Thomas Hobbes Research Paper

Improved Essays
Thomas Hobbes is a political philosopher known for seeking the philosophical basis of lasting peace. Hobbes is known for his philosophical theories, specifically his social contracts theory. In this paper I will argue how a certain passage from Thomas Hobbes reflects on his main argument of that human beings will never come completely together and agree on how they can all live together.
The passage from Hobbes that I will be responding to says, “Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man; the same is consequent to the time, … and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes 70). After reading this passage I suggest that Hobbes is saying that the citizens of the state
…show more content…
Hobbes suggests specifically that society will function best with a Sovereign, which is best described as the referee of society. The Sovereign’s task is to assure the citizens follow the rules. Referring back to our first lecture on Thomas Hobbes we were shown a quote stating, “The felicity of this life, consisteth not in the repose of a mind satisfied. For there is no such utmost aim, nor greatest good, as is spoken of the books of the old moral philosophers.” This quote supports my acquisition that Hobbes believes that human beings are selfish and work to do things in their best interest as it explains that humans see each other as competition and that they always want to beat the other person. An example of the competition between humans in everyday life would be getting the better parking spot on campus since it is in best interest for yourself to get the parking spot closer to your destination. This quote also means that Hobbes believes that humans are creatures that we have needs that are never fulfilled, as we won’t stop until we get the next best thing. For example, if I got a brand new computer for my birthday, I would be thrilled for the first couple of weeks and then would become less satisfied with it, leading me to want the newest computer. This reflects back to Hobbes main

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Hobbes view, if the sovereign can easily be overthrown, then you don’t really have a sovereign. They are, in a sense, immune (something close to a dictator). For Hobbes, where there is no rule there is no justice. Without a legal system in place, there is no conception of justice. The only way to make sure our selfishness doesn’t get out of control is an absolute…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, many different countries have had many different governments. Cicero describes several basic forms of political governments such as kingdoms, aristocracy, and democracies. However, Cicero believed that was another kind of government that could could mix all of these ideas together to make a better government, this was called a commonwealth. Thomas Hobbes also talked about a commonwealth, but his ideas were different from Cicero’s. Some have even stated that the United States is not a democratic commonwealth, which seems to be true.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes’ maintains humans have a “natural condition,” which may be either blissful or brutish. Given such condition, Hobbes asks, how members of society to act/ought to be. Intuitively many philosophers agree members of a society existing blissfully is not only preferred, but better. And, if we grant what is better for society captures that which is good for a society, then individuals ought to act according to the promotion of this peaceful societal end. One objection to Hobbes comes from whether an individual has the right to opt-out of the contract.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes the source of conflict is self-preservation (p. 9), meaning that even though various causes of conflict appear in the state of nature, the underlying cause of conflict is self-preservation. He believes not only do humans want to survive in the present, but also they want to ensure their survival in the future. In order to survive in the future, humans need resources which leads to violent conflict with others. Hobbes paints a very messy picture of life. He explicitly states the need for a social contract, so that people aren’t always in conflict with one another (p. 13).…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle states that the polis allows for man to have the best life, and thus they naturally choose to live in it through the usage of reason. Similarly, Hobbes holds that the natural law is what leads us to forming a polis. The natural law states that man should do anything possible to extend his own life, this means creating peace. To Hobbes the only way to create peace is through having a sovereign, which in the process has individuals give up all their rights to the sovereign, except there right to protection of one’s own self. The sovereign therefore allows for peace which makes it the best possible place for individuals to live.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes is implying that humans do not have self-restraint and…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes argues that the sovereign’s power has no limit, as they are responsible for the security and defense of their subjects at whatever cost deemed necessary. He advocated for the monarchy being reinstituted as an absolute authority; it would be the guiding head, or “artificial soul”, of the “artificial man” composed of the commonwealth that is “of greater stature and strength than the natural [man]”. This Leviathan is crucial for the maintenance of peace. Man’s “natural condition” is equal “in the faculties of the body and mind” as what someone lacks in strength they may make up in wits, and they are naturally in competition for gain, safety, and reputation in a state of nature that is innately violent. Hobbes postulates that without “a…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘For Hobbes, the purpose of politics is to escape war. As such, he insists that in order to establish a democratic political order, all individuals need to hand over their will to a single point of ultimate authority’ (Field, 2015). Due to their beliefs on human nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli shared comparable principles with regards to the need of a sovereign ruler, and the requirement for a functioning supreme power in order to control the people. In the enlightenment period in which Hobbes wrote in his book the Leviathan about the human nature of people, he, similarly to Machiavelli, described that they were selfish and war-prone. Hobbes believed that people are not born with the understanding of what was right…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes Beliefs

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes believes that it is in man’s nature to be inconsiderate, selfish and greedy. In many instances man always considers the ‘I’ first which is not a wrong thing but in all those cases it is through other people, it can be servants or workers, through which the ‘I’ desires can be fulfilled. Therefore the need to consider other people is then eliminated even before the plans are put to action. ‘we not only have desires and beliefs but also the capacity to evaluate those desires and beliefs’(Daims 2005:27).The author makes it a point that man can do wrong things while in the same time finding it to be unjust. He goes on to describe Man as ‘moral animals’.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The biggest bully becomes the leader of the government and keeps people safer than they would be in the state of nature. The people will stay in line because having the sovereign in control gets them out of the bad state of nature. Simply put, we get scared, and then we want the government to fix it- to make it go away, however, the government needs more power to do so, so we give it to them so we can feel safe. The purpose of government to Hobbes is safety, and the government can do whatever it wants to as long as it keeps people safer than they would be in the state of nature. Hobbes believes that government isn’t limited by anything.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that humans should strive for peace above all things but war is nessesary when lives are threatened. Hobbes does claim that humans in the state of nature are all equals. The state of nature is what Hobbes decribes as a place without any government and caotic. Naturally men exist in a state of equality, where everyone is for themselves.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The writings of Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes Although the ideal societies of Machiavelli and Hobbes may have been plausible solutions to political violence in their respective eras, neither man’s ideas translate particularly well to a creating a peaceful society in the present day. In The Leviathan, Hobbes outlines his rationale for creating a society that is ruled by a sovereign (or “Leviathan”) who is given complete power by the people. According to Hobbes, the existence of this all-powerful sovereign prevents sinful human nature from running rampant and destroying peaceful society.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays