Political Philosophies Of Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

Improved Essays
In the 17th century, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were philosophers who developed beliefs about the nature of man, which influenced their political philosophies and ideas about the social contract between the people and their government. Thomas Hobbes believed that all humans were naturally wicked and selfish. He stated that without a government there would be war with every man against each other and life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. Meanwhile, John Locke believed that all humans were naturally good and could learn from their experiences and improve themselves. He thought as reasonable human beings, humans had the natural ability to govern their own affairs and to look after themselves. In my view, John Locke´s philosophy …show more content…
Back then he believed that all humans are born with their natural rights; life, liberty, and property. He had the idea of a direct democracy for his people. The government’s purpose was to protect the rights of people and for it’s power to come from the consent of the people. In the United States democracy: Citizens elect representatives to national, state, and local government which create the laws that govern U.S society. The U.S government is split into three branches legislative, judicial, and executive in order to prevent one branch from gaining too much power. Unlike Thomas Hobbes, who believed human beings should pursue their own self-interest relentlessly. Therefore the type of government, he advocated was an absolute monarchy. This type of government supported that there should be a supreme power of some kind in society, without stating definitively which sort of sovereign power is …show more content…
For instance, in source #3 “Why Your Worst Deeds Don't Define You” it's based off a young man (19 years old) who went to jail for killing someone. Before this, growing up he was an honor roll/scholarship student and had the dream to become a doctor, but due to a tragic event in life. His parents ended up having a divorce, which impacted his decisions and thoughts on life. He wasn't in the right state of mind. Later on in his journey he gained redemption due to viewing his true values/aspects in life. This is why even though people don't always make the right decisions, it doesn't justify what kind of person they truly are. According to Locke in his beliefs he had stated that people had the ability to learn from their experiences and improve

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    John Locke was very different from another great philosopher named Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes believed that the individual was completely helpless and corrupt. He believed that a monarchy was the best form of government. He came up with this because he traveled around the world learning about forms of government to help England’s. John locke, on the other hand, believed only that the whole was better than the self.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believed that people needed to be governed because without government the nation would be…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leah Schulz Professor Jennifer Hanson History 2- 81010 September 07, 2017 Hobbes vs. Locke Both, Hobbes and Locke, were known as social contract theorists as well as natural law theorists. Hobbes is well known for writing Leviathan and Locke is well known for writing Treatises on Government. However, they are different in regards to their stand and conclusions in several laws of nature. Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher from Malmesbury. He first started rising to fame when his book Leviathan, laid the foundation of Western political philosophy.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is known that the American Constitution was inspired by the ideas of others. Philosophers John Locke and Thomas Hobbes happen to be some of the most influential figures in our nations government. Their theories on the most ideal form of government have had lasting effects on the United States. Their ideas did not always agree with each other, but they still helped form the government that we have had for over two hundred years in America. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both English philosophers.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Locke and Thomas Hobbes’ views on humanity differed and it affects their views on government. The Enlightenment started from some key ideas put forth by two English political thinkers of the 1600s, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Both men experienced the political turmoil of England early in that century. However, they came to very different conclusions about government and human nature. ” John Locke believed that all people were born free, and equal with the three natural rights of life, liberty and to own property.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moreover, he believed in popular sovereignty, where the citizens have the right to choose how they should be governed instead of just having one ruler making all of the decisions. Locke believes that the purpose of the government is to protect its citizen and fulfill the people’s desires or else they will have the intention to overthrow the government that is not fulfilling its job. Even though Locke advocated for a democratic system of government, he did not believe it was the only valid system of government. He states in his book, “hence it is evident, that absolute monarchy, which by some men is counted the only government in the world, is indeed inconsistent with civil society, and so can be no form of civil-government at…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example of this is the idea that self compassion leads to self improvement. In a set of four experiments by the University of California, Berkeley, they concluded that, “taking an accepting approach to personal failure may make people more motivated to improve themselves,” and that is exactly what Ballister did (Breines and Chen 1). He saw his life as a lonely villain whose henchmen/sidekicks deserted him (Stevenson 83), and was constantly beaten by a rigged system, but when he reflected and came to terms with who he was, he was able to come out the other side as a conquering hero, destroying the civilians’ blind faith in the Institution (Stevenson 137). This is the heart of his change as a person, and his acceptance of himself and others made it possible for him to be the best version of himself. He changed over time, as do we all, meaning it is impossible for our identities to be determined in our earliest years.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes that without a ruler society will live in the State of Nature. This to Hobbes meant living in an almost civil war like society. Locke believed that in the state of nature people were good and honest, conflicts were resolved peacefully and justly. Locke believed that peace should be the status quo, and we can remain living this way as long as we respect each other. Hobbes believed that people can only live in peace when they turn over all rights to a sovereign.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    government. Hobbes ideas impact our daily lives mainly his belief that states that the people should give up some of their rights to a more absolute power to protect them and regulate the society around them. This idea is known as a social compact or contract that states that, in their natural state, Hobbes believed that people would fight only for their self-interest and attack those who were in pursuit of their interests. The only way to stop people from engaging in this natural act was to create a government that would enforce the law and protect people from their state of nature. Hobbes negative view towards the nature of humans parallels that of the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Prison Interview Paper

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is peoples own actions led them to this situation that they are in and ultimately have to deal with. It changes some people’s lives but not…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are five theories of Philosophy written into his context below which are “Social contract or contractarian, Classic liberalism or libertarianism, Marxism, Communitarians, and Capabilities approach”. Comparing each one of these political philosophy, theories will show how some may be similar to one another and how the different theories are. First to be up for discussion is the Social contract. Philosopher Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. These two philosopher’s “both wanted the public to ensure the right with the social compact but Locke purpose was also to protect nature rights” (Moore & Bruden, 2013, Chapter Chapter 11).…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That time of chaos led Hobbes to believe that an absolute monarch was the ideal form of government. Messier Illustrates, that In Hobbes theory of sovereignty, the sovereign holds absolute power over the subjects that are bound to obey him under the laws he establishes and enforces, a right granted to him by the establishment of the common wealth…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both theorists believe in natural rights and freedoms and how men establish governments in order to secure peace however they differ on the purpose of government. Hobbes believed the purpose of government is to impose law and order to prevent the state of war. Locke believed the purpose of government is to secure natural rights, namely man’s property and liberty. Both refer to a “state of nature” in which man exists without government, and both speak of risks in this state. However, while both speak of the dangers of a state of nature, Hobbes is more pessimistic, whereas Locke speaks of the potential benefits.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke (1632-1704) is another modern political philosopher who also had strong views on political nature, but differed from Hobbes. One of Locke’s main hopes through his writing is to destroy the idea of monarchial theory: “it is impossible that the rulers now on earth should make any benefit, or derive any the least shadow of authority from that, which is held to be the fountain of all power, Adam 's private dominion and paternal jurisdiction; so that he that will not give just occasion to think that all government in the world is the product only of force and violence, and that men live together by no other rules but that of beasts, where the strongest carries it, and so lay a foundation for perpetual disorder and mischief, tumult, sedition and rebellion, (things that the followers of that hypothesis so loudly cry out against) must of necessity find out another rise of government, another original of political power, and another way of designing and knowing the persons that have it,…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays