Anon., 2015-2017)
The disadvantages of a liberal democratic state are that the role of the government is limited. Not all the elections held in countries that are known as liberal democratic states are ‘free and fair’. This type of political rule could lead to corruption and embezzlement, representatives begin to steal from the country’s economy. (Publishing, 2017) power is not concentrated and there is a slow process of the system (Anon.,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    If the dictator wants it it happens for the good or the bad. Now I feel this leads to a grate amount of stability in that if the dictator wants it it goes this way the people don't have to worry about the more shadier side of the politics. A dictatorship leads to low crime rate this is because historically the laws passed be the dictator are quite harsh such as work camps for life or just death I think this leads to a lower crime rate because the people are to scared of the harsh punishment to do anything that is agenst the dictator or the laws the pass. The last pro of a dictatorship is efficiency in dictatorship a lot gets done for the good or bad because one person controls the whole government there is nothing that stops them from passing whatever they want this leads to efficiency because no one can stop or argue with them to pass laws. One of the cons for a dictatorship is one person has all the power if the one person in power has malaise intent or does not know how to run a country they can make bad decisions or pass laws that can limit the freedom of the people they rule.…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 5 Of Dahl Summary

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In chapter 5 of Dahl, he discusses the different associations through which governments practice is rules. He discusses the different government systems, and the main reasons why a democratic government is the best way of governing compared to alternatives. Democracy refers to governments that meet a specific criteria. In the previous chapters, he discusses how a government can never be totally democratic because it is impossible to meet every single criteria, but a system of governing can in fact be more democratic than others. Dahl discusses ten advantages of governing a state democratically.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Totalitarianism is one of the oldest and harshest forms of government there is, seeing as the citizens have little to no control over their own lives. The main goal of totalitarianism is simple, power. The leaders or dictators use there power to control the lives of their citizens, making them like slaves. Totalitarianism is one of the most fascinating forms of government, over years it has been eliminated except in certain countries like North Korea. Totalitarianism is not a spiritually effective form of government, people are born to serve their country and fellow men, not meant to care about themselves at all.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Totalitarianism Dbq Essay

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the 1900s, Totalitarianism had taken control and affected many governments. Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, Communist China, pre-WWII militaristic Japan and many other states, had all changed due to totalitarian regimes. Freedom in Societies no longer existed. And soon, societies had experienced rapid change and life under Totalitarianism had took a turn. In America, a great wave of enthusiasm began to take place, which soon swept through all Chinese society.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Totalitarianism Dbq

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Totalitarianism is a government that takes total control over every aspect of public and private life. This was the type of government Adolf Hitler transformed Germany into. Before Adolf Hitler came into power he joined a little political party known as the Nazi in the early 20s. The Nazi party was made up of middle and lower middle class and believed that Germany had to overthrown the Treaty of Versailles and combat communism. By 1932 Nazi became largest political party.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is everything to a totalitarian style to a socialist style. Some governments are extremely strong and controlling while some are very lenient. There are also several governments that fall in between the two extremes. Many great writers have given their diverse views on government and how they believe countries should be ran. For example; Lao-tzu believes in a very socialist government, Machiavelli believes in a totalitarian government, Rousseau believes in a democratic government and Jefferson believes in a democrat-republican government.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas government where one party controls both houses of the Texas State Legislature and the governorship are responsible for causing divisions in society by being "too partisan" or representing too many diverse interest, because they do not stand for anything. Being a one party, Texas cause people to live with consequences by segregating a way of life, because of how like-minded people are. This causes political problems, because there is no understanding for people who cannot conceive this lifestyle. Political parties function as a mode for which politicians can identify with a group that represents certain ideologies or certain citizen demographics. One-party dominance can greatly determine outcomes of elections and forcefully shape the…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Popular Sovereignty What exactly is a popular sovereignty? Popular sovereignty is a belief that the authority of the government is created by the will of its people. Actually, John Locke was one of the first to reveal the idea of popular sovereignty after Benjamin Franklin structuralized it. Franklin wanted to use it as a frame for an act of separation during the British monarchy. The popular sovereignty also links to the Declaration of Independence because they both have the same idea that, all men are equal and have the right to: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When addressing issues in tyrannical situations, life get’s much harder. And there is another option for dealing with oppressive governments: leaving or escaping the society. This solution has many difficulties as well, and it still points to anarchy as more desirable. First problem is that people generally don’t want to leave their homeland. They love where they live, and they won’t give it up unless they have to, so they usually try a revolution first.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Representative Democracy

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A democracy needs a balance of power; to protect the people and grant people power over government. A democracy needs a state to uphold its ideals and values, while still maintaining some form of liberalism into the mix. The state must keep affluence, the growth of inflation (modernly), increasing equality, a good position in international climate, and parliamentary institutions in order to steady its regime and continue its support. All together, achieving a democracy proves to be challenging to achieve, let alone uphold. Especially since a lot of values and beliefs can be upheld over other critical values in a democracy, and troubles and challenges that threaten the…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dbq Italy Totalitarianism

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Totalitarianismrefers to an authoritarian political system or state that regulates and controls nearly every aspect of the public and private sectors. Totalitarianismregimes establish completepolitical, social, and cultural control over their subjects, and are usually headed by acharismatic leader. In general, Totalitarianism involves a one party rule, typically led by a dictator; an attempt to mobilize the entire populationin support of the official state ideology; and an intoleranceof activities which are not directed towards the goals of the state, usually intendedto repressionand economic controlof business, labor unions, churches and political parties. Under a totalitarian form of government each individual is responsible to another in…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, it is a decentralized structure of government, meaning that many hands or groups of hands have a grasp at the power around them. When it comes to decision making, majoritarian allows all of its people to help in the decision making where as in pluralistic citizens can go up in front of certain leaders of the groups and be heard by them where the leaders would consider or not consider the citizen’s arguments. One of the few similarities that these two democracy have is…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Economic Freedom Economic freedom allows the society to think, feel, and act as they want, without interruption from the government. Humans love freedom, without compromises to anyone. Economic freedom is the government’s choice to rule with it, if it has the advantages on the country, but if it does not they should not. Economic freedom is measured as five areas, from the size of the government to regulation of credit. The results of the Studies in the nineteen-ninety-six about the impact of the economic freedom, have shown the increase of the rate of the investments, and the different kind incomes.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Totalitarianism and the authoritarianism share similarities such as: who has the control and the domain of the political power under a country, the connection that these dictators have with their population, and how they. How they exercise absolute control. These regimes have always been wrong to any society, because the population are mostly affected, they lose their democracy, dignity, the freedom, and even their…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Majoritarianism Analysis

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In what ways is having a majoritarian government beneficial, as well as detrimental, to the United Kingdom of the present? To begin, the majoritarian system may be seen as quicker and more…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays