Virginia Tech Shooting Research Paper

Improved Essays
When events as the Virginia Tech shooting and the Colorado movie theater shooting occurred, both made it easy to point fingers at the guns and suggest that the guns killed those people. Yes, a gun was used to commit murder but the person who did the killing was the person behind the gun. In times of crisis it was easy to pick an object as a source of fallacy in the system because it was in our nature to seek the best in humanity. To say that because those individuals had guns, and those guns made them crazy, was a crazy statement in itself. (Gulasekaram, 2010).
A major part of being a responsible gun owner would be safety. The head of a household must be so inclined as to keep one’s family safe from his or her guns as well as from criminals
…show more content…
Heller it was decided that guns could be used in self defense and that the Second Amendment gave people rights to own a firearm; those people were then obligated to decide which types of guns fit in the criteria of being useful and safe. For example, automatic weapons have been banned since this case was presented and semi automatic weapons have been argued about for years. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) data for 2011 indicated that almost 13,000 people were murdered with a weapon. Of those, 1,700 were killed with knives, almost 500 with hammers, bats, and clubs, and 728 by someone’s bare hands. Only 323 people were killed with rifles of all types (Levy, 2013). This number of deaths was surprising to many people that the statistic was not much higher. It has been argued before and will be argued time and time again that people find a way to destroy themselves. Currently in the United States two of the most important cases in the battle for gun rights are District of Columbia vs. Heller and Mcdonald vs. Chicago. Both of these claim that the right to bear arms is “fundamental”; i.e., it is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty and deeply rooted in our nation’s traditions and culture. (Levy, 2013) Throughout history we have seen a pattern of violence, whether it be domestic or foreign. If I were going to protect my family, the best way I know how would be to have a firearm in my home. The government may try to take away my guns but …show more content…
Out of all the other laws and amendments that our founding fathers created they chose to place the right to bear arms as second most important. George Washington believed that while people could have property and the protection of a free government, they should have rights to defend what they have. He also believed that the people should not only be armed but also be disciplined in the knowledge of gun safety and to make sure the purpose for needing a gun did not outweigh a moral good (Bailey, 2013). The founding fathers believed that everything they had put into the Constitution was for the benefit of every American. Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States said, “The greatest danger to American freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution.” If one was to see a modern day reflection of the ways gun control could go wrong, one needed to look at what Adolf Hitler did. He was able to unarm a majority of the population in Nazi Germany and thus the Holocaust, one of the largest human massacres in the history of the world, occurred. The founding fathers feared this would happen at any time from England and that they would lose the freedom they had found in the United

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the midst of his article, Charles M. Blow supplements his argument for stricter gun laws by examining and discussing major shootings in recent U.S. history. In introducing these acts of gun violence, he asserts his claim through the repetition of the phrase, “When we learned, to our great horror,” describing the context of a major shooting after each clause. After explaining the context of each instance, he emphasizes on the point that no significant government action was taken in any of these, thus prompting the nation to step further and further towards the decline of the debate on guns. At the end of this build up, Blow juxtaposes “the blood running through our streets” to the “increasingly unfettered right to bear arms,” proposing the…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And of course, mass shooting victims account for a tiny percentage of the Americans gunned down every year. A majority of children killed by guns are killed by accident, or by their own hand, or by adults, with weapons legally obtained by adults.”. Rosenthal points out that majority of guns that have been used to commit an act of violence was obtained legally, so again the purposed solutions to gun violence will only amount to a minor change to in gun…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professors from Bloomberg School of Public Health Daniel W. Webster and Jon S. Vernick reveled intriguing results from their study. “In addition to the 31,672 people killed by guns in 2010, another 73,505 were treated in hospital emergency rooms for nonfatal bullet wounds, and 337,960 nonfatal violent crimes were committed with guns. Of those 31,672 dead, 61 percent were suicides, and the vast majority of the rest were homicides by people who knew one another”(shermer). It is now know that some Americans in society take their freedom to bare arms for granted. Every day some Americans are being shot, wither it is out of jealously or hate, their lives are on a balance of life or death.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution: Suppression of the 2nd Amendment “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not infringed.” This is the 2nd amendment, and it is under attack. Many people believe that guns are evil and need to banned from the general public. They look at countries such as Australia, Japan, and France to get there reasoning for strict gun control. Advocates for this type of thinking conclude that if America implements the same harsh gun regulations of other countries, then our gun violence rates will reflect theirs.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Americans love guns and Americans hate guns. There is a perplexing relationship within the American people and their desire for guns. American citizens are aware of the danger that follows with gun use, but still advocate to keep them legal within the states. The gruesome massacres that have occurred within American schools such as Columbine, Virginia Tech, as well as the massacre that recently occurred in Orlando, Florida at club Pulse, somehow do not resonate with the fact that this country has a very serious gun problem. The United States must figure out logical ways to make access to guns harder such as disallowing someone who has been on a FBI watch list from ever purchasing weapons.…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The day begins just like any other in a quiet, small town, when out of nowhere a suspicious man enters the local bank and confidently states that this is a holdup. All of the innocent bystanders inside the bank are physically incapacitated initially out of fear as the bank robber brandishes his intimidating firearm while giving directions to the civilians not to move or speak unless exclusively instructed to do so at his command. The man also warns them not to try anything sneaky or else he will be compelled to do something crazy. The suspect makes his way to the bank tellers at which point he aggressively grabs one of the employees by the shirt and demands they empty the vaults and hand over the funds to him. Meanwhile, one of the hostages…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Founding Fathers of the United States wrote the Second Amendment to the Constitution for a reason; to protect the rights of the people. This means that citizens have the privilege and ability to possess a gun and use than gun for lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The government has no right to restrict them in owning guns for this reason. Further amending the right to own a gun would only do more harm than good in the United States. By creating stricter gun control laws, the government would not solve the problem of criminals obtaining weapons and would only take away the protection of the people.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That is one of the most important questions in today's society. Just as there are the two political parties, there are two “parties” to gun control. The citizens in favor of gun ownership, and the freedom to obtain and use guns, are relying on the Constitution. However, the opposing side is relying on the statistics that come from the increasing number of shootings across the nation. Those in favor of gun ownership beleive that it is a fundamental right to own a gun, and it should not be taken away.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most controversial Amendments today is the ‘Right to Bear Arms.’ As I get older, I see life a lot more differently and how the Amendments can either be used in our favor as Americans or hurt us. To be more clear, the ‘Right to Bear Arms’ is the second Amendment of the United States Constitution passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791, the first 10 amendments form the Bill of Right. It is a well regulated Militia; being necessary to the security of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns vs People “ Guns don’t kill people; people kill people”. It is a phrase often heard among the opponents to gun control in the United States. Weapons have been seen as an element of subsistence or defense against any threat, and every day we hear or see related violent crimes involving firearms.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Modern day America has far surpassed any futuristic dreams our nation’s founding fathers could conjure. Does that mean we should change the premises of the laws put in place so long ago to secure this nation’s future? In 1791 James Madison, in response to expressed concerns from several states added to the growing amendment’s in the Bill of Rights to protect the United States from the potential abuse of governmental power (Bill Of Rights Instuitute , 2015). The second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed (Bill Of Rights Instuitute , 2015).”…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Accessibility Policy

    • 1511 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In today’s society, one would not need to protect themselves from a U.S government domestic attack. Additionally, the Constitution was written during a time where the main and only firearms being considered where muskets and small rifles. The framers could not have imagined a world with machine guns and other assault weapons being created. The other two main arguments against gun regulation is for hunting and self defense. Some considers hunting, a staple of American culture.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    So why are guns being blamed for murders? That makes absolutely no sense and that’s because people are misinformed about guns. People need to be informed. Little things like toy-guns that look too much like the actual thing have been banned. Why is this?…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays