The Veil Of Ignorance

Improved Essays
Essentially, Rawls argues that if everyone were asked to design a just society, but would be attributed a position randomly in that society, everyone or nearly everyone would seek to protect themselves. However, if those individuals remove themselves from society (orginal position) then they must design their system behind what Rawls calls the Veil Of Ignorance. Rawls claims that rational people will adopt his principles of justice if their reasoning is based on general considerations, without knowing anything about their own personal situation or environment. Such personal knowledge might tempt them to select principles of justice that give them unfair advantages.
From what I understand, the idea behind this is that people will end up creating

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Before Rawls’s conception of justice and the difference principle, the utilitarian principle was often used in politics justifying inequalities if they made all of us better off. Rawls twist on this is that it is not enough that it should make all of us better off it must make the worst off as well off as possible. Rawls believed in justice…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main distinguishing component of the original positions the veil of ignorance. Rawls’ suggests us to imagine ourselves having no idea about who we are and where we stand in society. By being ignorant to our circumstances we can decide what will benefit our society without any bias…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass incarceration also creates a social hierarchy with Blacks being at the bottom because of being labeled a drug addict/user and a criminal, which in Rawls’ perspective is an injustice because its placing certain individuals higher than others. Rawls would view the situation the same as he viewed distribution of wealth and income, except the moral inquiry would now be the distribution of a negative good which would be punishment among individuals pertaining particularly to certain racial groups. Therefore, if Rawls proposed a solution, it would be that although there would still be some type of punishment institution to house those who are a severe threat to the community in order to protect society, we would choose arrangements that would respect the humanity of each individual. Also he would also examine the “social division of responsibility” between society and individuals. For example when we are about to arrest or convict an individual for possessing or deal drugs, one must also consider everything to ensure that each individual continues to face a decent opportunity for a good life.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Veil of Ignorance John Rawls proposed a strategy, which he called the veil of ignorance, for figuring out which social traditions were simply and which were out of line. The veil of ignorance foundation is as per the following: a lead is simply if everybody would consent to it given that they were made unmindful of their position in the public arena. That is, the fair society would be picked by individuals who had put aside contemplations of their own sex, riches, race, parentage, etc. In a perfect world this rule wipes out individual inclination from the decision and therefore ensures the reasonableness of principles. In any case, even behind the veil of ignorance there won't be accord as to which rules are ideal, tossing into question the…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am here to discuss the reasons why the individual would choose to pick life without possibility of parole in the case of a robber killing a store owner and being charged with 2nd degree murder. With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon. After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5 To set a common standard viewpoint by which to judge the various means of allocating what Rawls calls primary goods, such as rights, powers, opportunities, income, wealth, and the bases for self-respect, he postulates a "veil of ignorance" that assumes that one's position and situation in life is not known. " "To ensure the values of a constitutional democracy, which Rawls feel is the best kind of government since it allows for pluralism as well as stability, a constitutional consensus must be achieved through equal rights, a public disclosure on political matters, and a willingness to…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Conception Of Unequal

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Rawls theory of “general conception of justice” is that all primary social goods are to be distributed equally unless an unequal distribution is to the benefit of everyone. Because of the fact that each person would wish to advance their own conception of primary goods, in the original position they don’t know what these are, each person would find it rational to maximize his share of primary goods and would find it reasonable to not ask for more or feel like are they settling for less than any other person an expect for others to be just as equal as them. So the over all idea is the equal shares between everyone. Likewise, with the “special conception” Rawls brings into the argument the “difference principle”. This principle brings in the…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Police Value Training

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rawls speaks on the ethical concept of “Justice as fairness”. He believes that justice should equal fairness. Yet, there are police officers being judge and jury when they practice the law because they have no ethical training. How is that giving the people a fair justice? It is not.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls in his book Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001) characterizes how idealized reasoners, reason in order to validate the two “principles of justice” (42) in a “basic structure” (10) leading to a “well-ordered society” (8). The idealized reasoners do some kind of calculation. With the “original position” (14) and the “veil of ignorance” (15) idealized reasoners can understand the “difference principle” (61). This is an important element of creating a well-ordered society. Mills finds issue with how Rawls uses this ideal as something we should follow.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jai’lece McCracken Medical Law & Ethics Term Paper Should Sally be Sterilized Sally Smith is 26 years old and is disabled. Her aunt has gone to court to have the young woman sterilized. Smith opposes the sterilization, but a judge has decided that since Sally “would suffer irreparable psychological damage” if she had a child, she should be sterilized. Should Sally be allowed to have children?…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rawls's Theory Of Justice

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rawls’ theory is based on this veil of ignorance and it will collapse once people cannot think behind the veil in…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nozick's Argument Analysis

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rawls advises that if people would choose a different principle to regulate liberty, such as from a position of self-interest, then the result would be discrimination against some people viz. , those who are not like oneself. The subsequent situation would then be an approval of a reduced liberty for everyone. Therefore, by using the veil of ignorance, and justifying that the people in the original position are “rational and mutually disinterested,” Rawls is able to answer the objection of self-interest (12). The original position reveals that no “rational and mutually disinterested” person would ever agree with discrimination, or potential loss of liberty, if his or her own particular social position, psychological motive, etc. were unknown (Rawls 12).…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless what one’s culture or religious framework might be, there is a communality that allows us to have the capacity for justice that can be differentiated from our personal capacity for the good. If we can agree on the moral structure of notions of freedom and equality and cooperation, then we can agree on the basic structure of a democratic society. If we agree with Rawls on the concept of person in a non-metaphysical way and the person can grasp what the fair terms of cooperation are and abide by them, then we can have a minimal conception of society. The capacity of the conception of the good does not require that we engage in sophisticated moral thinking, but it requires the capacity to evaluate this scheme as fair (or…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rawl's Theory Of Justice

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the history of philosophy, utilitarianism approach protects the belief that the theory of justice is established on an assumption of ‘utility’ or increase of happiness. The sort of arguments that Rawls appeal in his book A Theory of Justice is an alternative to utilitarianism and he attempts to atonement the preponderance of utilitarianism approach in modern political philosophy. Rawl’s Theory of Justice calls attention to a universal moral and fundamental ideal theory of justice which could be applied by all societies. It seems that Rawls developed Theory at a time when nobody was talking about and when people were asking for maximizing the welfare of the society. His notion of justice was a more fundamental and basis theory to propose a solution for all political and economic…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rawls’s emphasis on the distinction between ideal and non-ideal theory, his preoccupation with impartial justification and the strains of commitment, and his consecutive insistence on differentiating comprehensive and political moral doctrines all testify to his deep concern for offering a theory of justice which takes into account the constraints of real-world implementation. This concern is most clearly present in his claim to have constructed a “realistic utopia”. In his Law of Peoples, Rawls writes that his work is an endeavor to convey a realistic utopia to us here and now. Rawls sees political philosophy as “realistically utopian, that is, as probing the limits of practical political possibility.”…

    • 1899 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays