The Posse Comitatus Act (PCA)

Improved Essays
The Posse Comitatus Act:
“Whoever, except in cases and under such circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or by an Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army as a posse Comitatus or otherwise to execute laws shall be fined no more that $10,000 or be imprisoned not more than two years, or both” (18 U.S. Code § 1385, 1878).

The American people have always had a tradition that abhors the involvement of the military in the affairs of the civilians unless it is necessary. This tradition has been stressed in the nineteenth century Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) forbidding the Army and the Air Force from executing civil law unless authorized by the appropriate authorities. This PCA consist of 52 words, but is one of the most
…show more content…
Striking the desired balance between when the rule is to be applied and when to have an exception has always been difficult. Failing to achieve this balance has also proven unfortunate. Elsea and Doyle (2012) explain that if the rule of law appears to be unforgiving, then the Shay's Rebellion can be unchecked. The authors continue by explaining that if exceptions are also granted generously, then a Kent State or a Boston Massacre can …show more content…
The Commerce clause permits Congress to “regulate and protect the instrumentalities, persons, or things in interstate commerce” (Abbot & Hetzel, 2010). Therefore when there is a severe enough economic impact during catastrophic emergencies Congress can deploy federal troops to the area in order to restore interstate commerce (Abbot & Hetzel, 2010).
The Necessary and Proper clause provides Congress the power “to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof” (U.S. Cont. art. I § 8 paragraph 18). This article is very important in Congress being able to exercise its Commerce, Insurrection, and Guarantee clauses (Abbot & Hetzel, 2010).
Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution states that “Congress shall have the Power to lay and collect taxes, Duties, Imposts Exercises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defense and general Welfare of the United States. This is often interpreted as the Spending clause. This clause does not provide direct authority for the deployment of federal troops for law enforcement purposes, however, it does give Congress authority to assert federal control during catastrophic events by requiring states to meet certain requirements in order to obtain

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Questions from Problem One: Does Virginia have a militia? Yes, Virginia does have a militia. The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration’s official website details the establishment of a militia in Article 1 Section 13 of Virginia’s Bill of Rights, located within the Virginia Constitution: That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. More importantly, Liberty University Law Review’s Stephen P. Halbrook points out that in the year 1971, the people of Virginia revised their Constitution…

    • 2225 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Specifically, the texts states, “...President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated”. Hence, this aids that the President cannot send out the United States Armed Forces into war without advising and acknowledging Congress first. Subsequently, the text discloses, “...President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces unless Congress has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization”. This quote from the text suggest that, the President can’t stop the use of United States Armed Forces unless Congress has declared War or has made a law giving permission to use the United States Armed Forces.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice Decision Paper In this case petitioner, Fred Korematsu, is being charged by the federal district court for breaking Civilian Exclusion order No. 34 and for being found outside of the prescribed area during curfew. The first and main charge towards Korematsu is that he has remained at the military zone which is a direct violation of the Civilian Exclusion Order No.34 (Mr. Justice Black, Opinion of the Court). The second charge promoted against Korematsu is for deliberate breaking of the curfew order. This decision paper supports the idea of discharging the petitioner because of unconstitutionality of the Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34, racial based discrimination in curfew order, and an overall racial discrimination of the people of…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Article 1 section 8, it talks about how Congress can do anything to carry out its’ duties (Barbour, 2013). They oversee the executive and judicial branch. Their job is not just to try to do what is best for their state, but as well as what is best for their country. Because of this, they are the only branch that can vote on legislation or introduce bills. The most important…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bonus Army marched the streets and caused chaos for everyone. They were belligerent and had to be forcefully removed from private property. There has been a lot of evidence brought to this court today, though the only evidence that has no inconsistencies is the evidence to defend president Hoover. President Hoover did not violate any of the Bonus Army’s first amendment rights because they forfeited falling under the amendment’s protection when they were no longer protesting peacefully. Also, President Hoover was not responsible for the destruction of the camps because he did not send an order to enter the camps, he actually sent the exact opposite order, but it was General MacArthur who refused to obey those orders.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles Congress had the power “to declare war and make peace, to make treaties and alliances, to coin or borrow money, and to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States there is many cases of civil unjust and/or acts that are morally just. This is due mostly in part because of the constitution of the United States and how it is interpreted. There are mainly two ways of interpreting the constitution; strict and loose construction. Strict and loose construction of the constitution can apply to practically every national debacle.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Federalist #51, “In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates,” meaning congress is the most powerful branch of the government, but the founding fathers believed the president should serve as an additional check on power. A perfect example of why they wanted the check on congress’s power is what Madison stated in federalist #51, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” This means that if congress becomes too powerful then the president can check congressional power and vice versa. The president can convene congress and has veto power. The president can call Congress into a special session, as described by the constitution, on “extraordinary occasions.”…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Situations such as the violations to a person’s amendment lead people to believe if the amendment really is at work. An example is when a man accused prison of violating his 13th Amendment. McGarry, in the $11 million lawsuit, claims he was forced to work…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: In Article I of The U.S. Constitution, the powers and responsibilities of the U.S. Congress are outlined. In an essay format answer, you are to discuss the following. First, discuss the enumerated and implied powers of Congress.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tenth Amendment guarantees that all forces not appointed to the national government are held to the states or to the general population. The Supreme Court has tried to secure this alteration lately by limiting Congress' energy. For instance, when looking to restrain the force of states, Congress must give an unambiguous explanation of its expectation to overrule state expert. the Tenth Amendment was proposed to affirm the comprehension of the general population at the time the Constitution was embraced, that forces not allowed to the United States were saved to the States or to the general population. It added nothing to the instrument as initially sanctioned.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Welfare Testing

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. (Vol. 15, Is. 5, pp. 1539-1559) Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6b36aece-4bd5-4961-b371-ca7f92032795%40sessionmgr110&vid=2&hid=125 Martin, D. (2012, March 18).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever been afraid of getting your second amendment taken away from you? What about the government telling you what kind of guns you can and cannot have. Your second amendment could be taken away and is even treated in many places that you go around the U.S which could scare a lot of people. In this paper we will be talking about news articles involving the second amendment,a servea given, lastly court cases involving the second amendment. Have you looked at the news lightly and how the second amendment is being treated in schools and all over in the news.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some things that Congress has the power to do are: Collect taxes, print and borrow money, declare war, set up federal courts, propose amendments to the Constitution, control commerce, and accept or reject foreign treaties. Congress also has the power to do a pocket veto, which means that if they send a bill to the President he either has 10 days to return it to them vetoed or it is as if it were signed. If the President does send a bill back that has been vetoed, Congress has the power to override the veto with a 2/3 vote. Congress however cannot: Pass ex post facto law, Pass bill of attainder, grant titles of nobility, or suspend writ of habeas corpus which protects citizens from illegal…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Why does Jackson believe that even though military authorities have the power to violate constitutional protections in time of war, the courts should not approve their actions? Justice Jackson believes that even though military authorities have the power to violate constitutional protections in time of war, the courts should not approve their actions because the orders could very well be unconstitutional and are not legitimate legislative laws. Jackson argues that it is a military program that is being carried out and states "… He [General DeWitt] issues orders, and they may have a certain authority as military commands, although they may be very bad a constitutional law" (Foner 208).…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays