The Role Of The Anti-Federalists

Improved Essays
During the 1780s, a plan for a new Constitution that would completely change the American government was put into action. However, this caused a disagreement between the people which formed two opposing parties on the idea of a new constitution. The Anti-Federalists wanted strong state governments and a weak central government, and the Federalists wanted the exact opposite of that. Although I prefer to have a balanced mix between the two, I would have to side with the anti-federalists. One of the main concerns of the anti-federalists were the power of the people: “The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution would create a regime that would fail to cultivate the kind of citizens that republican government requires” (17). They fear that

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    When the founding fathers were writing the constitution, there was much debate as to how strong they would allow the central government to become. For the Anti-Federalists in particular, it was important that the Constitution ensured the oppression the Americans had experienced under British rule could not be repeated. The purpose of Madison writing Federalist No. 51 was to convince Anti-Federalists, particularly those concentrated in New York, that the constitution would prevent the government from becoming too strong. If it were not ensured that the three branches of government would be independent of one another, and that a checks and balances system would be in place, it would have been more difficult for the constitution to have been ratified.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the three branches of government were coming into existence, one could only hope that the Founding Fathers intended them to help serve balance in our government rather than give opportunities for certain people to oppress a minority or weaker entity. There is an emphasis on hope because history has confirmed our government’s capacity to corrupt circumstances of power for statesman and tyrants alike. Both the Federalists and Anti-federalists cast arguments against the system, deeming certain qualities of its structure with more merit than others. Of course, there were political agendas connecting too many aspects of special interests and political corruptness, however, the assembly and arrangement of particular checks on each power in each…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States constitution was signed and approved by the constitutional convention delegates in 1787, and it needed ratification from nine states as it is required in article VII of the constitution before it could be enforced. States that decided not to ratify the constitution will be considered a different country, and not part of the union. With this knowledge, the urge of the ratification led to a conflict among the delegates that resulted in numerous documents, essays, pamphlets, and articles. The conflict; perhaps debate consists of two opposing sides; the Federalists who wanted the ratification of the constitution, and the Anti-Federalists objected to the ratification. The Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton were in favor of…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist and anti-Federalist parties disagreed as to how much power the national authority needed, both parties agreed that a national authority was needed and that the national authority would require an individual source of income to function as it should. Both the Federalist and the anti-Federalist Parties also agreed that the people needed protection against dictatorship and other forms of tyranny. Even though neither party completely liked every part of the Constitution, both parties could agree that overall the Constitution was the “best document obtainable”. Federalists were the young, educated men who supported the idea of a centralized federal system and the Constitution’s ratification. They liked the fact that the Constitution could have a “broad interpretation” when situations arose that required such flexibility.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political parties have grown through the years, but how does one measure the success of them. George Washington had advised the nation to try and avoid them due to the possibility that it would divide everyone. Revolutionary War had just ended, and unity was still fragile and delicate. Even so, there were two parties that dominated the nation, Federalists and anti-Federalists. In many ways, the Federalists were successful because many of their party ideas about a strong central government is included in the Constitution.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was the product of the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists debates. These two groups fiercely disagreed more over the means than the ends. Both sides acknowledged that a stronger national authority was needed and that such an authority required an independent source of revenue to function properly. They also both agreed that safeguards against tyranny need to be established. But, they disagreed on whether the enumeration of federal power would by itself serve to restrain the national government within those powers.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It became clear soon after the Articles of Confederation were implemented that the document had certain flaws that weakened the newly created United States. A new document, the Constitution, was drafted to replace the Articles. Many people supported the Constitution, but some disagreed with it. Both the Federalists and the anti-Federalists provided valuable insight into the creation of the Constitution. Some of the arguments presented by the anti-Federalists were that it lacked a Bill of Rights, which would guarantee citizens freedoms; that the strong central government would be unable to govern such a large territory; and that the government that was established was too close to the British system they had just overcome.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1787-1790 the American Constitution was debated by two opposing political philosophies named the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist were in favor of the newly formed Constitution while the Anti-Federalists objected the new constitution believing that the central government seized too much power by creating a single national government forcing the first Congress to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the Antifederalists felt the Constitution violated. The most significant topic of the debate the participation of the people in voting for ratification of the constitution. Pauline Maier in her article Take This or Nothing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, illustrates reason the constitution was ratified…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anti Federalist Support the Anti Federalists the Federalists will favor the wealthy and they will take away our rights. They will do that because the rich will have more money to campaign. The anti federalist will stop this by making camping easier by making campaign where each person gives a speech in each state. You should also know that that there constitution will take away lots of our rites. They also will not put our rites in the constitution by leaving out the bill of rights .…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Influence Federalists

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalists, named for their call for a confederation of states, supported the Constitution, which increased the power of the federal government. James Madison, the most influential Federalist, wrote the Virginia Plan as a plan for the new government system. According to the Virginia Plan, the number of state representatives in Congress would be proportionate to the state’s population. Another belief of the Federalists was that representatives distanced from their citizens would legislate better because they were detached from their community’s selfishness and could understand what the community really needed. In addition, aristocratic leaders were deemed better because they were highly educated and skilled, unlike the rest of the population…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Factions Forming Prior to the Constitution, our Founding Fathers did not intend for the nation to have any factions. In fact, many saw factions as a danger to the republican government. However, during the ratification process, it became evident that such divisions would rise despite the danger they posed. The earliest faction existed because of differing viewpoints on the ratification of the Constitution.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays