The Role Of Capital Punishment In The Criminal Justice System

Improved Essays
I think that one of the most important aspects of the criminal justice system is the ability to decide whether someone receives the death penalty or not. Capital punishment is the harshest punishment that can be given and in order to reach that verdict the level of scrutiny is extremely high. 73 percent of Americans favor the death penalty, which must make it morally right or, at least, acceptable (Williams, 2012, pg. 223). However, when it comes to ruling in favor of the death penalty the jury gives the verdict. This is a difficult burden for each and every individual who has to sit on the jury because they know they hold someone’s life in their hands. The job of being able to clearly understand comprehend the material and evidence that each side is giving …show more content…
Details in every criminal trial can make or break whether or not someone is guilty or is sentenced to capital punishment. If one is not paying attention they are not only ethically failing their duties but morally as well. Life is the ultimate price and it requires everything from the jury in order to reach the right verdict.

The death penalty possesses several problem one of which is bring your own prejudice into the court hearing. When a juror sits and is listening to the case being presented he or she is supposed to remove all prejudice when thinking about the details. The problem, however, is that most people are not able to separate their prejudice or their personal feelings when deciding on a capital punishment case. There are some people who just as the picture just as the state would present the thought of a murder happening to their loved ones. They make it personal when deciding whether or not the defendant should receive the death penalty. The problem with death penalty cases is it ties into the person’s emotions too much and it can hinder

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nathanson argues that the decision should be made by the majority. He affirms that while some claim that criminals deserve death penalties for their sins, many regard death penalty as a threat to innocent lives instead of the guilty. Because government’s goal of protecting innocent citizens’ lives is more important than executing harmful individuals, governments should go with the majority and stop executions. Nathanson also argues that the cost of death sentences and execution procedures are far more expensive than the benefit of executing criminals. Finally, Nathanson argues that our legal system is not compatible with capital punishment.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has been a topic of contention since it was introduced among humankind. The two sides of this issue are either for or against it. There are many solid points between the two disagreeing parties that need to be explored to make an informed decision on which side you would choose to support. Two essays I will draw from in this writing are written by Edward Koch, who is for, and David Bruck, who is against it. Both parties have made excellent points in their writings and will be great avenues to explore while making your decision.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having individuals that can testify against the false avocation that the death penalty is used to punish those truly guilty for their crimes because it displays the extreme used in the wrong instance through its ruling on the innocent. Capital punishment’s inefficiency shines through the innocents’ conviction because how is providing the wrongful ruling suppose to deter future crime it only works to diminish the public’s trust in the judicial system and the validness of the death penalty ruling. Along with innocent men speaking out against capital punishment, comes the costly and time-consuming misconception that the act of evolving the death penalty has made it more humane even though despite popular belief “the death penalty has not become more civilized with the passage of time” (Stroud III, 381). We an human beings can’t continue to turn a blind eye towards the fact that no matter how the executors of the death penalty make it look it is still the blatant taking of another’s life whether it be with a rope, a chair or lethal doses of drugs. Another reason that both Stroud and myself see as being worth ending the option of capital punishment judicial decision is the appalling conditions that create “an environment conducive to depression and hopelessness” for its inmates (Stroud, 383).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rich Poor Live or Die to kill or not to kill this is the question To sit in a court room quietly observing everyone and everything around you; thinking over and over again about the decision made. This is not only the reality of the person on trial but also that of the juror. In Texas we may be the second largest state in the land (United States) but first in the country when it comes to crime, despite our overwhelming history and support for the death penalty. With each person bringing their own set of ethic and moral code to this debate, the death penalty brings up angst for many. Pick a side, eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth or live and suffer or life is a life.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They represent the defendant. However, the defense attorney plays a very important role in the criminal justice system, with that said, they are also faced with many ethical decisions within their duties. For example, defense attorney’s are often faced with knowing that their client is guilty, however, their job is to defend the justice system, the system of due process, and to ensure that due process is provided to their client. Furthermore, defense attorney’s are often approached by defendants, to compromise their integrity, thereby, undermining the criminal justice system, therefore, jeopardizing their ethics, and the oath to defend the “Bill of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sentencing Instructions

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In North Carolina, which has only the options of life (with parole eligibility in 20 years) or death, over 50% of the jurors interviewed said they would prefer the option of life without possibility of parole to the death penalty (Luginbuhl,1993).2 It should be noted that these results come from jurors who had sat on a capital case and thus were supporters of he death penalty. More attention, therefore, should be paid to how jurors interpret the lack of information about parole eligibility. It would appear that if states had an option of life without parole, a defendant would be less likely to be sentenced to death by a jury motivated by a concern that the defendant would be released onto the streets in the future and continue to be a threat to society. Consequences of a Hung Jury in the Penalty Phase Another area where jurors’ assumptions, unchallenged by instructions from the judge, could lead to arbitrariness concerns jurors’ beliefs about the consequences of their failure to unanimously agree on a penalty. Why should jurors be purposely kept ignorant of information that, on occasion, could determine whether a defendant lives or dies?…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout the course, we have learned how much impact the media have in death penalty cases. Highly publicized cases tend to put a great amount on the prosecutor which could lead to the prosecutor seeking a death sentence to please the public. It will be really hard to develop a system where prosecutors will not be bias and unfair when selecting the jury because at the end of the day the prosecutor seeks for people in the jury that will help him/her get the desired…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the criminal justice system, murder is considered especially heinous (dun DUN). Murder is one of the few charges that carries capital punishment in our legal system. The United States Constitution puts the burden of coming to a verdict on a jury of twelve of your peers. A jury of your peers is not always fair because people often lack a knowledge to fully comprehend a trial, they are often selfish, and people can be indecisive. To embark upon the glorious journey of our legal system, we begin with the knowledge of the people on the jury.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States there are 36 states that have capital punishment with an extraordinary total of two thousand two hundred and ten convictions awaiting execution. However twenty-three out of the thirty-six state have not executed anyone in quarter century. Of the one hundred and seventeen executions, a high number of seventy-two percent executed even ten percent of those sentenced to death. For instance, in the state of Alabama are one hundred and thirty-four murderers serving life terms without ever getting parole, forty-two are sitting on death row.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of this assignment, I was indifferent. I searched through the list of controversial topics, skipping past the ones I was passionate about, to find one that I had no opinion on. I had to choose something I wasn’t biased about because eventually I’d have to choose one and write a counter argument against. This became an opportunity to educate myself on something I had no knowledge of; the death penalty. My family had talked often about Capital Punishment and whether or not it was a suitable form of justice.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is said to be one of the most controversial issue in the United States. Capital punishment is the practice of executing a person as punishment for the crime they have committed. This ethical dilemma has divided Americans into two halves: those “for” capital punishment and those “against” capital punishment. The individuals that are for capital punishment believe that the act is justice and should remain legal. On the other hand, the individuals that are against capital punishment believe that capital punishment is an unethical act and should be illegal.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack Porter UNESCAP Role of Capital Punishment in Modern Society United Kingdom Oceanside High School The four most prominent practitioners of capital punishment include Iran, China, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq, many of which are located in the Asia-pacific region. Additionally, most countries in the Asia-Pacific region create false statistics in regards to their use of the death penalty. The processes of a fair trial for an individual are often overlooked due to the amount of money and time spent on such a task. Under Article 14 of the ICCPR (International Convention for Civil and Political Rights), the right to a fair trial is mandatory throughout all nations that have signed onto the organisation, however many nations of course, that have accepted…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays