The Role Of Young Offenders In The Criminal Justice System

Improved Essays
The rights of young offenders provide several challenges for the criminal justice system, as an effective outcome must reflect society’s belief that the welfare of children is paramount, as outlined by the Convention of the Rights of the Child (1989/90). However, this must be balanced with the need for young people to be held accountable for their actions, so there are no injustices for the victims or society.

The criminal justice system attempts to ensure effective outcomes for young people through the ruling of doli incapax. The law as it stands in NSW sets out a conclusive presumption of the age of criminal responsibility as being ten years of age and those aged 10-14 also incapable of criminal intent unless proven otherwise. While this presumption of doli incapax under the Children’s (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) aims to prevent young persons from making uninformed life decisions from limited
…show more content…
The Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) sets out the rights of young offenders as the law assumes that they may not be aware of their rights or may be vulnerable during the process. During questioning a young person is entitled to the right to silence, right to have a responsible adult present and to not be strip searched under ten years or otherwise have an adult present between 10-18 years. During the arrest and interrogation process, a young person must have a responsible adult present, have access to free legal aid and advice over the phone, the right to silence and have a police custody manager assisting the accused. Police are obliged to receive the court’s permission to fingerprint and photograph those under 14 and present a caution to the young offender, notifying them that any said can be used against them. These rights are effective in upholding the protection and reducing the vulnerability of the young

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Over time, most courts have taken the position that the juvenile record of a defendant can be taken into consideration by a judge when considering an appropriate sentence for a now adult offence. As such, this case is groundbreaking in the way that juvenile records are considered in court proceedings (People,…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children committing heinous crimes are not a rare occurrence anymore; the upsetting reality requires new tactics for dealing with young juveniles. Some Americans believe children should be tried as adults, yet others feel that they are too young to understand their wrong doings. In most conditions minors are quickly told they are too young or too old for something, however before being sent to an adult facility we need to contemplate all aspects of the case in order to decided whether or not being tried as an adult is necessary. Regardless of the crime, some people feel that an adult facility is not a suitable environment for children to serve their sentences.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the modern legal system, most jurisdictions view a person as an adult at 18 years of age. Until a person reaches this age, they are less likely to receive the full extent of a jurisdiction’s legal system. At certain parts in a child’s life, age can be used as a valid defense. If a person is under 7 years of age, they will not be charged in most jurisdictions. From the age of 7 to the age of responsibility, which is usually recognized as 16 but varies by jurisdiction, an offender can be tried in the juvenile system (criminal Law Today).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marin Sinzer Case Study

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While the “criminal is a child” approach to the juvenile justice system is appealing due to its forgiving nature and emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment, there are some cases in which this decision is not so cut-and-dry. One of these instances of a legal “gray area” is the case of Marin Sinzer, who was charged for the murder of Tammy Shevin, 25 years after the crime was committed. The now 38 year old is petitioning to be tried as a juvenile, since he was only 13 at the time of the crime, a year younger than the waiver age at the time. While many proponents of the “criminal is a child” approach take that stance because of the physical and psychological dangers posed to juveniles who are placed in adult prisons, in this unique…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Literature review Amending the youth criminal justice act, 2007-2012 Dynamics and contingencies Rehabilitation of young offenders Mann, R. M. article "Amending the youth criminal justice act, 2007-2012 Dynamics and contingencies", focuses on protecting the public and holding teens responsible for their actions. It gives a brief understanding about how the Youth Criminal Justice Act aims to divert minors away from the courts. To add this article provides a wide range of rehabilitation methods for young offenders such as interventions. It mentions how the Youth Criminal Justice Act was amended in 2007. The government wanted stricter laws to hold teens accountable for their crimes.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of whether or not minors under the age of 18 should be treated differently when being read their rights has come up in the current news. There are differences between minors and adults, “Children are different from adults. The Supreme Court has in other contexts concluded that children cannot be viewed as "mini adults" under the law because they lack the maturity and foresight to understand the full consequences of their actions. The same holds true when they are considered suspects and are being questioned by law enforcement officers,”(“How Should Police Read…”).…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles as young as 14 are being positioned in prisons with adults from minimum to maximum prisons. A minimum prison would house offenders who have committed a minor offense such as theft, while a maximum prison house felonies who have engaged in activities such as rape or murder. In 2005, the Supreme Court banned the death penalty ruling “people under 18 are immature, irresponsible, susceptible to peer-pressure and often capable of change (Scott, 2012).” Although, the court recognizes juveniles are immature, irresponsible, and susceptible to peer-pressure yet juveniles remain housed with adults. “For instance, several studies have reported a greater probability of recidivism for juveniles processed in the adult justice system compared with…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile law is typically governed by the state and most states set the age for criminal culpability at eighteen (deferring between seventeen and nineteen in some cases) (Walsh, 2016). The founders of the juvenile court saw it as “a system of justice that would protect youth from potential harms of adult court and that seek to not only punish but also to advance the ‘best interests’ of youth.” The juvenile court, unlike adult court, is guided by parens patriae, which is Latin for “state as parent.” The juvenile court is set up to act as the parent and it can punish and dismiss cases how it seems is appropriate, while also seeking to help juveniles in a way that can lead them to live productive lives (Mears, Kuch, Lindsey, Siennick, Pesta, Greenwald & Bloomberg,…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the criminal justice system, there are many varying elements that contribute to the process through which accused offenders are counseled. As is expected, there are also numerous moral and ethical disputes that come with the territory, such as whether or not children, or 'juveniles', should be tried as adults in court for the violent crimes they commit. Some may say any child over the age of five should know the difference between right and wrong; for an individual to plan out a crime and act on it, the punishment should fit the offense, no matter the age. However, there is a thin line between vice and neurosis when it comes to juveniles. The incarceration of individuals under the age of sixteen at adult correctional facilities…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    "But he did not go to jail nor was he required to register as a sex offender. Instead he was sentenced to probation and sent back to live with his parents, two doors down from the victim" (Goldmark and Newton 2). Heather Newton is highly respected because of her many accomplishments; her novel Under the Mercy Trees was the winner of the 2011 Thomas Wolfe Memorial Literary Award, SIBA Okra Pick, and the Women’s National Book Association Great Group Reads Selection. Despite the level or sophistication of the offence, many minors are charged as juveniles, and this is just because of their ages. The severity of the crime should decide this (Goldmark and Newton 5).…

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The minimum age a child can be held criminally responsible for an offence committed is a heavily debated topic universally, especially in the history of Australia to whom rectified the minimum age of criminal responsibility laws various times (Weijers and Grisso 2009). Globally the story is much the same as there is no mandatory minimum age that a child can be held responsible for there actions (Australian institute of criminology 2000), but rather their have been universally recognised rules within the United Nations Convention on the rights of a child that establishes that a child 's wellbeing must be imperative in a legal process such as in the courts (Australian institute of criminology 2000). Further on the global consensus, sovereign…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Should juveniles be jailed for life? The young juvenile defendant wearing a tattered bright orange jumpsuit was glumly staring at his greasy sweaty hands. Beside him, his suave and professional lawyer was repetitively clicking his pen in nervousness. The judge was about to give the verdict.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile Vulnerabilities

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    INTRODUCTION In forty-eight states a child of seventeen has the opportunity for their misdemeanor to go to a juvenile court, them to be reprimanded, and then their file sealed so as to give them the chance to succeed in life. This honors the idea that young adults are not, in fact, adults. From brain chemistry to peer pressure, adolescents have several vulnerabilities unique to their age. In New York and North Carolina, however, they are automatically tried as an adult at the age of sixteen (Raise 2015) -- with no consideration of the severity of their crime, little consideration to their physical and emotional vulnerabilities, and no thought to the damage that such a criminalization causes.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults for it is wrong to hold adolescents, under the legal age, to adult standards. If children do not even receive the same rights as adults in the first place, it makes no sense to try them in adult court. These juveniles should have the opportunity to be rehabilitated in a positive manner, for they tend to come from troubled households and violent neighborhoods. In over half of the cases these troubled kids don’t know any different way than a life of crime when surrounded by both social and environmental factors that influence their delinquent actions. One must commemorate that juveniles are mentally underdeveloped, and still have time to innovate if their issues are dealt with precisely and accurately.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    17 Year Olds Case Study

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Queensland Law Society has repeatedly called for changes to the new legislation 17 year olds are considered children in every other aspect of the law why treat them as adults only when they commit a crime. Sending 17 year olds to adult correctional centres is extremely emotionally and physically damaging. Queensland University of Technology 's School of Justice senior lecturer, Dr Kelly Richards, said young people in adult prisons were at a massively increased risk of emotional harm, psychological harm, physical abuse, and sexual abuse. The harm caused to 17 year olds in prison is extremely detrimental to their health and well-being. The money spent sending 17 year olds to jail should be invested into rehabilitation programs rather then just sending juvenile offenders to prison, the money should be put into well implemented programs that can rehabilitate young offenders.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays