Utilitarianism: The Difference Between Morality And Ethics

Great Essays
Every day we face ethical dilemmas, it is up to us to determine what ethical stance is best. In this paper, I will be discussed why I prefer the Utilitarianism stance and what ethical dilemma I find best out of the two given in our assignment. Before we get into any more detail we must understand what morality and ethics are, I will go in great detail to explain the difference between both.
Morality is a major factor in our life making decisions, one must understand what morality is. In our textbook, it is stated that morality is set of fundamental rules that guide our actions (Solomon, Robert C., Kathleen Marie Higgins, and Clancy Martin. 497), Moral theories are a large complex mostly seen as an important conduct code of that is accepted
…show more content…
The Stanford encyclopedia declares a view of Utilitarianism is one ought to maximize the overall good — that is, consider the good of others as well as one's own good (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.) I ethically decided that this stance was the best for the situation given to us. Ultimately, I want to make everyone happy, therefore I will leave the choice of the staff choosing if they should take the experimental medication. I sense that everybody ought to have the right to decide for themselves. We are all human beings and have the right to determine what we will put inside our bodies. I would not only please everyone else but most importantly myself. I do not think that I can ever decide such a reasoning for anyone other them myself. My moral values will not allow it I know deep down that it is wrong to deny the choice to the people, they all have their own right to select what is best for …show more content…
These situations can bring the worst in people and cause chaos. We must stay confident that the experimental medication will work, we must allow the staff to make their own judgements. Ultimately up to them to take the medication or not, I can feel best about myself knowing that I did my finest to please everyone. I honestly cannot see any other way to go by this situation, I cannot live with myself knowing that I took away this individual right to decide for their own. Nevertheless, Virtue as stated in our text book Aristotle’s philosophy we enjoy doing what is right (Solomon, Robert C., Kathleen Marie Higgins, and Clancy Martin. 522.) Equally important, I enjoy doing what is right but to some they may interpret right and wrong differently which is why I favor utilitarianism, I enjoy doing what is right but I myself also enjoy making everyone happy. In my family, we are thought to always strive to make right judgements doing so, we will make them

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas Essay I have chosen to analyze case two and this paper will outline my understanding, exploration, and final decision-making process as it applies to the ethical dilemmas presented. Understanding the Dilemmas This case has a variety of ethical dilemmas occurring across several contexts (personal, societal, and organizational). Reflecting on the theories and conceptual models presented in this course, I found the Five Faces of Oppression (Young, 2014) and the Ecological Systems Theory (Bronfenbrenner, 1979) helpful in conceptualizing these various circumstances and contexts.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    PART A Question 1 Utilitarianism Scale: -15 (least happy) to 15 (happiest) Table 1: Benefits and Detriments to Each Stakeholder Stakeholders Tell Customers About Condoitin Don’t Tell Customers About Condoitin Benefits Detriments Benefits Detriments Ming Moral satisfaction (+10) High chance of losing job (-15), less commission (-$5 per sale) (-5) Increased commission ($5 per sale) (+5), keeps the job (+15)…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To study ethics and to break down the different approaches one must look at the nonabsolutisms such as antinomianism, situationism and generalism. These three approaches define different perspectives that one may use when coming to an ethical decision. The three approaches will be defined and examples will be given of each of these approaches. Concluding with an analysis of the deficiencies and assets of each and which I feel is the strongest or weakest. Antinomianism has been described by Geisler (2010), as “against/instead of law, holds that there are no binding moral laws, that everything is relative” (p.22).…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Divya Upadhyay PHIL 130 11/01/17 Professor Skibra A Bilateral Approach to Morality The core of the following analysis is centralized around two opposing theories formulated to constitute the grounds of morality: Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics. Through its respective beliefs, each perspective is initially explained and subsequently applied to the fundamental issue raised in Case 1, The Ethics of Lying, to provide an answer for what actions are regarded as morally “correct”. Morality denotes the following: the extent to which an action is classified as “correct”.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This essay considers whether using an ethical toolbox is the best way to make ethical choices. To that consideration, I acknowledge that the ethical challenges I face are diverse and complicated. I wonder if it is better to rely on one philosophical perspective in my life or consider several. Mill argues that we measure how others and ourselves will benefit or suffer as a result of our action when considering ethical questions.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Explanations of Morals (Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held) Morals (mor – als) Noun; plural 1. a lesson, especially one concerning what is right or prudent, that can be derived from a story, a piece of information or an experience. 2.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics The subject of ethics could be very questionable, particularly when the three real speculations are competing for attention. Understanding why individuals respond to particular circumstances the way they do is helpful from any stance in life whether personal or professional. In the accompanying sections, ethics will be characterized, as well the three hypothesis; virtue, deontology and utilitarian. The likenesses and contrasts of these three hypotheses will be talked about, as will the contrasts in how every hypothesis addresses morality and ethics.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the course of philosophy 210, we have been exposed to many different theories that reward one aspect on what morality. The most recent one, Ross theory of right conduct, which gives a very different aspect on morality as the past theories. In this paper, it will be explain and review Ross theory of right conduct, how it differs from all the other theories, and how we can apply it. The main difference between Ross theory of right conduct and the previously viewed moral theories, such as consequentialism and utilitarianism, is that amount of pleasure is not the entire thing use to judge for what is morally right to do.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Personal ethics plays an important role in every aspect of our lives. From the great classical philosophers, such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, to the more modern ones such as Immanuel Kant, philosophical ideologies have attempted to answer moral dilemmas such as right and wrong or good and evil for millennia. In this paper, I will discuss and share my personal ethical framework and how that framework applies to my personal and professional responsibilities. Theories Aligned with Personal Moral Framework.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics is a branch of philosophy that, at its core, seeks to understand and to determine how human actions can be judged as right or wrong. There are multiple variations and subclasses of ethical theories. These theories that help us with decision making can be challenged or critiqued. In particular Mill’s Utilitarianism, an ethical theory that promoted the greatest happiness for the greatest number, was criticized by Charles Taylor in his article The Diversity of Goods. The article written by Charles Taylor argues a utilitarian and consequentialist conception of morality leaves out essential aspects of human experience that are integral to our moral lives.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freda's Case

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nurses play a central role in advocating for their patients. In the case of Freda, the moral conflict between the nurse and physician revolves around the implementation of a feeding tube, in which the nurses feel does not respect Freda’s wishes. In utilitarianism, the beneficence principle means the value of the good (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 440). In Freda’s case she defines good as dying peacefully. In Kantianism, the principle of autonomy states that the competent individual has the right to be self-determining (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 440).…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This utilitarian approach is helpful for making ethical issues. For example in this Ford Pinto case, the economic cost is the main problem in this company. The choice between two safety devices in product design in determining which is more likely to reduce death and injury. Therefore, the utilitarian determination brings a high moral level, though, in some cases, they turn out to be…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pettit's Unprofessional

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Most people pause at some point in their lives to reflect on their own principles and on the practical implications of those principles, and they sometimes think about what principles people should have or which moral standards can best be justified. Hence, when a person accepts a moral principle, when that principle is part of his or her personal moral code, then naturally the person believes the principle is important and well justified. Therefore, it is viewed that morality does not just mean the principles of conduct that we embrace, but also the values, ideals, and aspirations that shape our lives. Consequently, the life that each of us forge and the way we understand that life is part of our morality. The decisions people make in their…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays