The Importance Of The Serfs In Medieval Times

Improved Essays
The Serf’s lives were controlled by the lords in a variety of ways during the medieval period. A Serf is a person who works farms under the direction of the lord’s estate. A lord was simply a person who did many things in the medieval period. The first way the lords controlled the Serfs was through debt and economics. In the document Manorial Records of Bernehorne it explained that the lords did not want the serfs to move away in order to provide themselves with a better life, the lords wanted to keep the Serfs tied to the land. In order for the lords to keep the serfs tied to the land they had to collect money to keep them in debt so they could not move away. Another way the Serfs were controlled through debt and economics was to charge them to get married, the serfs also had to pay rent for the land they owned and they even had to pay a death tax. Fortunately there were jobs that had to be done, for example carrying wood and manure which only paid 8 pence, but for completing the work that serf received 3 meals per day. The Manorial Court document was similar in terms of the lords controlling the Serf’s lives. For example “William Jordan in mercy for bad ploughing on the lord’s land. Pledge, Arthur. Fine, 6d.” Essentially the lords looked for any way possible to charge the Serfs to keep them in debt. …show more content…
The lords played many roles during the medieval period. Such as one lord may have been a judge during trial and the jury of that same trial. It was seen as it being unfair that one lord could do several things, and use his powers against the Serfs. The lords seen the serfs as their own personal slaves. As they worked the lords farms and they made mistakes, like bad ploughing they would gotten punished by getting sent to prison or being charged with hefty fines which kept them in debt. Then they were forced to stay tied to the land and under the lord’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The lords were important and was the land owning nobility under the king of the country that they lived in. The minor nobility had the ability to tax the serfs on their land. This led to a very high tax on the serfs because they were doubly had taxed once by the minor nobility and again by the king.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Slavery in the American south and Serfdom in Russia are an example of Labor Expiation in the in the 18th and 19th century. Both of those human bondages are worthless and have some similarity. In addition to some deference Slavery and Sers have some freedom. Even though, it has been said that a serfs owned "only his belly".…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In medieval England, social status and rank are very important in everyday life. Everybody was in a class and rank depending on that class. You couldn’t change your class, marry outside of your class, and you had specific jobs to do. In medieval times, you couldn’t change your class.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are angry white voters today any different than England medieval peasants? The peasants in England during the medieval period aren’t so different than todays’ angry white voters. “Angry white voters” can be better known as the Trump’s supporters. Donald Trump is running for president and he is getting the majority of his support from the angry white voters.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Serfdom, was an institution of forced agricultural labor, was widespread in Europe in the middle Ages. By the early modern period, it disappeared from most parts of Western Europe while persisting in most parts of Eastern Europe and, in particular, in the Russian Empire until the late 18th century. Serfdom was the dominant form of relation between peasants and nobility in the 17th century…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Past serfs were now given a lot more equal rights than they once had, if for whatever reason they found themselves in a court of law they would be given a surely fair trial with te right to an attorney which they didn 't have before, they were automatically assumed guilty due to the noble powers which were in charge of the law. By bringing in a local…

    • 1084 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medieval Serfdom

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Serfdom was introduced by the Roman Empires who took over their families and worked in Roman slavery (Newman, Serfs in Middle Ages.) Medieval serfs didn't receive their land as free gift; for the use of it they owned certain duties to their master(Life of Serfs.) Serfs who occupied land were required to…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The servants worked in exchange for room, board, lodging and their freedom. This was not slavery, as the indentured servants of men and women signed a contract by which they agreed to work in the exchange for something. As the demands for laborers grew so did the cost, man landowners felt threatened by the newly freed servants and their…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The feudal system was a way of organising people” (BBC, 2016). They were split into four categories; Monarchs, Tenants in Chief, sub-tenants and peasants. Monarchs were kings and queens. They were powerful and had lots of money. Their choice in clothing clearly reflected this (Figure 2) as they wore fancy, expensive clothing.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Servants were seen as second hand citizens. and could not hold property or even marry unless their master allowed it. Servants began to protest more and more. Servants were finding their conditions unacceptable though most saw rebellion not to be the answer. Many servants began to flee.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They had power and a strong influence in political affairs. The monarch and nobles were basically equal in power which is why it was hard for the monarch to rule absolutely the way Louis XIV. In France, the peasants were free from serfdom and although they were still heavily taxed, hey did not have to worry about serfdom as it was nearly abolished. In eastern countries, however, serfdom was still prominent in society. The main reason for that was because the nobles benefitted from taxing them and eastern lords had more political power.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The servants here had very little amounts of food and rest. Not only were they subject to poor conditions but they often had very strict rules. In most contracts the servants could not buy or sell property and they were prohibited from marrying. If a female servant gave birth to a baby with a man they were not married to she could either have her indenture extended, have to pay a large fine, or get whipped and often all three punishments were received. One of the most intense acts of human exploitation through indentured servitude was displayed when masters would extend a servant 's contract after their indenture was already completed or extend it while selling them.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Feudalism, England’s alternative to a government during the Middle Ages, played a significant role in the age of war and monarchs, and in some ways continues to have a role in today’s government. The workings of feudalism are simple. A king, or lord, gives land, also known as fiefs, ownership to nobles, also known as vassals, and in return for the king’s overall protection, the vassals would be responsible for providing their support and defense in the form of knights. In reciprocation for their service, knights were given smaller sized fiefs, this was known as subinfeudation. The peasants, or serfs, would do all upkeep of the land.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    England was a difficult place to live in the medieval times if one was not born into a noble family. If one was not considered to be a noble from birth, then that person would likely have little to nothing for their entire life. The only real way that a person could improve their position would be to become a part of the church or perform a great feat that would cause a king to crown them as a noble. This was because there were only three real classes in England in the medieval times: the nobility, the clergy, and the peasants. The nobility consisted of kings and other people that were rich, had a lot of land, or held important positions in the government.…

    • 2356 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Comparison of Japanese and European Feudalism Feudalism is defined by Webster’s Dictionary as “the system of political organization prevailing in Europe from the 9th to about the 15th centuries having as its basis the relation of lord to vassal with all land held in fee and as chief characteristics homage, the service of tenants under arms and in court, wardship, and forfeiture.” Feudalism dictated much of the Medieval era in Europe, but lasted much longer, and more successful, in Japan, lasting from the mid-12th century to the mid-19th century. European feudalism was almost completely defined by the relationship between a king and his nobleman, lords or barons, to whom he would grant land based on personal relationships. The fiefdom, the land which the king owned but given to the lord, would be ultimately controlled by the king but cultivated by the lord and his workers. The workers were…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays