Three Stage Test On Tort And Negligence

Improved Essays
In order for someone to be found negligent the defendant must have owed the claimant a duty of care, failed to perform their duties and failed to fulfil their responsibilities, and damages must be incurred from this breach.

Donoghue and Stevenson established the first duty of care by setting up the neighbour principle, the neighbour principle highlights that anyone who is solely affected by your omissions or acts is owed a doc (Duty of Care) by you. In this case Mrs Donoghue drank part of a ginger beer from the bottle. After doing so a decomposed snail emerged from the bottle and she successfully sued the manufacturer.

After this case there was a series of inaccurate conclusions arising in courts and because of this the three stage test was established to further the criteria and accuracy of law regarding tort and negligence. In the three stage test for a duty of care to be imposed on someone their must be;

A) Reasonable foresight means that the defendants acts or omissions will injure/cause harm to the claimant and was defined in the case of Kent v griffiths, in this case the claimant was suffering an asthma attack, a off duty doctor phoned for an ambulance, the ambulance without just reason did not respond quickly enough and the claimant suffered a heart attack.

B) proximity between the claimant and defendant in either
…show more content…
in this case the defendants factory flooded after a severe rainstorm. The defendant placed warning signs, spread sawdust on walkways and informed staff of the slippery surfaces. However the claimant slipped and sued the defendant for injuries incurred. It was found that the defendant was not in breach of their duty as the only way to completely eliminate the risk entirely was to close the factory, this was not something that a reasonable man would do. The actions already taken were enough to prevent the risk of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    III BRIEF STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS Ms Chadwick, 21 and Mr Allen, 28 were in a relationship and on 10 March 2007 they departed from their home in Adelaide along with Ms Chadwick’s 5 year old daughter for a trip to the Yorke Peninsula (para 8, 9). Ms Chadwick was at least 9 weeks pregnant at the time (8). The group met up with Mr Martlew, a friend of Mr Allen and his children the following day and continued on in Mr Martlew’s vehicle (9). Throughout the day on 11 March 2007, Mr Allen and Mr Martlew consistently consumed alcohol until the early hours of 12 March 2007(10, 13). Ms Chadwick took over as the designated driver as she was pregnant and sober and they arrived later that day in Port Victoria (11).…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harco Case Study

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Harco is reporting this loss is currently on trial in Los Angeles, CA. This loss involves a wrongful death action of a 16 year old male passenger on the insured’s bus (open air double decker) in Los Angeles CA. The claimant was attending his friends sweet sixteen party, where the friends’ parents (Schlossberg), charted the tour bus from the insured. During the tour, it is alleged, the mother (Mrs. Schlossberg) of the girl hosting the party provided alcohol to the minors and left them unsupervised. At some point during the tour the bus entered the freeway and was traveling at approximately 55 mph.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hae Min Jeny Case Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Serial is a 12 episode podcast based around the murder of Hae Min Lee and her alleged killer Adnan Syed who was convicted for it. In this shocking podcast there was a view into the prosecution’s tactics and actions that shocked many listeners; even the narrator of the podcast itself, Sarah Koenig. The prosecution relied primarily on one witness for a majority of their case, due to an absence of evidence. As well, they also used Adnan’s relationships against him. Overall the prosecution’s actions and tactics used to convict Adnan Syed are unethical and unjust and they reflect poorly on the criminal justice system.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, the possibility that one or more people to whom duty of care is owed might not take proper care for his or her personal safety and the person accompanying them , should be taken into consideration by the person who owes a duty of care to others. McLean v.Tedman (1984), March vStramare (Eand M.H) Pty.LTd. (1991).…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To the courts, it was evident that this principle was widely criticized and failed to work as the definition of inherently dangerous was so subjective and vague. Thus in the MacPherson case, Justice Cardozo scrapped the inherently dangerous policy and replaced it with the foreseeable negligence clause. The Brown decision, Strauss responds has similar parallels and thus is not a never before seen overstepping of judicial power. In the Brown case, we observe a civil rights legal…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alee V. Bob’s Negligence Negligence requires a showing that a duty was owed, that the duty was breached, and that the breach was the actual and proximate cause of damages Special Duty- Land Occupier/Invitee A special duty arises in circumstances involving a land occupier. An invitee is one who enters upon the land of another with the owner’s permission for the purpose related to the activity.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But for the defendant’s negligent act, plaintiff would not have been…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Analysis – Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna Facts The respondent (Zaluzna, plaintiff) slipped and fell due to wet weather causing the floor to become, ‘wet or moist, in a supermarket foyer owned by the appellant (Australian Safeway Stores, defendant). The fall caused injuries to the respondent, in which she sued for damages resulting of negligence, and a breach of the general duty of care, and the special duty of care owed by an occupier to an invitee. Zaluzna sued for damages in the Supreme Court, appealing to the Full Court following.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garrett Vs Fisher

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I represent the Respondent, and request of the court to affirm the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The legal standard is intermediate scrutiny. In order to disprove negligence, the challenged classification must serve an important state interest and is at least substantially related to serving that interest.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Legal Case Study

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. That on or about April 2nd, 2013 the Plaintiff was asked by Defendant James Dwight Coombs to Transport Household Appliances and Items, with the Plaintiff’s Truck and Trailer only, a Conditional reasonable agreement was made with Defendant James Dwight Coombs over the phone, the morning of said incident. Defendant Benny Hans Sorensen Communicated with the Plaintiff later in the day asking the Plaintiff to make another trip, to move more said Items. The Plaintiff communicated with the Defendant Benny Hans Sorensen that he could not lift, and was disabled, the Plaintiff would only be there with for the Truck and Trailer to Transport any Household said items.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pbins 401 Assignment

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The term negligence would apply in a situation where someone did not use the level of care or skills that another would ordinarily have used in a similar situation (Phillips, 2013). Alternatively, malpractice is considered the “careless performance of duty” and requires that the expected delivery of a level of care equal to educational capability, a deviation from that training occurred and someone was directly harmed by the action or inaction which was incongruent with training received to perform the duty (Phillips, 2013, p. 39). Moral Principles in Decision Making A way to guide our ethical practice is essential.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Niles had every right to file a lawsuit against the City of San Rafael because there was a breach of duty that caused foreseeable damage to the Kelly. If Kelly would have suffered no harm, then that would have not been grounds to sue. Mr. Niles won the case because he was able to prove that all four elements of negligence were present. Mr. Niles was able to prove that duty of care was not properly conducted. Duty is defined as the legal obligation of care, performance, or observance to safeguard the rights of others.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Negligence tort occurs when one fails to demonstrate the kind of care a prudent and reasonable person would take under the identical circumstances and injury was birthed from the act or the absence of it. In order to justify that the defendant was negligent and therefore liable for one’s injuries, all 5 elements of tort ought to be satisfied. The 5 elements are: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact, Proximate Cause and damages Jane v Luke Since Jane has suffered injuries, she in immediately classified under a primary victim. The first element is duty, whether it was owed to the plaintiff. The law acknowledges the relationship between the defendant and plaintiff, and the existing relation in turn may justify that the defendant is obliged to…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was held that the manufacturer owed the claimant duty of care and ever since, it was advised that all cases of the same matters should be assessed using this case. If a claimant wants the court to believe that indeed the defendant was negligent, he needs to prove that the defendant owed him duty of care that is the question of whether the defendant had knowledge. If that is proved, then the claimant should prove that the defendant was in breach of that duty and that the breach of duty caused damage. Let us take for instance the case of Caparo v Dickman (1990). Caparo Industries purchased shares in Fidelity Plc in reliance of the accounts which misstated that the company had made a pre-tax profit of £1.…

    • 2739 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The breach of the duty of care must be the legal cause of the harms suffered by the injured person. There are two typed components of legal causation which are the actual cause and proximate cause. Actual cause exists when but for the breach of the duty of care, the injured person would not have suffered an injury. Proximate cause exists when the type and extent of the injured person’s injuries were reasonably related to the breach of the duty of care. The fourth element is injury.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays