Plea Negotiations Analysis

Improved Essays
Locally there are drug, domestic violence, mental health, and family court. Drug courts are judicially supervised court dockets that handle cases of non-violent substance-abusing offenders under the adult, juvenile, family and tribal justice systems. Domestic violence courts generally coordinate with community partners that provide services for victims of domestic abuse. Mental health court means a judicial program that provides a specialized docket for defendants with mental illnesses. Mental health court makes decision about the state of mind of people charged with criminal offences. Family court handles cases involving domestic issues such as divorce and child custody. Criminal court empowered to hear and decide on cases involving offenses …show more content…
However, the more fiscally responsible idea would be reforming plea negotiations. Deidre M. Bowen examined a reformed system of plea bargaining in King County, Washington, which included a structured process for handling cases (Walker, 2015). there were some clear rules on plea negotiations and higher levels of supervision for attorneys. This new process uses a horizontal approach to prosecution, in which cases are initially handled by the Charging Unit and then passed to the Early Plea Unit. Cases that are not settled through a guilty plea are then handled by the Trial Unit (Walker, 2015). The main rules for plea negotiations are that plea negotiations are not available to any case that bypasses the Early Plea Unit. These changes eliminate the traditional informality of plea negotiations and, through the Early Plea Unit, centralize negotiations and presumably make them more consistent (Walker, 2015). There were greater efficiency because the rules were clear to everyone and there was greater openness and less chance of misunderstanding because the rules of the game (Walker, …show more content…
Although there has been a number of wrongful convictions, suspects should not be able to abuse the system. (Walker, 2015) Protection of individual rights requires recognition of the possibility of error in the criminal justice process (Walker, 2015). The appeal process is lengthy and time-consuming (Walker, 2015). The appeal process is almost automatic for individuals sentenced to death (Walker,2015). Many appeals are filed by the convicts in hopes of overturning their conviction or to change their sentence to life imprisonment. However, no consideration is taken in respect to the cost to taxpayers for the local, state, and federal government to respond to and process these appeals. Many states have laws providing funds for the legal defense and appeals for convicted felons. That money could be better spent elsewhere. The money that would be saved could be spent on bettering the nation and domestic problems in our country. This money earmarked to help felons could help get the homeless of the streets, feed the hungry, and help educate the youth. Also, if the courts allow the unlimited amounts of appeals then people will continue to file frivolous claims because they know they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Defense counsels started to feel that defendants will not be able to pay for the time involved to go to trial, but the prosecutors feel even though they work harder at a trial they are not having to decide on a sentence in a plea bargain. The judges now have the burden to determine and announce all sentences to defendants. The ban on plea bargaining did not affect the sentences of violent crime charges, but it did drastically change the sentences of Felony 3 guilty outcomes. The defendants convicted of burglary, larceny and destruction of property found themselves receiving longer sentences.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this research paper, an overview of what plea bargaining is, its incentives, and its disadvantages will be discussed in order to show that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, as well as…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile Court handles cases which deal with deprived and neglected children who are under eighteen. The Juvenile Court also handles cases for anyone who is under the age of seventeen and has delinquent and unruly offenses. When a minor wants to get married the Juvenile Court will hear the cases and they handle cases for child support matters coming from divorce cases and taking away parental rights. The State Court only has seventy courts and one hundred and twenty three judges. The jurisdiction is limited within one county and the judges in the State Courts will handle misdemeanors such as traffic violations, issues search warrants and hold preliminary hearings.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining brings to light the unreciprocated power that the prosecutor has due to the nature of the criminal justice system in America. Plea Deals Demonstrate Prosecutorial Power…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Thus, it is imperative that all actors in the criminal justice and court systems use plea bargain correctly every time. Plea Bargains have changed the appearance of the criminal justice and court system over time. Having a fluid process for plea bargains has become vital in the criminal justice system. The use of a plea bargain will impact…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Making it much harder for a guilty plea to be tossed. This also brings into question his or her creditability, changing your statement after some time to think about it may seem odd to some. Changing a plea is easier done by the defendant, if he or she has favorable evidence against the prosecutors case. This evidence may be the lack of creditability the prosecutors main witness, DNA evidence or something that can confirm his or her…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of plea bargaining leaves questions for its relevancy in a court case such as in Paul Hayes’s sentence. A settlement gives way for abstention to forgo their constitutional rights to manage a decreased prison sentence. Each payment occurs to stimulate a defendant in evading a trail by a formal or informal agreement with the prosecutor. This right to make a contract is to be followed by way of a guilty plea or nolo contendere plea. Nonetheless, the, “constitutional defect with plea bargaining is systemic, not episodic.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The District Attorney has discretionary power to decide the disposition of cases. One of the primary ways that the District Attorney uses its’ discretion is in how he processes plea-bargaining. The District Attorney may reduce a defendants’ exposure to a crime if he provides some pieces of information that he needs to prosecute a bigger player in the narcotics trade. It has been said that the administration of justice is a selective process in which only those cases that will not overload the system will ultimately be prosecuted (Cole, 1970)…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A plea bargain is a procedure that prosecutors use to avoid a trial as juries or even judges can be unpredictable in their behavior and may rule against them. Prosecutors like sure things as does the State and a plea bargain gains an admission of guilt without the right to an appeal in exchange for leniency. However, a plea bargain may induce prosecutors to over-charge a suspect in an attempt to bully them into gaining a plea bargain. Plea bargains are also not conducted in open court so there is a lack of transparency that occurs (Carp, Stidham, Manning, & Holmes, 2017, p. 226). Judicial Restraint is a stricter interpretation of the law based upon its constitutional merits, legislative merits or legal precedent.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal justice system is made of rules that are in place to not only protect the victim and the convicted, but also the prosecution and the defense attorneys. The system is governed by these guidelines from the time a police officer suspects a crime all the way to the day the offender is released from prison. The steps for an individual to be convicted of a crime must start with the arrest, and fallow the process in order to the pre-trial, trial, and appeals. There are different guidelines that apply to state and federal cases. To effectively understand the criminal justice process a person must start at the bottom and follow the progression of the charge.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays