The lecturer casts doubts on the reading passage assumption that a reduction in one day of work in the work week would be better not only for the employee but for the company's profit and for the overall economy. Therefore he brings criticism to the three arguments presented in the reading passage in order to prove that the benefits assumed in the passage aren't likely to happen.
The first point that the lecturer disagrees is with the passage assumption that reducing the weekly work time of an employee might increase profits since the workers would be less error prone since they would be less tired. The lecturer explains that this reduction might not affect neither profits nor the employee's life. According to him, the company would have to
The first point that the lecturer disagrees is with the passage assumption that reducing the weekly work time of an employee might increase profits since the workers would be less error prone since they would be less tired. The lecturer explains that this reduction might not affect neither profits nor the employee's life. According to him, the company would have to