Frederick Douglass and Elizabeth Cady Stanton are both very important people in their respective fields. Frederick Douglass was a former slave who fought for the abolition of slavery; while, Elizabeth Cady Stanton was a women fighting for women's rights. Mr. Douglass had a famous speech called “What to the Slave is July 4th?”, and Mrs. Stanton had a declaration called “Declaration of sentiments”. Frederick Douglass and Elizabeth Cady Stanton had the same basic purpose for giving their respective speeches, however, they accomplished their end goal in very different ways, including the rhetorical devices they used, the type of speech they had, and the topic of their speeches. Frederick Douglass used a lot of rhetorical questions in his “What…
Lyddie’s actions toward the trespassing bear revealed that she was independent, strong, and smart. Her position in the family is basically the mother because she takes care of the kids and her mother since she is not very mentally stable. The bear became the family’s “undoing” by sending her mother, Rachel, and Agnes away to her Aunt Clarissa’s because Lyddie’s mother thought the bear was a sign of the devil. Aunt Clarissa told Lyddie’s mother that when the end drew near, the devil would walk the earth so she went to Aunt Clarissa’s to be with her sister when the end comes.…
Are the arguments posited by Patrick Henry and Thomas Paine effective? Of course they are, did they not persuade their people to fight against Britain, for their rights. Patrick Henry spoke about a war that had not yet begun, he spoke of it with urgency, as if there was no time to question it. He decided that he needed to get people involved in his speech, he needed people to think about what he was saying, to choose between the good and the bad. Thomas Paine did the same thing, he used emotion to get through the people sitting before him.…
Summary John Arthurs has a unique stance on world hunger and moral obligation and the way that we should handle these issues. He opens up his argument by analyzing one of Pete Singers rules “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it. “(666) Arthur believes that rule of life is a flawed one. He counters this statement by giving a scenario using Singers moral rule. Arthur states “All of us could help others by giving away or allowing others to use our bodies.…
A 7-2 majority ruled on the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford, citing a wide variety of constitutional grounds for support. One of the weakest arguments of this case was the argument for Dred Scott not being able to be classified as a citizen. As a result, he was not subject to the full right of freedoms and due process of law. Taney wrote that slaves lacked sovereignty and that they were not intended to be included by the framers of the Constitution (5). He writes that slaves were actually, “intended to be excluded from it.”…
The Emancipation Proclamation legally freed the slaves in states that were not under Union control as a reaction to the Dred Scott case. Lincoln’s motive behind the issuance of the Proclamation remains one of the most debated topic of the president. In the famous Lincoln-Douglass Debate in Charleston (National Historic SiteIllinois), Lincoln claimed that he “as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race” when asked to talk about his opinion about the equality between the black people and the white people. This led to the theory that Lincoln was a white-suprematist in nature, but still signed the Proclamation in order to win the war.…
My dear fellow workers and leaders, we have worked so hard to provide for our family. We have struggled so hard to pay for our living condition. We were promise to have good wages and work rule. What did we gain? Nothing!…
Edgar Allen Poe captivated everyone with the short story The Tell-Tale Heart, which forced readers to questions one's mental state, deciding on whether someone is guilty or innocent, whether someone is conscious of their actions, or if they are sane or criminally insane. The Tell-Tale Heart is the perfect example of the argument of whether an individual is aware of their actions and the crimes they commit or if they are possessed and driven to commit crimes by something in their mind, in which they could possibly use an insanity plea during their trial if they are caught. The narrator, who Edgar Allen Poe portrays as insane, is not, and during this essay, I will outline examples as to why he is not and that he is fully aware of the crimes that he is committing. The first example as to his premeditation is how he is explaining the story to the audience.…
There was a famous author by the name of Edgar Allen Poe. Poe was not an ordinary man to say the least. He is famous for making stories that are very odd and dark. Two of some of his most famous short stories are “The Tell-Tale Heart” and “The Black Cat.” Both of these short stories have a certain theme and that theme is Madness.…
The students board the Hogwarts Express train and are stopped once by an entity called a Dementor. In divination class, Professor Trelawney foresees Harry's death by reading tealeaves and finding the representation of a Grim, a large black dog symbolizing death. In the care of magical creature’s class, Hagrid introduces the students to Hippogriffs (see figure 2), large crosses between horses and eagles. Malfoy insults one of these beasts, Buckbeak, and is attacked. Malfoy drags out the injury in an attempt to have Hagrid fired and Buckbeak put to sleep.…
Chapter 25 “The Limits of Reason” The Enlightenment way of thinking encouraged people to use their intelligence to better the world around them. This brought about the Industrial Revolution with inventions of new machinery and technology. Some inventions were the steam engine, the cotton gin, iron bridges, and the birth of factories. Unfortunately, the factories brought about unsafe working conditions, the mistreatment of children and women for labor, and shifts that lasted for twelve-fourteen hours.…
Going Down Hill (An Analysis of Act IV Scene II) In life there are many things that we encounter that cause us to change our outlook on life. Some happen for the better and others there is no reason as to why it would happen at all. With these experiences come heavily influenced decisions that affect the mind and the way one functions. In this instance William Shakespeare’s famous play Macbeth the main character is heavily affected by several decision he made in the past and they later some back to haunt him in a negative way.…
In Poe’s detective stories “The Murders in the Rue Morgue” and “The Purloined Letter,” Dupin serves as a model of rational deduction. Dupin seems to have almost supernatural deductive ability in solving mysteries. Since Dupin’s use of reason to solve mysteries is central to these stories, determining Poe’s views on the nature of reasoning is critical to an understanding of their meaning. Hurh (2012) argues that the description of Dupin’s dual nature of “the creative and the resolvent” (Poe, 1841/1975, p.144) alludes to an analytical method called “the regress” (p. 471, 476).…
The prompt is true in the context of ethics: reason is the slave of the passions in the sense that practical reason alone cannot give rise to moral motivation. As a way of knowing, reason structures the world for us by laying a diagram of how objects and ideas are connected; however, this is merely cold information, devoid of any significance on its own. The passions, or emotions, will be the dominant driver for ethical activity because it is directly connected to our our personal preferences and how we feel about the choices we make. The impact of emotion in ethics can be emphasized in the widely known moral theory of utilitarianism, where the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the guiding principle of conduct. Yet, while…
Defined by a myriad of components that integrally meld into a complex of knowledge, human nature exists as an enigma with seemly unrelated pieces. While initially, some of these components may seem to be antithetical, the ambiguity found within each individual dictates that even the most polar factors are closely interwoven as with the case of emotion and reason. This interconnection, and how it functions to formulate knowledge, is an integral capacity that allows mankind to explore the skepticisms that surround the discernment of truth. The article, “Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds” by Elizabeth Kolbert, depicts this ambiguous relationship between emotion and reason, but also piques the question: To what extent does emotion play a role in the formulation of reason? First and foremost, there exists ambiguity within the relationship of emotion and reason due to discrepancies found within psychological factors such as confirmation bias and the self-interest theory.…