Those lives were compensated, but each person’s lives had a different price to it. Kenneth Feinberg even confirmed it in his article, “what is the Value of Human Life?” when he says, “after sept. 11 I, confronted the challenge of placing a value of human life by calculating different amounts of compensation for each and every victim” (66). Their families may not have cared for the price because no price could be put on how much pain and grief they were going through. In “The Value of Life” Amanda Ripley writes, “In the end, Angela’s estimated $444,010 award will probably be three time the size of Cheri’s”(59). With this type of estimate it seems like Angela was three times the person that Cheri was. What if Cheri was actually the better person? Whoever decided the estimate are not looking at how it makes the family feel that the person thought Cheri was not as important as Angela. Once again there is another unfair factor to …show more content…
Not all the time but most times they do, there has been million of cases that this has happened. Someone can be at the wrong place at the wrong time. Steve Jobs says in his speech to a graduating class of Stanford University, “Yor time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life” (71). A person can still not know what they want to do in the future or have a solid plan but all of a sudden their death comes. It is unjust of that life of theirs being calculated when they haven’t reached their full perspectives. Then younger people are worth less than the older ones because they have less belongings and don’t have a retirement plan since they did not expect to die that early. The factors just keep rolling on what should be included in the