The Robert Levy Case

Decent Essays
Robert Levy was a very brilliant and ambitious man that did well for himself in his early years; from earning his PhD in business to starting his own financial information and software firm called CDA Investment Technologies, where he later sold it for millions of dollars. He later decided to attend George Mason University law school at the age of forty-nine due to the fact they accepted libertarian scholar. He graduated and landed a law position with Royce Lamberth, at the federal district court in Washington and later on at the D.C. Circuit for Douglas Ginsburg. Apparently, Levy was older than the judges he worked for as a law clerk.
Levy incorporate the same business ethics to law. He had key interest in the Second Amendment that confer an individual to bear arms which at that time got a lot of attention even though he was not a owner of a gun. Although the federal government was going to advocate the individual rights in all legal action,
…show more content…
Levy agreed to fund the case by himself when Clark Neily III and Simpson asked him. Along with Clark Neily III and Steve Simpson, Levy hired Alan Gura a lawyer from Virginia who had an aggressive approach with no experience with the Supreme Court nor the constitutional litigation to served with him and the other individuals on the Courts. However, when the National Rifle Association heard that Levy and his team were zooming in on their turf they were not too please. Neily was approach by his old professor Nelson Lund from George Mason and Charles a former Rea-gan-era Justice Department official with close ties to the conservatives movement to talk him out of funding the the case. He was told that a bad ruling could set back the case for years and Rehnquist and O’Connor would never buy a revision of the Second

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The beginning When South Carolina seceded from the Union on December 20, 1860, United States Maj. Robert Anderson and his force of 85 soldiers were positioned at Fort Moultrie near the mouth of Charleston Harbor. On December 26, fearing for the safety of his men, Anderson moved his command to Fort Sumter, an imposing fortification in the middle of the harbor. While politicians and military commanders wrote and screamed about the legality and appropriateness of this provocative move, Anderson’s position became perilous. Just after the inauguration of President Abraham Lincoln on March 4, 1861, Anderson reported that he had only a six week supply of food left in the fort and Confederate patience for a foreign force in its territory was wearing…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levine v. Mcgrath 1. Against For She could stay with her sister It is what Sarah wanted She could see her school friends and grow up in the same neighbourhood she had before 2. Separating the sisters was not the main concern in this case as Sarah wanted to move herself, and they would still be able to see each other on alternating weekends if they wished to.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gideon v. Wainwright,372 U.S. 335 (1963) Parties: Plaintiff: State of Florida (the prosecutor) Defendant: Gideon Petitioner to the Florida Supreme Court: Gideon (on a writ of habeas corpus) Respondent to the Florida Supreme Court: State of Florida Petitioner to the United States Supreme Court: Gideon (on a writ of certiorari) Respondent to the United States Supreme Court: State of Florida History: Gideon was charged with a misdemeanor (B & E).…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court case, “District of Columbia vs. Heller” was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia for supposedly, infringing upon the rights protected by the second amendment. The suit was filed by Dick Heller, a police officer in Washington, DC. In an attempt to lower the crime rates, DC placed a ban on all handguns. The chief of police was allowed to give licenses to own handguns for a year, but denied most applicants. After heller and several others were denied, they brought the issue up to the local district court, which ruled in favor of the ban.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Clarence Gideon's Trial

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Clarence Gideon had a trial for breaking and entering and he was convicted guilty for stealing beer, wine, and Coca cola . He was sent to jail and he wrote a letter to the Supreme Court after two years explaining what had happened. The Supreme Court looked over it and gave Gideon a second trial except this time he had a lawyer to represent him. instead of himself. He went to the trial and his lawyer called multiple witnesses to the stand and he explained how Lester Wade was there and saw through the high windows and was standing guard for his friends.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another thing that he did was attend the continental congress which was a huge stepping stone in American history and if that had not happened the British would probably be ruling the world for the declaration of independence was a thing that had to be done by a large group of people and in America there was no way to talk to some on without being in front of them so they had to meet as a big group. If the declaration of independence was not made and signed there would be no free America and just British so we would all be under the kings / queens rule and there would probably be another chance to declare independence but it would come at a much higher cost and there would be war. There might even be more slavery because there would not be a deceleration of independence to "justify" the freedom of slaves. “Without morals a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure (and) which insures to the good eternal happiness, are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How is it possible that a poor, uneducated man was able to change the law of the United States? As Clarence Earl Gideon was put on trial for breaking and entering, he remained adamant and relentless in his right to due process; more importantly, his right to a lawyer. After being forced to represent himself, Gideon pled not guilty, fought his way through the trial, and was still convicted. Gideon’s resilience would not let this be the end of his battle. He journeyed his way to the Supreme Court and stood up for what he felt was right.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Gideon's Trumpet

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gideon’s Trumpet In 1961, a case appeared to the United States Supreme Court that challenged a well-accepted precedent established by the court almost 20 years prior. The case being discussed in this book is Gideon vs Wainwright, in which the defendant is a fifty-one-year-old white man in Florida. Gideon was accused of petty larceny, and eventually found guilty in court. Gideon, though, was representing himself, as he could not afford an attorney and was never provided with one.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the Supreme Court rulings such as in the Dred Scott case, the North and South fought numerous times over slavery. The North feared the many potential consequences of this case. The South was reluctant to give up slavery for various reasons. The Dred Scott v. Sandford case set precedent for other cases with similar conflicts. This case also provided reasons for the Civil War to occur between the North and South.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He thought Samuel Swartwout should be given the opportunity to be a money collector at the port. He also thought that the Native Americans should get their land. He didn’t want only the rich or only the white to have opportunities. He wanted everyone to have the…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    DRED SCOTT V. SANFORD: THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS Jay Barber 25938654 HIUS-221 November 16, 2017 As seminal decision rendered by the United States Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sanford brought the issues of racism and slavery to the forefront of American political culture during the nineteenth century. It has also been considered by legal and political scholars to be a “ghastly error”, the “product of an overly ideological and reactionary judge”, and a cause of the Civil War. Many abolitionists and Northerners declared the Supreme Court’s decision to be illegitimate while others demanded obedience to the Court’s decision and labeled disobedience as rebellion, treason, and unconstitutional.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    District of Columbia v. Heller The Second Amendment is one of the most controversial amendments in the Constitution. There have been several cases where the Amendment has been challenged. As the world keeps growing and developing, the amendments have stayed the same since the creation in 1789. Therefore, as the years go by the original meaning of the text is getting lost in translation, which has caused the Supreme Court Justices to try to interpret the meaning the best way they can to ensure a fair trial.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The District of Columbia passed the 1975 Firearms Control Regulations Act. This act made it illegal to own handguns, automatic firearms, or high capacity rifles and prohibited the possession of unregistered firearms. Dick Heller, a special police officer in the District of Columbia, carried a firearm as part of his job. He was granted access into federal buildings with the gun, but the new provision made it illegal to possess in his own home. Along with Dick Heller, five other D.C. residents tried to seek resolution to not being able to have a handgun and challenge the constitutionality of this problem.…

    • 3137 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays