How Does Hobbes Betray His Science

Great Essays
Prompt: Some critics have claimed that Hobbes’s political theory betrays his science (if we are so rational, for example, why is the best government an absolute monarchy?) Is this claim true or false? Or is it true in part and false in part?

I. Introduction

i. Opening remarks

Thomas Hobbes is by far and large considered to be the founding father of modern political philosophy. Any political conflict can be assimilated into elements that have roots in his ideas. He was a part of a ‘new breed’ of political thinkers who eschewed their works from theological platforms, unlike prior Aristotelian thinkers. A special feature of his work is his incorporation of a scientific style to study human nature. Hobbes gets his evidence from introspection,
…show more content…
The rights in the common-wealth are surrendered to the ‘Leviathan’ implying that all the citizens are compelled to follow the sovereign’s commands pertaining to their defense (121). A key argument that Hobbes makes here is that in a situation where a man is severely displeased with his government, and if he begins acting in a way that is countercurrent to the wishes of the monarch (he is specific about the type of sovereign body in this case), the results shall be more detrimental to the society, as the good fortune of every man in a sovereign body aggregates to the prosperity of the monarch, therefore guaranteeing that there can be no situation where a monarch acts in such an oppressive manner (128). To Hobbes, the worst case scenario is “a Civill warre; or that dissolution condition of masterlesse men, without subjection to Lawes, and a coercive power to tye their hands from rapine, and revenge” (128). It is easy to see where Hobbes is coming from, in that his thought experiment would ideally make sense, and his argument of the monarch wanting his greater good to a greater extent is what happens even in reality. But if we were to consider Hobbes’s words as Gospel, then should society willingly surrender large portions of their income and go down to bare necessity level just because they know that the alternative is worse? Should society give up their right to protest and disagree just …show more content…
“A free man, is he, that in those things, which by his strength and wit he is able to do, is not hindered to doe what he has a will to” To tie up Hobbes’s idea of ‘freedom’, they can be termed as ‘non commitment’ and ‘non obstruction’.

ii. Relationship between fear and liberty
“Fear and liberty are consistent (146)”. “ So a man sometimes pays his debt, only for feare of Imprisonment, which because no body hindered him from detaining, was the action of a man at liberty.(146)”. Hobbes says that one is only truly free when he has surrendered his fear and power to the Leviathan, otherwise he lives in the state of nature fear is prevalent. The subjects should not have fear since the Leviathan should protect them. It is important to note here, that in reality the Leviathan is not divine, therefore it is impossible for it to completely protect its subjects, why does Hobbes not acknowledge that? iii. Extent of liberty
“When the words free and liberty are applied to anything but bodies, they are abused (146)”. “Every act of mans will, and every desire and inclination proceedeth from some cause, and that from another cause, in a continuall chaine, they proceed from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    government. Hobbes ideas impact our daily lives mainly his belief that states that the people should give up some of their rights to a more absolute power to protect them and regulate the society around them. This idea is known as a social compact or contract that states that, in their natural state, Hobbes believed that people would fight only for their self-interest and attack those who were in pursuit of their interests. The only way to stop people from engaging in this natural act was to create a government that would enforce the law and protect people from their state of nature. Hobbes negative view towards the nature of humans parallels that of the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many of Hobbes’ ideas are derived from the basic assumption that all humans are intrinsically selfish. We are all born relatively equal in our physical and intellectual capacities and so we are constantly striving to be better than others. This comes with being an autonomous individual. We are all responsible for ourselves, so the next logical step is to serve ourselves. He is a materialist, so he does not believe in any form of a higher, divine being.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are two interesting facts about him? Hobbes believed that humans were all naturally selfish and wicked after seeing the English Civil War. He believed in absolutism, the belief that all power should be vested into one ruler, which many people didn’t agree with. He was also the tutor of the exiled prince of Whales.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How does Hobbes’s view of nature shape his political theory? Political theories make suppositions about nature and/or natural laws. These boundaries (including the behaviors of the people within it) shape actions and decision-making, and the rules of nature thusly form the foundation of the ideology. It is prudent to analyze in-depth this basis for the moral and political philosophy of the great thinkers. The assumptions must make sense if the overall theory of thought built upon this foundation is to hold up.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states that “in order to live a more contented life… men must give up their freedom to the State” (Document 2). He believed that people were naturally cruel and needed protection from themselves. Hobbes wanted rule by absolute monarchs. He thought it was the only way to keep people in check. His beliefs closely supported how many people thought back then.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that complete freedom will bring chaos to individuals because humans need some sort of leadership, and some believe that freedom brings only opportunities to show how great some people truly are. These two contrasting views on freedom are explained through the philosophical texts and views of Martin Luther King Jr and Thomas Hobbes. Martin Luther King Jr enlightened the entire world with his views in Love, Law and Civil Disobedience and Thomas Hobbes showed the world a new side of political philosophy with his work in Leviathan. In both of these works one can see the contrasting views on freedom and can judge what influenced these views based on the time period that these philosophers lived.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the early modern periods when Hobbes lived, claims according to which political power originated from a divine or predetermined condition were accompanied by limitations on political rights of people. Hobbes was original, in that he used his argument in support of such ruling families by urging people that some liberty has to be given up and hence vouching for absolute…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘For Hobbes, the purpose of politics is to escape war. As such, he insists that in order to establish a democratic political order, all individuals need to hand over their will to a single point of ultimate authority’ (Field, 2015). Due to their beliefs on human nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli shared comparable principles with regards to the need of a sovereign ruler, and the requirement for a functioning supreme power in order to control the people. In the enlightenment period in which Hobbes wrote in his book the Leviathan about the human nature of people, he, similarly to Machiavelli, described that they were selfish and war-prone. Hobbes believed that people are not born with the understanding of what was right…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This, the right of execution, is given up to the government in exchange for preservation of the other three natural rights. Hobbes views the state of nature as not a good place. He thinks of it as short and brutal. Weaker people can gain up on the stronger people. This makes everyone feel like they have a chance to get what they want.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Justice. It is at the heart and soul of the American ideology. We believe there is no such thing as a civil society without it. We fought a revolution to free ourselves from the laws of an unjust king.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    70). This “social contract” would obviously be followed since no one would want to live in a world of selfishness forever, therefore Hobbes suggested the people create an absolute monarch, to ensure the safety of all. Abiding to the social contract would eventually lead to mutual transferring, which ensured that, “... he that promises only, because he has already received the benefits for which he has promises, is to be understood as if he intended the right should pass…” (Ball et al. 75). Hobbes concluded that if society followed what he proposed, then society would stay away from civil war and live in peace.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays