The Missouri Compromise: Detrimental Effects Of The Civil War

Improved Essays
Many political issues had detrimental effects that caused the Civil War. One of those issues being the Missouri Compromise, which took place in 1820. The reasoning behind the Missouri compromise was due to the South feeling that since the North had gained Maine, as a free state, that the political power would be much stronger than it would be in the South. Therefore, Missouri was to become a slave state, which then also created the cutoff line for free and slave states. The Missouri compromise was not a problem that was solved quickly, the entire process took about two years to solve. This is stretch compared to the compromise in the late 18th century at the constitutional convention. Yes, the Missouri Compromise did solve issues; that was

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Prior to the time of the Missouri compromise, there were an equal number of slave states to free states thus there was an equal balance of power in congress. Once Missouri had applied for admission into the union there was instant disapproval from the northern territories for they had thought that the south already had a substantial amount of power. The Missouri compromise was a way to balance congress of free and slave states. The compromise itself was passed in 1820 giving Missouri the title of a slave state and Maine the title of a free state. Therefore it settled a rising dispute between the slave and free territories.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One event that contributed the Civil war was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This allowed for new territories to decide if they were a slave state or a free state by a popular vote. This act undid the Missouri Compromise and started the disagreement between the pro/anti-slavery groups. The effect of this was fighting and violence that became known as Bleeding Kansas and this had troubled the nation. The Missouri compromise had kept the Union from falling apart which is why it eventually led to the Civil war.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the Missouri Compromise there was a lot of tension between the North and South because of slavery. Though it became even more heated after the Missouri’s 1819 request for admission into the Union as a slave state, which threatened the balance between slave and free states. The reason why the balance was disrupted was because before the request from Missouri there were an even amount of slave and free states. As well as, it would set a precedent for congressional consensus to the increase of slavery. So, to help ease the tension between the states Congress created a two-part compromise, which is known as the Missouri Compromise.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This eventually led up to the Civil War. Northern states did not like the Missouri compromise because they felt like the Southern states already had too much power. The northern states made The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 \ to ban…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Luckily, the Civil War was delayed due to various settlements between political parties regarding slavery- such as the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was proposed by Representative Henry Clay from Kentucky. Clay came up with this after Missouri demanded to become a state, which would have upset the existing balance among free and slave states. The compromise resulted in Missouri admitted as a slave state and Maine carved out of Massachusetts as a free state.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Missouri's Compromise was needed because they couldn't buy Missouri by itself because the count was at 11 free states and 11 state slaves so if Missouri was bought it needed to join as either a slave state or as a free state and it would upset the balance of the free to slave states to have equal say. So when Maine requested to join as a free state they saw it as a chance and that's when the Missouri Compromise came in place and there was then 12 to 12 slave to free states at the time so it didn't upset the balance. Thomas Jefferson felt that it was unconstitutional and was violating the Fifth Amendment that guaranteed citizens of "life, liberty, and property" and slaves were property. The Dred Scott decision was a decision made by the…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.Democracy is a society chooses its presidents or other members of government by voting to their liking, rather than having the legislature vote based on their own interests. The legislature would usually choose people based on their wealth, land, religion, and of course their race, if they were anything but white then they were out of the race. The Missouri Compromise and the Corrupt Bargain were contributing factors in the rise of democracy. The Missouri Compromise was a deal made based on the balance of free and slave states. When Missouri wanted to be a slave state they had to add Maine as a free state so they remained balanced.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Civil War predictable? Did any events indefinitely cause the South to desire a split from the North? The North and the South had a growing tension between them for many reasons, and the northern abolitionists encouraged a Civil War through their actions of protest. Although many Americans were affected minimally by the changes of the nation, abolitionists inevitably foresaw a Civil War because the growing tensions between the North and the South became apparent in political and social changes, slavery issues, and the growing occurrence of rebellions. Political and social changes occurred in many ways, including The Second Great Awakening, Lincoln’s presidential election to office, the way the North and the South dealt with one another,…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe the Civil War was fought over the issue of slavery, state’s rights, and also the power to control the West. What ultimately caused the Civil War would be the Compromise of 1850. Other main factors that caused the Civil War would be John Brown’s raid, the Second Great Awakening, and also the involvement of women in the Abolitionist movement. The reason as to why the Compromise of 1850 was the main cause of the Civil War would be due to the fact that it increased sectionalism, did not solve the issue of slavery, and also paved the way for the Fugitive Slave Laws of 1850. The reason why these events are the most significant are that they are the most pivotal events to occur during this time, which ultimately paved the way for the first…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was a series of congressional statutes passed in September of 1850, in which the United States Congress sought out to settle conflicts between those who opposed slavery in the North and those in favor of slavery in the South. There is much speculation about what the United States would be like today without this Compromise. Which leads to the question, should the Compromise have ever been approved? Still, regardless if the Compromise was approved or not, the Civil War was an inevitable event in American history. The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt to solve tensions between the North and the South over the expansion of slavery, specifically into Texas, which was a territory obtained by the United States in the Mexican…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1820, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. This compromise agreed to admit Missouri as a slave state and then admit Maine as a free state to keep the balance of free and slave states in the country. It also created the 36’ 30° line. The 36’ 30° line was an imaginary line on the southern border of Missouri above which it was agreed new states could not hold slaves. Many in the south saw this as an act in support of the abolition of slavery, which helped to increase tensions between the north and south over the issue of slavery (Missouri n.d.).…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Mexican War ended and the Missouri Compromise On February 2nd of 1848, the war between Mexico and America came to an end at the city of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The war lasted for 2 years. Mexico and America was fighting for the land of California and New Mexico and who would receive it. In 1844, Democrat James Polk won the election and became president.…

    • 2689 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays