Torrt And Wrongful Omission

Great Essays
INTRODUCTION
• Origin of the word Tort and its meaning:
The word tort is derived from Latin word ‘tortum’, which means ‘to twist’. It basically refers to a conduct which is not upright or lawful.
In English, the term tort is refers to a ‘wrong’.
Thus, the branch of law which deals with ‘torts’, consists of wrongful act wherein the wrongdoer violates some of the legal rights vested in another person. We ought to remember that the law imposes a duty to respect the legal right vested in the members of the society. If this legal right is breached, it is said to be a wrongful act.
• Some definitions of tort:
Some of the important definitions, which indicate the nature of law of tort, are as under:
…show more content…
publishing a defamatory article about a person in a newspaper or magazine) or, he must have omitted some act which he ought to have done. (e.g. the municipal corporation omits to close the pothole on the road)
It should be remembered that the wrongful act or wrongful omission must be recognised by law. If the wrongful act or wrongful omission is merely a social or moral wrong then the person cannot be held liable for his actions. (e.g. if someone fails to help a starving child , it is only a moral wrong and, therefore the person cannot be held liable for his actions.

II. Legal damage:
Legal damage means violation of a legal right. To succeed in an action of tort, the plaintiff has to prove that he has been caused legal damage. To simplify, it is to be proved that there was a wrongful act or omission of an act which violated the legal right vested in the plaintiff. No action under law of tort can be taken unless there is a violation of legal right. If there has been a violation of legal right, the same is actionable in the court of law, irrespective of the fact that the plaintiff has suffered any loss or not. This has been expressed by the maxim “Injuria sine damno” and “Damnum sine injuria”.
Let us study these maxims a little

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Tort/Crimes Assignment Bethany Gardner 1. Martellio Bennetto a. Claims Against: i. Vs. Adam Pacman Bones 1. Rule: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress a. Rule Definition: An intentional infliction tort of emotional distress is when the defendant performs an intentional act that results in emotional distress and b. Analysis: The defendant intentionally broke the electronic lift, out of anger, which caused the plaintiff to experience emotional distress.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court stated that the word harm interpretation has several definition meanings should read in the context of only applying it to the individual who is doing something morally wrong or as an injustice to others or…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Falwell did compensated $100,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. At first the fourth circuit affirmed, then the court reversed the decision. When developing an intentional infliction of emotional distress the plaintiff must prove actual malice as a…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In addition, other types of pecuniary harm can be alleged such as: The plaintiff engaged in criminal behavior; • The plaintiff suffers from some type of venereal or otherwise loathsome and communicable disease; • The plaintiff is unfit to conduct his or her business, trade, or profession; • or the plaintiff had engaged in sexual misconduct.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daily Speed Case Summary

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Daily Speed has carried out the act of Publication in traditional form as we have communicated the defamation to someone other than Leela; the defamation was highly publicized and we are primary publisher of the defamatory story and also secondary publisher since we made the story available to a third party (the public). In this case the liability extends across the journalist, editor, publisher and printer of Daily Speed who have participated in, secured and authorized the defamation and can all possibly be sued by Leela. Leela has several causes of action available to her: she has proof that Daily Speed made a defamatory statement about her, she has proof that Daily Speed acted…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort claim cost so much money to the healthcare organizations. Healthcare organizations like hospitals are making less profit because of the money they have to spend to pay for those claims. In addition, they have to provide malpractice insurance to their physicians. Moreover, tort claim would harm a healthcare organization reputation. Consequently, claims will decrease the demand for medical care causing patients to go to a different hospital or practice to seek for better…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brandeis Louis and Samuel Warren in their article talked about the right to privacy, the entitlement to have full protection in person and in property is a fundamental principle for everyone. They acknowledged that the principle is unfixed, and it has been reconstructed time by time because of political, social, and economic changes. (Warren and Brandeis 193). In short, the authors illustrated the development of common law about the life and property which always meet the new standards of our society, and they also made coherent and potent arguments to explain why defamation, property and contract law failed to provide appropriate protection for privacy. 2) The Authors’ Arguments…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Buffalo Creek Disaster is a book by Gerald M Stern, about how the survivors of one of the worst disasters in coal-mining history brought suit against the coal-mining company. The book … by Gerald M. Stern is about a disaster that happened in 1976 … The book was review by prominent persons search as the former President of the United States who termed it as “A shocking, timely book”. Also, The New York Times Book Review talked of the book as “a fascinating tale of how investigative lawyers work, intermingled with sympathetic portraits of the survivors of the disaster”. This shows the prominence of the author who was Harvard School of Law graduate.…

    • 2151 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Minority Report Questions

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Russo, David M. Professor Okeh 2/16/15 Minority Report Questions 1. What makes and action moral or immoral? It depends on the initial actions though. If you are going to commit a crime that either hurts someone else or in that circumstance then it is immoral.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Negligence tort occurs when one fails to demonstrate the kind of care a prudent and reasonable person would take under the identical circumstances and injury was birthed from the act or the absence of it. In order to justify that the defendant was negligent and therefore liable for one’s injuries, all 5 elements of tort ought to be satisfied. The 5 elements are: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact, Proximate Cause and damages Jane v Luke Since Jane has suffered injuries, she in immediately classified under a primary victim. The first element is duty, whether it was owed to the plaintiff. The law acknowledges the relationship between the defendant and plaintiff, and the existing relation in turn may justify that the defendant is obliged to…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It states that there must me a direct injury to the rights or protected interests of a party, along with personal or proprietary damage. In the case Frothingham v Mellon, a taxpayer disagreed with treasuries spending in a congressional act, so she said that it violated the 10th amendment the reserved rights for the states. The Court decided on this case saying that there was no direct or immediate injury because it affected millions of people. They also stated the case was political, not judicial. The Supreme Court was saying that the case had not standing because it affected many and not directly just her, which by the definition the case did not have standing.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Reform

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Group of ideas are designed to change an underlying liability rules in the civil justice system, tort reform. Tort reform often alters the cultural aspect of civil litigations and makes it difficult for the plaintiffs’ to do the following: a) whom to file the case against, b) filing a lawsuit, c) obtaining an enormous amount of money for their suffrage, and etc (Daniels & Martin, 2000). Even though, tort reform makes it difficult for the injured person to sue a company, expecting millions of dollars for every claim is ridiculous. Ramseyer and Rasmusen (2010) mentioned about McDonald’s Coffee incident when Ms. Liebeck received $2.86 million for a coffee spill. If McDonald’s keeps satisfying every injured person with the money they demand, their business will be penniless.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When being guilty by mistake the person that is innocent can be paying someone else’s sentence. When the person that is blamed for something they didn’t do they end up having to have that problem on their record. The person has the situation on the record it makes it hard to look or find a job. The crimes that innocent people are considered guilty are serious and can do a big damage to someone’s life. There are many people that have been accused by the police, by court, or even by someone that they had close to.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To protect restorative justice, active responsibility is an important element but, it is also argued that there could be injustice if passive responsibility has ignored. However, concerning of Brent Fisse’s theory of reactive fault, many criminal justice systems execute the concept of casual fault and reactive fault. The balance between this two fault very from one jurisdiction to another but, for example, in some Asian jurisdiction, reactive fault is the greater fault than causal fault. According to Fisse, for criminal liability ‘reactive fault’ is one of the most important element. In case of casual fault, if the fault is admitted then the liability, in criminal case, may be removed but may be not removed in civil cases.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays