The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Fusion

Improved Essays
The search for a form of power that is almost completely renewable and its energy output far exceeds the energy required to start and maintain the reaction has been a focus for many years. Energies that are present today that involve burning things to produce electricity, such as coal, produce tons of pollution at a worldwide level. One of the newest energy sources being researched is a nuclear fusion reactor. This type of power generation has the ability to satisfy this search for a sustainable energy source with very little negative effects. The goal is within reach with only the cost of the process preventing it from reaching the average energy consumer.
Fusion is the process in which the union of atomic nuclei form heavier nuclei resulting
…show more content…
It is said that if there was to be a fire in the plant that produced the Tritium there would be no need to evacuate the neighboring population as the health risks would be so minimal.
The waste products, like Tritium, that are produced from the fusion process are not high activity/long life radioactive waste which means they can be disposed of safely and not impact either people or the environment. The main product used in the fusion process is Helium, which is inert, and can do little to no damage to the environment. In the part of the building housing the fusion process the main component that could be radioactive would be the reactor itself (CCFE, n.d.). And the reactor components would be safe to reuse or dispose of in 100 years (CCFE, n.d.).
In addition to having little radioactive waste to worry about, the fusion process is designed to be safe for the environment when operating. Reactor meltdowns like were seen at Chernobyl are close to impossible at a fusion reactor station. When the fusion reaction takes place there is almost no chance of the reactor melting down due to the small amounts of fuel that are in the reactor at any time. In fact, it takes less than 4 grams to start the fusion
…show more content…
So rather than a complicated series of steps to shut down a reactor, the process as designed, once interrupted, acts as an immediate off switch.
Finally, if the cooling mechanism was to fail, the barriers would not reach the melting point of the materials and thus would not be affected. Another one of the big issues affecting the design and implementation of functioning commercial fusion plants is the need for these ultra-high temperature materials that are able to withstand the normal heat given off by the fusion process and thus would withstand any melting point that would be possible from a fusion reaction or cooling malfunction.
Fusion energy may take a great deal of energy to get the reaction started but once started it will be able to produce much more energy than was put into it. Unfortunately, the energy required to start the whole process is in an experimental stage and is currently higher than the energy being produced. Overall, fusion is not yet close to become a commercially viable energy source as the construction and manufacturing of the required parts is a billion dollar project. But the future is near as the many test sites around the world are showing great steps towards it being a cost effective and clean solution in the near future. All that fusion needs is the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Fusion reaction is a reaction where light cores of hydrogen isotopes (deuterium and tritium) at high-speed collide with each other to form a heavier helium nucleus and a free neutron, which releases enormous amount of energy. Fusion reactor requires only about 30 grams of hydrogen isotopes (deuterium and tritium). At any time in the vacuum chamber there is less than one gram of fuel. We have deuterium in unlimited quantities in seawater, and tritium is produced from lithium, a lack of which we also do not have.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concepts of nuclear fusion and fission have recently taken a great role on the future of energy acquirement. Nuclear energy seemingly is the way of the future as it is exceedingly more efficient than any means of energy that which we have now. In nuclear power plants, fission is used to generate the power required to develop steam which then powers turbines. Fusion on the other hand, is essentially the reaction that occurs in the sun. Essentially, "Hydrogen nuclei (such as deuterium and tritium – basically, hydrogen with extra neutrons) fuse to form helium, and the mass defect is released as energy."…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the term Nuclear Power or Nuclear Energy is used usually the first thing that comes to mind for most people are war, bombs, deformed humans, and destruction. In fact, these are four things that least occur in the nuclear field. Yes, war, bombs, and what not are used, but also most of all the nuclear energy used in today’s society comes in the form of production of electricity. Therefore, we do get something good out of it.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This form of energy is clean and uses water as its fuel to produce. (four) As well (transition) Nuclear Fission Energy is known for not contributing to global warming and no air pollution. This form of energy has a huge role in astronomy. The hydrogen fuel need is readily available for any form of homing structures. Although nuclear fission isn’t a renewable resources, it can produce a large vanity of energy for a low amount of fuel.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During a thorium-powered nuclear reaction, most of the thorium is consumed, which leads to less waste, most of which is declared non-hazardous in 30 years. The most dangerous nuclear waste material currently in use must be stored for 10,000 years. Furthermore, 1 metric ton of thorium is equal to 250 metric tons in terms of efficiency in a water…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 1900 and 2000 the world population increased from 1.5 to 6.1 billion people (Max Roser) and by the end of 2100 the population is expected at 11 billion people, this rapid acceleration means large scale environmentally friendly energy is needed sooner rather than later (The Guardian). Fusion energy will be a future energy source, with the ITER machine under construction based on the ‘Tokamak’ concept of magnetic confinement. ITER is predicted to start operating in 2019, with electricity generation to follow thirty-forty years later (ITER). In a fusion reaction, energy is released when two light atomic nuclei are fused together to form one heavier atom.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the atomic bomb was dropped nuclear physicists began looking into other uses for nuclear power. A decade later scientist were able to productively generate nuclear power into an alternative source for electricity. Nuclear reactor generate 17 percent of the electricity around the world reaching a remarkable high compared to previous years (Martin). Plants can generate more than a gigawatt of electricity which is about one million megawatts of energy. That’s why using nuclear power for electricity is beneficial.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Chernobyl Explosion 1986

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is about 200 tonnes which is 2,205 lbs. of highly radioactive material that remains within it and this poses an environmental hazard until it is contained (Association, 2016). A new safe confinement structure is due to be completed in 2017. It is in an arch form that is 110 meters high and 165 meters long. It will cover both the unit 4 reactor and the confinement structure that was built in 1986 (Association, 2016).…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fusion Pros And Cons

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A science born from the hearts of the hottest starts, fusion sets its eyes on energy domination in the twenty-first century. Unfortunately, fusion research is severely underfunded and is met by criticism from many, arguing that it is unviable or even impossible and that the payoff isn’t worth the initial cost. Although they may argue this they ignore the fact that fusion is extremely efficient, could solve environmental woes, and that fusion produces massive amounts of energy from readily available fuel sources. First I deem it important to immediately shoot down some of the criticism that people have of fusion.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With a nuclear reactor you get a lot of power without using a lot of…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anne McKenny Karen Peebles English, ENG-111 4258N November 29, 2014 The Disastrous Effects of Chernobyl Though there are many different sources of energy in the world, including petroleum and coal, one of the most dangerous is nuclear energy, which harnesses the power of the atom. Though nuclear power does not emit as many harmful chemicals as coal does, it has the potential to make large areas of land inhospitable for hundreds of years, depending on the time of element used in the core. There are several different ways of harnessing nuclear energy, and different countries tend to lean towards different types of reactors, as one article explains, “[i]n the United States, two-thirds of the reactors are pressurized water reactors (PWR) and the…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Nuclear fission and Nuclear fusion reactions have their advantages and disadvantages. In terms of energy that they produce fusion reactions produces relatively more energy compared to fission reactions however fusion reactions require more conditions for them to take place. They require higher temperatures which means that the energy that has to be inputted for them to work is way more compared to the energy inputted for the fission reactions because of this fact it might not be wise to input more energy when we are trying to find ways to get energy without using too much in the process of acquiring it. The conditions that fusion requires means that it is quite highly cost wise to get fusion working compared to fission reactions because they do not require the same type of containment fusion requires. Both do produce radioactive substances however fusion…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This contrasts to coal fired units which emit copious amounts of substances that aren’t immediately deadly, and didn’t require immediate attention when they were first created thus leading to the environmental state we’re currently in. even though it’s true that nuclear fallout can be a serious problem, many reactors have several containment precautions. Even the incident at Three Mile Island which scared a nation into halting production of nuclear energy was mostly contained, and there have been no identifiable negative health effects [9]. Even considering the amount of current deaths because of both nuclear and fossil fuels, studies show that the amount of energy being produced by nuclear power instead of fossil fuels has actually saved tens of thousands of lives. The study estimated that for each terawatt hour of electricity produced, an average of 26.67 lives are lost whereas a terawatt hour of nuclear electricity kills an average of 0.074 people (stats relevant for Europe)…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction: With the constant rise for global energy, there is a huge demand for environmentally clean and cheap energy sources. Now, for many years power generated by nuclear power plants has been a reliable source for energy but the current amount of uranium, which is the fuel will satisfy the energy requirements for the next 200 years. Also, the nuclear reactors are not very efficient as not all of the uranium mined is being used to generate power. In this essay, I will discuss an alternate method of producing nuclear energy, its impact on the environment and the benefits and disadvantages that come with this new method. There are 2 known types of nuclear reactions, one of them is nuclear fusion which can provide an inexhaustible source…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear energy is produced by nuclear fusion which consists of splitting an atom in two, which creates a mass that then turns into a large sum of energy. The reaction is controlled and the energy is harnessed. In the United States alone, there are around 61 nuclear power plants, and in total they produce 20% of our electricity. There have been numerous of points about nuclear energy that have been weighed and discussed over the years. Whether or not nuclear power plants are indeed safe, the costs that go into building these plants, or how renewable the resources to maintaining such a high amount of energy are.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays