positive obligation to ensure that rights are discharged from covenants fully and all the individuals in the society are equally protected.
On the other hand IHL ensures that states protect people during conflicts, prisoners are equally protected and given access to basics, women are not raped or harassed etc. Its state’s positive obligation to make efforts to protect state’s own people from enemy attacks and to take precautionary measures in order to keep civilian areas away from military targets. State must take budgetary, legislative, judicial and administrative measures to make sure that human rights are guaranteed in the society. Economic, cultural and social rights convention demands states to assist in order to achieve the rights given in the convention .
4.2 Responsible Actors …show more content…
In International law there is a huge role of Actors which are held responsible and are bound by the law but these actors that bear the responsibility are different in IHL and IHRL. Both laws have slightly different rules of determining the actors who are responsible. Both laws have differences which are in terms of provision alteration for protection of people and groups, tools to determine group or individuals more bare to the violations, especially in war or conflict zones. Minor differences along with the tools to determine level of threat to rights in certain groups are considered as the differences in IHL and IHRL when it comes to actors who are responsible. Both laws have major common ground where obligations are imposed on non-state actors and states for being the responsible
On the other hand IHL ensures that states protect people during conflicts, prisoners are equally protected and given access to basics, women are not raped or harassed etc. Its state’s positive obligation to make efforts to protect state’s own people from enemy attacks and to take precautionary measures in order to keep civilian areas away from military targets. State must take budgetary, legislative, judicial and administrative measures to make sure that human rights are guaranteed in the society. Economic, cultural and social rights convention demands states to assist in order to achieve the rights given in the convention .
4.2 Responsible Actors …show more content…
In International law there is a huge role of Actors which are held responsible and are bound by the law but these actors that bear the responsibility are different in IHL and IHRL. Both laws have slightly different rules of determining the actors who are responsible. Both laws have differences which are in terms of provision alteration for protection of people and groups, tools to determine group or individuals more bare to the violations, especially in war or conflict zones. Minor differences along with the tools to determine level of threat to rights in certain groups are considered as the differences in IHL and IHRL when it comes to actors who are responsible. Both laws have major common ground where obligations are imposed on non-state actors and states for being the responsible