There’s no argument about the little to no voter fraud. The Indiana Supreme Court did not even allow the law because of fraud, but because it seems like nothing would be wrong with making an ID a requirement (Carden).If fraud was the main argument for Republicans to create voter ID laws then, as DeBerry states, “they would have moved to abolish voting by mail” (Virginia). Justice Dickson stated that it isn’t feasible to regulate voting by mail so they would not do it (Carden). But states like Indiana are willing to spend $2.2 million in five years to enforce the new law (Murphy). Yet, states cannot seem to keep DMVs or voting sites
There’s no argument about the little to no voter fraud. The Indiana Supreme Court did not even allow the law because of fraud, but because it seems like nothing would be wrong with making an ID a requirement (Carden).If fraud was the main argument for Republicans to create voter ID laws then, as DeBerry states, “they would have moved to abolish voting by mail” (Virginia). Justice Dickson stated that it isn’t feasible to regulate voting by mail so they would not do it (Carden). But states like Indiana are willing to spend $2.2 million in five years to enforce the new law (Murphy). Yet, states cannot seem to keep DMVs or voting sites