The application of such a theory may not be as successful as it is expected to be. Indeed, giving power to the people may foster Liberal Peace in some countries, but applying the theory to a war-shattered country does not work. Moreover, the notion of peace, that is very important in the Liberal Peace theory, is questionable. Does peace only exist in democracies ? Technically, peace is the absence of conflict and some undemocratic countries fit that definition. The economic institutions also tend to foster Liberal Peace as they help to reconstruct countries and work for peace and if the country does not respect the liberties of its people then, the institutions no longer provide help, this is what happened in Uzbekistan. But the problem is that if the two institutions decide to stop financing the countries that are damaged then it is the population that will suffer. Thus, the Liberal Peace theory cannot be applied easily in world
The application of such a theory may not be as successful as it is expected to be. Indeed, giving power to the people may foster Liberal Peace in some countries, but applying the theory to a war-shattered country does not work. Moreover, the notion of peace, that is very important in the Liberal Peace theory, is questionable. Does peace only exist in democracies ? Technically, peace is the absence of conflict and some undemocratic countries fit that definition. The economic institutions also tend to foster Liberal Peace as they help to reconstruct countries and work for peace and if the country does not respect the liberties of its people then, the institutions no longer provide help, this is what happened in Uzbekistan. But the problem is that if the two institutions decide to stop financing the countries that are damaged then it is the population that will suffer. Thus, the Liberal Peace theory cannot be applied easily in world