The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…
Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…
Nick Anyaegbunam March 9th, 2018 Congress, Bureau, and Public Policy March 8th, 2018 Unfortunately, one of the most heated debates that have encapsulated our political discussion is gun control. Since Sandy Hook in November 2012, there have been over 1600 mass shootings within the United States, which claimed about 1,800 casualties and over 4600 wounded. The United States is the only country in which mass shootings occur frequently. In order to combat this epidemic and enhance our lax gun control policy, I would like to explain how Representative David Cicilline’s legislation on gun control could quite possibly navigate its way through our intricate legislative process and possible roadblocks for this bill on its arduous journey to becoming a law.…
Did the framers of the Constitution intend for every U.S. citizen to have the right to bear arms? It is scary to think about what would happen if everyone in a mall had a gun. Under the Second Amendment, American citizens have the right to bear arms and that right should never be violated. Although that is true, gun control is needed because thousands of US citizens are killed every year from the misuse of weapons.…
Perhaps one of the most debated topics in the United States is the issue of gun control. Heated debates arguing both for and against stricter gun control policies have raged for decades and have been hot button issues for many politicians during campaign speeches. Supporters of strict gun control laws believe this is the best way to protect citizens; however this logic fails to recognize a crucial point. Enacting and enforcing strict gun laws restricts access to guns only for law abiding citizens who will follow the legal process of obtaining a gun. Gun laws do very little to reduce the amount of illegal firearms nor will it reduce the amount of crime that takes place with a firearm.…
The sad truth is that some people would abuse and take advantage of the right to own a weapon. The Supreme Court ruling in the District of Colombia v. Heller case says that the Second Amendment, “… is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act says that it is unlawful to sell a weapon to anyone with the following conditions: under indictment or has been convicted for any crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, a fugitive from justice, an unlawful user or addict of marijuana or any depressant or stimulant drug, and has been declared mentally ill or been committed to any mental institution. These regulations keep guns out of the hands of those who cannot be…
There is always something on the news about violence, whether it is school shootings or work place violence, so are gun control laws the answer? No, gun control laws do not reduce crimes committed with firearms, and in fact are counterproductive by increasing the violent crime rates, as well as unconstitutional. Gun control laws do not reduce crimes committed with fire arms. A perfect example of this is this is in Massachusetts in 1998, some of the toughest gun laws in the country were passed. Since 1998, gun crime in Massachusetts has gotten worse, not better.…
Over the past years, there have been many debates over guns and the protection the Second Amendment gives to firearms. As with all debates, there are sides to them. Gun control activist are people who wish to have legislation passed that is intended to lower violence related to firearms as well as limit a civilians opportunity to possess a firearm. On the other side of the spectrum are the gun rights activist who seek argue that by passing legislation on gun control, it is infringing on the rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Signed in on December 15, 1791, the Second Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms as one of ten amendments that would make up the Bill of Rights.…
Colleen Hanabusa says, “I am certain that there are extremists on both sides of the gun control debate in Hawaii, as in the rest of the nation. However, it has been willingness and ability to develop mutually respectful and effective gun control laws that have kept our community safe.” There is a very high level of disagreement about the need for new gun control laws. It is evident that reaching a “mutually respectful and effective” dialogue will be challenging. Tougher gun control laws are necessary because these laws, once enforced, will make it harder for criminals and mentally unstable people to get weapons.…
Introduction In general, gun control is a term that denotes the policies and laws introduced for the manufacture, production, trade, transfer, ownership, alteration, or utilization of firearms. These laws and policies are significantly different in every country. As far as the United States of America is concerned, the gun laws in the country administer the regulation of trading, employing, and possessing of assault weapons. It needs to be noted that there is a remarkable variation in state laws pertaining gun control with either a restricted or broader extent when compared with the federal laws.…
Gun control is a huge ordeal in our society right now. There are alot of problems and ideas about it, and people are dying to the cause of others having guns. Is it because we are giving guns out too willingly and the wrong people are getting them? Or are guns just something that we cant trust giving out to civilians. Some people say gun control should happen, other say it shouldnt.…
(Hendrickson, 2013) This action shows that Americans will trust guns enough to protect their families’ even if they do not really know how to use a gun. Americans understand that law enforcement really can’t prevent most incidents involving an intruder in a family home so they must do everything they can to protect themselves. They also feel that they should buy as much ammunition as they can before any gun policies are created which will result in their rights being infringed. (Hendrickson, 2013)…
Gun Control Laws and the Foreseen Outcomes in the United States The gun law regulation in the United States is a long-standing debate in which policymakers are trying to make it harder for people to obtain a weapon and the ammunition. The recent protests and an increasing number of death cases caused by the misuse of guns to kill themselves or harming other like the recent cases regarding the mass shooting in Florida which left seventeen people dead and the sandy hook elementary shooting which left twenty-six people dead (Shermer). These events have led Congress to create stricter laws as the current laws have a flaw which people can exploit. The standing of this issue has divided people in terms of whether citizens should be allowed to have…
The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…
Lately, it seems that every time you turn on the television, there is an incidence of gun violence in the news. School shootings, domestic violences, and other forms of firearm brutality make up most of the content displayed in the media, calling for a possible increase in gun control in the United States. This controversial subject has become a common topic of debate all over the country: should civilian-use of violent firearms be limited or prohibited, or should the decision to possess these guns be up to the individual person? There are many arguments supporting and opposing the government 's right to restrict the rights that the Constitution imposes. Some argue that taking weapons away from the people is a violation of the Second Amendment, while others argue that guns have changed too much over time for the allowances of the…