To Kill A Mocking Bird Analysis Essay

To Kill a Mockingbird Analysis In the novel, “To Kill a Mockingbird,” the author, Harper Lee uses the conflict to articulate the idea that one can defy social prejudices by possessing moral courage and personal integrity. There are different disputes that are presented in the novel, notably, man v. man, man v. self, and man v. society. Moreover, the author wielded this literary element to further enhance the message that there are different ways a man can combat degrees of social prejudices by owning two essential behaviors. Correspondingly, in the novel, a vital man v. society interaction was Atticus Finch’s decision to defend Tom Robinson’s case amidst the discrimination and prejudice based on race in Maycomb County.
“For a number of reasons...the main one is, if I didn’t, I couldn’t hold my head up in town, I couldn’t …show more content…
society conflict presented us that integrity is another key in battling social prejudices. “...but she didn’t say any more. Neither did Atticus...she just fell down in the dirt. Just fell down in the dirt...stayed inside a long time, and Atticus came out alone. When they drove back by the dump, some of the Ewells hollered at them” (321) It is unusual for the people of Maycomb, especially those who are traditional, to see a White man consoling a Black family. But, as we see Atticus being vulnerable for the sake of Tom Robinson’s family despite of the Ewells hollering at them because they have a different view of what is right, he triumphantly, although subtly, alter the prejudice that a racial group is for their own. In this, the conflict of the novel became a bigger picture that uttered that it doesn’t matter what other people say, if it’s the truth and you know it’s right, you have to set aside the differences and be united because that’s what treating fairly is, and that’s what Atticus did when he consoled Helen and her kids about the loss of Tom