To summarize the column by Thomas Friedman, he is just saying arguments about how Trump is not well fitted for president. Obviously, these arguments are his opinion and are not a hundred percent correct; although he is very educated. Friedman uses a lot of ethos, pathos, logos in his argument to try and persuade his audience (anyone reading this column.) He constantly uses the phrase "how do we put in the Oval Office..." and follows with a fact about Trump. Friedman is mostly one sided and only talks about is arguments bashing Trump and focuses little on Clinton, which can be an issue when someone wants another perspective. An opposing view from Michelle Malkin of National Review is very conservative, focusing on Clinton's problems. She uses
