The Suez Crisis Analysis

Improved Essays
This historical investigation seeks to evaluate and compare the factors influencing the relationships and discussions between France and Britain during the Suez Crisis and thereby provoked them to commit military force to the region. The mainbody will look at the differences and similarities in Britain's and France's intentions in the Middle East, the internal situation (mainly in Britain), Nassers actions, public opinion in Western Europe as well as American and UN policies on the crisis. In order to carry out his investigation a variety of sources will be consulted primary and secondary, from which relevant information will be selected. Carltons "Britain and the Suez Crisis" and Thomas "The Suez Affair" will be of particular use. The sources used reliability (date of publication, author etc) will be discussed. An analysis of the main arguments of the authors as well as an evaluation of different historical interpretations will be carried out. …show more content…
Information given in the book "The Suez Affair" tells us that the company was largely owned by British and French shareholders.

Britain and France saw the Nasser nationalization as a violation of international law and feared that this could create a power of vacuum, which could be filled by the Soviets, who were their communist enemy in the Cold War. Along with this, the nationalization of the canal directly threatened British and French influences in the area, which was rich on oilsupplies and secured Britain's way to India. In a letter to the US President in September 1958, the British Prime Minister Eden

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    These ancient historians share related and also contrasting accounts, sources and ideas on what these causes were. However, it is important to treat these interpretations with caution, in…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Introduction This case study mainly aims to demonstrate an analysis on the relationships between Egypt and other countries based on the Annals of Thutmose III. The discussion will focus on three different regions, which are Syria-Palestine, Nubia and Punt respectively. Apart from the analysis, the origin, genre and content of the annals will be covered briefly in the report.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Document 9 is a neither a primary or a secondary source. It is a newspaper article, it's not even an article it is an editorial. This is merely the opinion of a journalist Document 3 is a pretty reliable source. It is all the options that were discussed in the Excom of the Cuban missile crisis. It is a transcript of what was discussed…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will compare and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Dominique Clément’s “The October Crisis of 1970: Human rights abuses under the War Measures Act”, and Ross Lambertson’s “The Black, Brown, White and Red Blues: The Beating of Clarence Clemons”. Both articles are rich with facts and explore fascinating issues in Canadian human rights history. That being said, this paper will argue that Clément’s article is superior. Clément’s article is better organized with clearer diction and style, and has stronger and more straightforward support for his argument than Lambertson’s article does.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    British Bondholders and the Roosevelt Corollary of the Monroe Doctrine Standing from the present we inhabit, it can be easy to look at the grander moments in history past and forget that they were as much driven by the same interests and complexities that drive similar moments in contemporary politics as well. It is the presence of these such interests that the author J. Fred Rippy hoped to document in his paper The British Bondholders and the Roosevelt Corollary of the Monroe Doctrine, published in 1934 by the Academy of Political Science. In it, he proposes that one of the major driving forces which pushed then-President Theodore Roosevelt to establish his Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine was the pressure put on the State Department…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Of 1812 Analysis

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages

    During the War of 1812, also referred to as the “Second War of Independence”, the U.S declared war on Britain because it felt that the blockage of its ports, and the general interference with the Navy was too bitter a pill to swallow. Additionally, the U.S. was not happy with how searches were carried out on its ships. The Britain also took over the shipping and the U.S. was forced to adhere to their rules. The blockage of ports and interference of the navy is the element that James Madison says covers three quarters of the globe in his 1812 State of the Union…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    All The Shah's Men Essay

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Following World War II, many different countries were left in ruins and began to rebuild, especially in Europe. Iran specifically, was recovering from being invaded by Soviet and British troops after being a neutral country in the war. In the book titled All the Shah’s Men, we get a more focused glimpse on Iran and all the foreign powers influencing the nation. Iran was ruled as a monarchy until 1979, and each king or emperor is given the title of “shah”. Every Shah ruled until death or they were overthrown.…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it ever a good idea to get involved in a violent and problematic situation? The United States has handled conflicts in the Middle East gracelessly from the overthrowing of Prime Minister Mossadegh in Iran, to the involvement in the Iraq-Iran war, and all the way up to the present in how the ISIS dilemma is being handled. Beginning all the way back in 1953, the United States has involved themselves in Middle Eastern affairs hoping to achieve results that affect the country positively. The U.S. started it all upon the overthrowing of the democratically elected Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh in order to install a Shah who was more friendly towards the west. After having gotten tied into their affairs and becoming reliant upon…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is acting to make clear to kidnappers, revolutionaries and assassins that in this country laws are made and changed by the elected representatives of all Canadians -not by a handful of self-selected dictators. Those who gain power through terror rule through terror. The government is acting, therefore, to protect your life and your liberty” (Belanger). This statement, made by Pierre Elliot Trudeau, was a televised statement justifying the Prime Minister’s decision to declare the War Measures Act during the October Crisis of 1970. The October Crisis of 1970 was a civil war between the Canadian government and a separatist group, Le Front de Libération du Québec, otherwise known as the FLQ.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Korean War Analysis

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On March 2, 1917, President Wilson issued a declaration of war against Germany, officially entering World War I that he pledged to keep the country out of. To achieve maximum strength to fight against the Germans, The U.S mobilized the whole nation for war with a draft that including Americans of all races. Many blacks contested World War I, arguing why fight for democracy in Europe while African Americans remain second class citizens in the United States. Others believed that if blacks served their country, the government would have no choice but to reward them with equal rights. Over one million African Americans responded to draft calls, and about 370,000 black men were inducted into the army (Williams, 2011).…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Post revolution America, was a time of turmoil despite America’s victory. The colonists, now free from Britain’s rule had a great deal of work ahead of them, making decisions on how exactly the country should be run with their newfound independence. The founding fathers faced this adversity with the creation of the Articles of Confederation, and in it was everything the states ever wanted with the states retaining a considerable amount of power. Nevertheless, although the Articles of Confederation appeased the states’ wishes, economic deficiency , foreign disputes, and interstate disunity demonstrated America’s inability to improve itself, deeming its loose government as ineffective. America’s economic deficiency portrayed a struggling America…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Remaining neutral, she gives the reader a good chance to see where both sides are coming from but also giving many reasons to contradict the other so that no bias is influencing the reader’s opinion. Meant for any one, aware of this debate or not, she clears the fact this issue has been exaggerated and is indeed affecting…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The twenty years that E.H. Carr focuses this piece of work on is the interwar period of 1919-1939. During this period, Carr seeks to establish that the development of international relations had transgressed toward a moral idealism that would lead to a second world war. Carr compiles this assertion in his criticism of the breakdown of the utopian conception of morality. The transformation of world politics has encouraged the formations of new linkages between the study of change in international relations and the normative consideration of alternative principles of world politics. The author’s objective, he states, “is to analyze the profounder causes of the contemporary international crisis.”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When disaster strikes, regardless of the causation, it falls on the federal government to formulate a means by which to achieve a level of safety for its citizens. In such cases as federal outbreak, different nations may have different means by which to approach said crisis. Both World War I and World War II can a point of reference in the diverging methods they employed in their original strategy to attempting to ensure victory and safety for themselves and their respective allies. In the case of Max Brooks’ World War Z, the faux accounts of the collective of the world’s governments attempting to subdue a zombie outbreak, different nations employ methods to both protect their citizens and repress, if not entirely eliminate, the growing threat.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was being controlled by the Suez company , which British had a huge amount of stock, so they were in semi control. Having said that, it was an anglo-french company. Meaning it was mainly supported/owned by the British and the French. (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica 2017) They also wanted to take back the canal, as I had stated before, the company was partly owned by the British, so Britain wants their canal back.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays