The Importance Of Separation Of Powers In The United States

Improved Essays
The separation of powers is the foundation of our government today. The separation of powers is where each branch of government keeps the other in check to ensure that no one branch becomes more powerful than another. Also, the Separation of Powers allows citizens to live carefree lives. Our government and country as a whole today would drastically change without it. This change could destroy the peaceful lives we live today, due to having power corrupting those who gain more of it. Therefore, preventing tyranny is why the Separation of Powers is as important today as it was when the Founders wrote the U.S. Constitution. The Separation of Powers was important to our Founders because it prevented tyranny. Tyranny is where an authority is using its power to set cruel and oppressive rule upon its citizens. Luckily, the Separation of Powers separates the government into three branches, the judicial branch, the legislative branch, and the executive branch to prevent such things from happening. “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, judiciary, in the hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny… (L)iberty …show more content…
In an article, it’s stated that the executive branch used drones in order to spy on people who were potentially terrorists. However, these people were completely innocent and an outrage began. People were accusing the executive branch of using their power abusively because they violated these citizens’ rights. These people also stated that they didn’t feel safe now knowing what the executive branch has done. Consequentially, checks and balances come into play in order to make sure the executive branch does not abuse their power once more. Without the checks and balances, the executive branch could have enhanced this abuse to a more drastic and abusive

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Guard Against Tyranny Dbq

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The separation of powers ensured there will be no tyranny because the powers are all separated and couldn’t be an…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote from James Madison declares that the purpose for separation of powers is to make sure that not one person will hold too much power, no matter it be to make laws and enforce them, enforce law and explain them, or any combination of the three. If someone were to have power in more than one field, they would be classified as a tyrant. This is why today, we do not let someone in legislative, executive, and judicial at the same time because no matter what kind of government, a tyrant can still exist within that government. To make sure that no one person can be a part of more than one branch, Articles 1, 2, and 3 state the position of each branch. Article one, Section one gives the legislative power to congress.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If one branch had more power than the other then it can be an act of tyranny. There are many forms of tyranny, like I said, and there are many ways to prevent tyranny. All in all, that is how the Constitution will guard against tyranny. Tyranny is like a burglar that can take over an defenseless home or person. The Constitution is the superhero that can stop that burglars from stealing.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Checks and balances is where each of the 3 branches of government (Judicial, Legislative, and Executive), check on each other, or have power overone another.(Doc C) Each branch of government is able to check on one another and have some power over the other branches. For example, Congress can override a presidential veto, so the present can’t hold too much power. This evidence explains how the Constitution guards against tyranny because the other branches of government can check on it and if needed, exercise their power over said…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Checks and balances were created to keep one branch of government from having control over another branch of government. In Document C, it says, “… the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” This means the branches of government all check each other to make sure one branch does not have more power than another. The branches can approve or disapprove with things the other branches have decided on. If one branch became over powered than it could take over the government resulting in tyranny.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of Powers is the most important value in the Constitution guard against tyranny. In document B James Madison states “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct”. This show that each branch shall have its own distinct powers and not be totally connected. The constitution of the United State states “All Legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in Congress of the U.S. (Senate and House of Representatives)... The executive power shall be vested in a President of the U.S……

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The separation of power also creates a checks and balances system which prevents one of the branches of government from having more power over another. Ultimately resulting in a equal or limited government. Without these systems limiting the government's powers and keeping it balanced the government would be controlled by a single group of people (tyranny). Our government today is a clear democracy run by our three branches united so I’d say our systems have ultimately create a balanced or limited form of government in the…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers defend against tyranny by separating the three branches, legislative, executive, judicial. They should be extremely separate, Madison said in a federalist paper that, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” (Doc B). Some examples that they are separate is that they all have different jobs, Congress makes laws, the president and his cabinet enforce them, and the justices of the supreme court interpret them. They are only supposed to do their job, not the other branches. You cannot have the president fire judges because they disagree, it would lead to politics influencing the cases.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the founding fathers did not want one single branch of the government to have too much power over the others. Separation of Powers allows for Checks and Balances. The legislative branch is responsible for passing laws that the executive can enact or veto. The Judiciary can review whether or not a bill, or a law is lawful under the Constitution. Moreover, Congress could remove the president if he or she is not doing his or her job properly.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers refers to the idea to guard against tyranny and preserve liberty and justice. Separation of powers was held that major institution should be divided and dependent upon each other so that one power would not exceed that of the other two branches. Today, Separation of powers is known as the checks and balances necessary for the government while others seems to think that the separation of powers is a destruction to our American government. In the book "American Democracy in Peril" by William E. Hudson, the author makes a significant argument regarding chapter 1 separation of powers, he states that our American government is officially inefficient, unresponsive, unaccountable, indecisive, and hypocritical. He views the need for separation of powers as inadequate, not democratic, and chaotic.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The separation of powers is between branches of the national government. In a letter written to James Madison, Thomas Jefferson talked about the three branches of government and then he explains to him that, “The principle of the Constitution is that of a separation of legislative, executive, and judiciary functions except in cases specified”(document 2). This shows how the constitution guards against tyranny because it shows the separation of powers in the branches is what keeps things going smoothly in the government forms of control and splits it as equally as possible. Thomas Jefferson was also one of the founding fathers, he even wrote the declaration of independence and later he was the third president of the United States. His past affects his anti tyranny and his view on the separation of powers being crucial to that because he had a lot of history in working in the government so he knew just how helpful the organization between the branches, beneficial it can be to compromise, and how helpful it is for the people.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just Government

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The US Constitution created three branches, the executive, the legislative and the judicial. These branches are independent but have actions they can take to ensure that the other two don’t misuse their power. Power was divided between houses and each house checked every other house so that there would be no excessive power. (Evidence)Due to this, the three branches have a balance between governmental power. The system of checks and balances tried to create a better government for the people by ensuring that no branch of the government had excessive power.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why did the Founders feel that dividing power was necessary? The Founders felt that dividing power was necessary because it prevents tyranny and ensures that there is a separation of powers within the government system, thus maintaining a balance. 3. Compare and contrast Dual Federalism and Cooperative Federalism.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, the separation of powers as seen can be fundamental in keeping the government in check. This stops there from being the same people holding power in many parts of the government, and thus abusing power. As seen separations of power is necessary to protect from abuse of power from the government, and everyday people’s rights, as well as to make sure that there is no corruption with the people in power and to make sure they are doing their…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays