The Three Concepts In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Improved Essays
The Modern and Post-Modern periods seem to be closely connected with each other because the 20th century marks the time when the former ends and the latter begins (Hoffman, Hoffman, Robison, & Lawrence, 2005, p. 3). Nevertheless, political thoughts are still separated by space and time. They each have a take on how politics should work (and by extension, how life should be). Thus, it is essential to differentiate the concepts by discussing the trends and perspectives set by political thinkers from the two eras. Their views and ideas will be discussed in this paper in relation to the concepts of (a) State, (b) Civil Society and (c) Freedom, in order to subsequently identify the “break” between the two epochs.
MODERN – HEGEL, MARX AND MILL
The point of view that the individual is prior to the state (Courtney, 2012, p. 24) may be seen in this epoch through the discussion of the three concepts by Hegel, Marx and Mill. In Friedrich Hegel’s the
…show more content…
At a time when the industrial revolution is at its peak or “the epoch of the bourgeoisie” (2002, p. 220) as he calls it, civil society is rife with the class struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat over political, economic and social power (Marx & Engels, 2002). Since the state is a bourgeois State due to its domination by the bourgeoisie/capitalists, there is an inequality due to private property. As Marx said, “…private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths” (2002, p. 237). Only with the abolition of private property will there be a “‘complete emancipation of all human senses and qualities’” (Jones, 2002, p. 138) i.e. Freedom. Thus, freedom is equated with the emancipation of the proletariat through abolishing private property (Marx & Engels, 2002, p.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The famous political texts Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes and The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke have had a profound impact on what is seen to be the role of government in society, with the latter having more lasting influence, particularly in modern society. The former, in short, argues that men ought to submit themselves and all of their rights to an entity with absolute authority over them, and that no matter how this man, or assembly of men abuses its power, they ought not to resist this entity, as the alternative is a chaotic, violent world. Just by examining the thesis of Hobbes’ work, one would easily deduce that such an idea is contrary to the ideals lauded in our modern society, those being of certain inalienable rights, the rule of law, and the separation/limitation of powers. Locke presents each of these aforementioned ideals and explains them to be essential to governance for the common good.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Communist Manifesto was written in 1848 by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. In the book they explain what communism is and how the concept came to be. It is split into four sections to help explain the different aspects of the Communist party’s ideas and goals. The Manifesto opens with, “A specter is haunting Europe—the specter of communism,” (14). Marx continues on to explain that all of Europe has begun to align themselves together against Communism.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argues that to prevent the exploitation of the proletariat society needs to abolish the class structures that perpetuate the exploitation of the proletariat. Furthermore, Marx believes that the only way to truly abolish these class structures is to abolish the institution of private property because…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx attempts to educate the general public on the communist agenda that emerged in the 19th century. He proposes an arguably attractive explanation to the timeless class struggle in human history, explaining that the laboring proletariat class will eventually rise to political power and eliminate future class division and oppression through the seizure of property ownership. In essence, Marx favors the concept of the unity of the whole, whereas John Stuart Mill in On Liberty argues for the value of the individual and their liberties of thought, discussion, and action. In this essay I will defend Mill in justifying the utilitarian favorability of individuality and liberty rights, because prioritizing communal…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marx suggests that having the right to private property is what causes capitalism to exist in the first place. Capitalism leads to the proletariat becoming heavily dependent on the Capitalist. They have power over the working class, since they own private property, have the ability to gain more resources, capital, and money, which they use to exploit the working class. As Capitalism progresses, class antagonism increases, because the capitalist get wealthier and the people from the proletariat class are transformed into insignificant fragile commodities that are living under increasingly harsh conditions. In order for a class to maintain power and for class struggle to exist, one must have power over the other class.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Miranda Mr. Lara Honors Economics Period 2 19 February, 2016 Communism and Socialism The origin of Communism can be found in 1844, when Karl Marx, a man from Germany who came from Jewish heritage, was introduced to Friedrich Engels. The two believed that capitalism was an evil economic philosophy in which the working-class were exploited by their class-heads (upper-class). In 1848, the two wrote and published a book entitled "The Communist Manifesto", in which they expressed such hatred for capitalism and released their plans for a perfect society (History and Background of Communism, 1). Which entailed private ownership be given up to the government, and that the state worked as a community (Comparing Economic Systems, 1).…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first source is an excerpt from the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx, which demonstrates support for the left-wing ideas of collectivism over the elitist system of individualism. Private property is one of the principles of classical and modern liberalism that is present in most democracies around the world; it is the idea of property, both physical and mental, that is owned by the individual only. Although individualism is intended to bring wealth and rewards for those that are hard working and ambitious, it also limits resources to a select few while draining the majority. This is demonstrated in the lines: “private property is already done away for nine-tenths of the population: its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx sought to abolish the belief system that preserved the uneven distribution of wealth and prolonged the suffering of the proletariat. As a result of the industrial revolution, the upper class exercised its power over the lower classes exclusively for the purpose of protecting self-interest. The labor of the lower classes not only supported their subsistence, but upheld the luxurious existence of the bourgeoisie as well. While the bourgeoisie retained control of the means of production, they entered an agreement with the proletariat to form “the rights of man,” which preserve the rights to life, liberty, and security with the limitation that one man’s rights should not undermine the rights of another. In his effort to outline the implications of “the rights of man,” Karl Marx presents a clear argument that the rights to life, liberty, and security ultimately preserve self-interest and detach man from civil society.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part A: Boyer’s (1998) article argues that the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx is only relevant within the historical context of the 1840s, and not in any other decade of the 19th century. Boyer (1998) then agues that the primary thesis of this argument is that Marx wrote this document during the “hungry” 1840s, which defines a unique period of economic collapse as a timeframe in which communism was an increasingly common idea in the development of European political ideologies (151). More so, the thesis of Boyer’s (1998) article seeks to defame the Communist Manifesto by showing its relationship to the severe economic events of the 1840s, as well as defining how this type of economic collapse was the only time in European history in which…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Paternalism

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The state’s role in an individual’s life is a central idea in political philosophy. J.S. Mill questioned the limits to which the state had the right to interfere with the freedom of an individual. He developed a principle, which centered on the concept of harm caused by one individual against another individual. Mill then used his harm principle to argue against the paternalistic nature of the state. He argued the nature of the state and he also argued its potential role as serving the public with a means to protect them from harm.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau strongly differ on their view of the purpose of the state. Hobbes sees the state as a positive institution that creates order and sows peace. Rousseau sees the state as an institution of chains, that renders it’s citizens salves to the will of the majority. Before reaching these conclusions they argue on the base nature of man. Hobbes argues that self preservation is the base of human nature whereas Rousseau argues it is property.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, the new ruling class, the proletariat, when in control, will abolish the ownership of private property and the classes will disappear (Marx & Engels, 1848). Marx and Engels (1848) state the resulting conflict and revolution can be solved through the adoption of Communism, whereby there are no class distinctions in the society. In the second preamble; ‘Proletarians and Communists’, Marx and Engels explores the relationship between the communism and the working class. They state that the Communism would be organized in favor of the proletariat and focus on their interests rather than those of a specific class (Marx & Engels, 1848). They expound on the characteristics of the Communist…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The “siècle des Lumières” and accompanying French Revolution were, and often still are, characterized as mass movements of antagonism towards faith and religion. As the Catholic faith of the old regime crumbled, the revolutionary spirit of the time promised to do away with orthodoxy and create a new egalitarian society based on freedom. Ideas like these were fueled by the French philosophes, with thinkers like Voltaire referring to orthodox religion as “the mother of fanaticism and civil discord” and “the enemy of mankind” (Gliozzo, 1971, p. 274). However, later critics of the Revolution recognized that, in fact, the secular values of the Revolution had formed their own type of fanatic political theology.…

    • 2216 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays