The Role Of Autonomy In Healthcare

Improved Essays
An individual’s principle of autonomy with regards to healthcare reiterates and serves as a reminder to us that every person has the aptitude and the right to make his or her own decisions based on their personal values, beliefs, background and standards. Autonomy is frequently defined in a number of ways, however, the common theme on these definitions refer to persons having the capacity to reason and make their own decisions (Elliott, 2001). In my opinion, the principle of autonomy does not automatically empower a person to do something that is harmful to oneself and just as important, to others. However, in cases of end-of-life care which we’ll consider as the harmful action, do we grant this individual his right of self-determination if

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Another key aspect of professionalism I am going to discuss is medical ethics, Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles of biomedical ethics is the commonly used framework when discussing medical ethics. The four principles include, Respect for Autonomy, beneficence, non -maleficence and Justice. ((Beauchamp and Childress, 2001) According to Saint Joseph’s university, autonomy refers to the right of a patient to retain control over his or her body. (Joseph, 2017).…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt, each of these men agree that competent patients have this privilege; however, they do not agree on when the patient has the right to use this privilege. Cowart’s argument favors healthcare professionals allowing patients to use their free will at any given moment regardless of the positive or negative outcomes of his or her decision. I agree with Cowart’s argument pertaining to the rights of patients. Cowart discusses how patient autonomy…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A person’s autonomy is a privilege that is earned through the knowledge gained through life experiences. For children, the right to decide is withdrawn because the parent’s are thought to know what is best in the circumstances concerning their children. The ability to understand and comprehend the severity of illness or the consequences of decisions is lacking in adolescents. They are deemed incapable of making informed decisions thus incompetent; therefore, the parents are given the authority to provide or deny consent on behalf of their children. Similarly, elderly who are experiencing deteriorating illnesses may have an altered competence due to being in denial or having fear of the outcome.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The phrases active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide raise many concerns in today's society. When speaking of euthanasia and suicide, the term autonomy quickly comes into question. Autonomy is the right of having self-determination, self-control, or independence. Many factors arise in certain circumstances when determining if active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is morally acceptable. Daniel Callahan and John Lachs both have opinions on the role that autonomy participates in active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Brock mentions that “A central aspect of human dignity lies in people's capacity to direct their lives”. The concept of “individual self-determination” is thus strongly linked to dignity. This former principle makes that given the plurality of patients’ cases, they should all be granted the right to choose for their death. Also, for Brock the individual is the only one who can decide whether his/her life is still a benefit or a “burden”. To support his defense of active euthanasia and assisted suicide, Brock takes a consequentialist approach and argues that there is no morally significant difference between a patient choosing to forego “life-sustaining treatment”, meaning the patient voluntary chooses for passive euthanasia, and active euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A conflict between a physician and patient on the course of treatment is a common topic that arises in bioethical conversation. This case explores the topic of paternalistic choices dealing with patient autonomy and when it is ethically reasonable for a physician to intervene and decide as to whether an individual is competent to make decisions about their own care. The patient in the case, Mr. Howe was asked to make a lifesaving medical decision while in duress and not fully understanding the procedure and the potential outcome if he refused. In this case I believe the physician made the correct decision to intubate Mr. Howe against his explicit instructions not to. The physician made a determination that the patient was not accurately expressing his wishes as if he was of sound mind.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Outline for Arguments on PAS and Euthanasia When addressing the matter of Euthanasia and PAS, “we must first acknowledge that figuring out the benefits and harms of permitting euthanasia or PAS is speculative at best” (Emanuel). As well, it is important to acknowledge the fact that, “no matter which social policy regarding euthanasia or PAS is adopted - legalization or maintaining the current policy of permitting them in individual cases - there will be both benefits and harms” (Emanuel). In this argument, it will be shown that legalizing Euthanasia and PAS within the United States, will help people, by allowing terminally ill patients to realize the end of a good death or, more accurately, a create a higher quality dying experience for them.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Opponents say that difficult decisions are supposed to be made, by one’s self, family, and a physician, about a life that is at an end and should be allowed to be let go. It is not for the government to decide when the plug should be pulled or for a death pill to be administered. While opponents argue medically assisted suicide is unethical and will lead society down a slippery slope, proponents argue that it is ethically permissible, and is “the ultimate civil right” and not to let mentally competent, terminally ill patients who want to end their pain and suffering in a peaceful manner, is disrespectful to their right to personal autonomy. But the more modern day medicine and technology continue to pull people from the brink of death, more and more people will be asking for the right to end their lives, because extending the length of life, allows time for more people to become terminally ill and be in pain. Virtually all people want their loved ones to remember them as they once were, not what they could become in the years following the diagnosis of a terminally illness.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Autonomy and Ethical Principles of Care Gunnar Kupfer Grand Canyon University HLT-305 October 16th 2016 Ethics in health care could be life or death. Patients have a lot of rights when it comes to health care, yet patients don’t even know what they are. Basic consent forms truly don’t adequately inform patients of their rights. Consent forms are written in high levels and use words most wont understand. The average person simply cannot read a Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy consent form.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many advocators of a PAS policy claim that allowing physician assisted suicide to those who met certain requirements (i.e. the patient is at the end of her life, the patient is suffering uncontrollably, the patient requests aid in dying, etc.), would be promoting the patient’s autonomy and an act of beneficence. If we could not guarantee Velleman’s assumptions, how awful would a PAS policy be? One objection to Velleman’s argument is that these assumptions are not always true. Loved ones may pressure some patients to choose a certain option due to emotional or financial strain on others. This could escalate to abuse of a PAS policy, where a patient feels obligated to choose PAS, even if she would like to live, because others pressure her; thus undermining their authority.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical principles are not laws, but guiding principles about what is good and what is bad, that should direct doctors and other health care professionals in their work and decision making. Issues arising over end-of-life care involving decisions that affect the nature and timing of an individual's death raise difficult ethical conflicts for all concerned and can be a source of discord between health professionals within a team, health professionals and family members, or between different family members. Ethical dilemmas arise when there is a perceived conflicting duty to the patient, such as a conflict between a duty to preserve life and a duty to act in a patient's best interests, or when an ethical principle such as respect for autonomy conflicts with a duty not to…

    • 3174 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    11). For some terminally ill patients, the desire to retain a certain quality of life, avoid potential suffering, protect their dignity, and be remembered in a certain way outweighs any desire to continue living. VAE would allow these patients make personal decisions about how they die and when they die, upholding the value of self-determination. The lack of an objective threshold for when a life is no longer worth living makes self-determination even more important in these cases. The value of well-being supports a patient’s ability to determine when death is preferable to continued existence.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Other factors include the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process and opposition to prolonging life by using sophisticated medical technology when it is recognized that care is futile. Closely related to self-determination is the principle of autonomy. This principle states that persons should have the right to make their own decisions about the course of their own lives whenever they can. By extension, they should also have the right to determine the course of their own dying as much as possible. The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public policies that prohibit euthanasia violate the principle of moral autonomy of individuals because as long as an individual has a…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays