The Importance Of US Leadership In The Free World

Superior Essays
The United States (U.S.) government has no greater role in today’s world than to provide strong leadership to the global community and to ensure that we safeguard our national and strategic interests from physical and economic encroachment and provide unfretted protection to our U.S. citizens in an uncertain and unpredictable world. America’s prosperity as a nation remains unapparelled in the world history and our leadership within the international community serves as an exemplar for all states to follow.
The national security of the U.S. is of paramount concern to our nation’s leadership and its citizenry. We are currently facing one of the greatest challenges to our economic well-being as a nation and a leader in the free world today. We
…show more content…
will not stand idly by and watch as nations unnecessarily use military force or unrestrained economic coercion as instruments to control contested areas or areas of territorial dispute. The first choice of any government is to use diplomacy to try and avoid an altercation or conflict at all costs. If the act of diplomacy is not sufficient or does not meet the strategic goals and objectives of the U.S. and its territories, we may as a last resort have to use limited armed force. In as such, the U.S. maintains a strong and agile force in readiness to guard the sole interests of the U.S. and its allies to meet any threat to vital U.S. interests and strategic objectives. Reluctantly, due to our nation 's needs, it is essential that we focus more strategically, which may cause some countries concern as we slowly change direction from being the world’s preeminent guardian for states in …show more content…
is closely watching China’s ongoing relationship with Eritrea and Saudi Arabia, which annexed the worn-torn nation of Yemen in 2018, after a three-year war with the Iranian-supported Houthi forces. U.S. naval forces became involved in the conflict after repeated attacks on maritime shipping and U.S. naval assets in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. The threat to the freedom of navigation transiting through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait to reach the Suez Canal was the main catalyst for conflict in the year 2018, and it remains highly volatile today. The relationship with China, Eritrea, and Saudi Arabia have many strategic implications for the U.S. as the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is a critical maritime waterway where the freedom of navigation is essential for U.S. trade and transit of U.S. Naval vessels supporting vital interests in the Mediterranean Sea. The U.S. will continue to be the vanguard for freedom of navigation and will use its diplomatic and military resources to their fullest to ensure that all nations can transit through international waters and airspace uninhabited and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his article “Why Has America Stopped Winning Wars,” Dominic Tierney incorrectly asserts that the United States is in a period of unwinnable wars and that, as such, the United States should plan for battlefield failure and “losing the right way. ”1 He uses multiple fallacies to build his argument, including appeals to emotion, appeals to questionable authority, explaining by naming, and searching for a perfect solution. This leads to the conclusion that the US position as a superpower is a weakness in terms of military engagement. This shortsighted position fails to encompass a holistic view that military engagements do not have to rise to the level of total victory to contribute to overall strategy.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Summary of the “Yes” The Department of Defense is a part of the executive branch of the United States government that deals with national security and the Armed Forces. In the Department of Defense there are three subordinate military departments: The Department of the Army, The Department of the Navy, and The Department of The Air Force. The DOD is planned to have a unique role in the comprehensive response effort for the Ebola outbreak as discussed by Michael Lumpkin during the Senate Appropriations Defense Subcommittee hearing on November 12th, 2014. He stated that these efforts are, “a national security priority in response to a global threat”.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foreign policy is an incredibly important part of any President’s role. Most countries in today’s society make use of global trade and international relationships to bolster the economy, and that is especially true for a superpower like the United States. Without a good foreign policy, not only will a country begin to fall behind in terms of technological advances, the citizens faith in the country will begin to falter. The foreign policy of the Barack Obama Administration has been scrutinized many a time, as it’s a multi-faceted issue with both pros and cons.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Looking back to 1860s and comparing it to the 2000s, we can still see how the role of the federal government, the benefits and drawbacks of economic growth, and the United States role in world affairs has been reoccurring, however, the…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people often forget the importance of our military. Some think we need a strong military and others think we need a small military. According to the Conservative’s handbook, Military strength deters aggression . If we have a strong military, it will imply that we can hold our ground and it will show other countries not to mess with us. (William Inboden, The Role of a Strong National Defense).…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. plays a fundamental role in the international order reinforcing, shaping and defining, and institutions around the world.7 (NSS, p.23) U.S. participation in numerous international partnerships, institutions, organizations and alliances establishes the foundation for a wide-range of global collaborations.8 (NSS, p.23) The plan stipulates continued participation in the United Nations (UN), while exhibiting adherence to multilateral treaties stressed by resource demands.9 (NSS, p.23) In rebalancing U.S. interests to the Asia-Pacific, multilateral nation-state involvement includes the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation (ASEAN) and participation in the Tran-Pacific Partnership (TPP) lowering trade barriers with Pacific Rim nations.10 (NSS, p.17) U.S. strategic intent includes: strengthening European Union (EU) relationships, offering an ambitious Transatlantic Trade Investment Partnership (T-TIP) and sustained participation in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), as well as recommitment to Article 5 membership support.11 (NSS p.25)…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the U.S. be involved in world affairs? The U.S. should be involved because the U.S. can do much to help the world. The U.S. has been involved in many world affairs previously; World War II, the Vietnam war, the Korean War, helping Haiti, and many other affairs of different varieties. These affairs brings people to wonder if the U.S should still be involved in world affairs due to what the U.S. has done in the past. However, evidence from the past affairs leaves me to believe that the U.S. should involve ourselves in the world affairs to, help stop terrorism, help the world operate peacefully, and continue to help other countries.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative Statement The current interventionist foreign policy that has driven the U.S. to accept an overwhelming amount of responsibility for maintaining the global order -- a commitment of such great magnitude that it should not be the burden of a single state, even a superpower such as the U.S. that “dominate[s] the world militarily, economically, and politically” (Posen 117). Emboldened by assumptions of American geopolitical strengths, the U.S. has pursued nation-building operations that serve as a detriment to both the federal budget and their international reputation. Instead, a return to the pre-WWII foreign policy of offshore balancing would reallocate resources from futile nation-building exercises towards preserving American dominance…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the section "The Power and the Glory: Myths of American Expectionalism" of the novel, Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Political Issues, Expanded (18th Edition) by George McKenna and Stanley Feingold discussed how the "American exceptionalism" has the capability whether by religious belief or righteousness to bring forth civilization to the world by brutality if necessary. John Winthrop referred to the Massachusetts Bay Colony as the "city upon a hill". Whereas, Ronald Reagan referred to the Massachusetts Bay Colony as a "shining city on a hill". Throughout time, religious belief has been invoked by the presidents of the United States. Every American leader didn't withhold a religious belief, but nevertheless the idea about using powers effectively continued on.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As part of the Homeland Security Assessment process, organizations strive to align their business plan with a Homeland Security Assessment by using the Baldridge Criteria model to “ensure that their performance excellence and security is competitive in the global marketplace which is one way that the Homeland Security Assessment process follows the Council on Competitiveness Business Model” (Fisher, 2004). “The Council on Competitiveness is a nonpartisan, non-profit organization whose members consist of corporate chief executives, university presidents, and labor leaders that are dedicated to setting an action agenda to drive the United States economic competitiveness by concentrating on a few critical issues, including national and regional…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A State of the Union address is a speech, mandated by the Constitution, given by the President of the United States to Congress, every January, in which the President outlines the country’s current status and its plans for the future (“The Definition of State of the Union”). On January 6, 1941, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, addressed the 77th Congress with his Four Freedoms Speech (Roosevelt). The purpose of this address was to outline the four indispensable human freedoms that America believes in, and to use them as a call to action of the American people, as America began to change its international foreign policy position from neutrality to an interventionist role as the United States began assist in the defense of other democratic…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since President George Washington’s Farewell Address, America had tried vigorously to keep a policy of isolationism in accordance to world affairs outside of trade; that is until October of 1945 when the United States officially became apart of the United Nations. No longer could America opt out of war or declare itself neutral, much like it did when World War II started in Europe. Many Americans opposed the idea of internationalism, but the U.S. had already dug itself into a deep hole it couldn’t get out of. The affairs of all the world were now the affairs of the U.S., changing the foreign policy permanently and emphasizing America’s role around the world. The change in policy wasn’t immediate, but gradual starting with the end of the…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To substantiate his pathetic goal, President Roosevelt uses multiple logical methods in his address. He focuses on how the US is strong enough to hold its own borders against the world and how it has a duty to help defend the nation’s foreign…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The lack of major U.S. presence in international economic issues causes many nations to collapse as well. The continent of Africa is the center of gravity for these failed states and radical groups.2 Major powers, such as China, are problematic as they aggressively claim areas surrounded their country. The United States focused on itself for the last decade and a half, but now faces the realities of looming national security threats from both state and non-state actors. The United States needs to refocus itself on the myriad of potential attacks that could endanger the country, including Iran and North Korea’s nuclear capabilities, terrorist attacks, cyber-attacks, and China’s strategy concerning aggressive land claims. The United States saw a departure from its role as “global policeman” with the election of…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    How exactly does illegal immigration affect America? Should the policies be more stringent? These are frequently asked questions by most people, especially with the recent presidential candidates proposing their ideas for office. Many people migrate to America in hopes of a better living and more job opportunities. However, immigrants do not see the impact created in the country upon illegal entry, which not only weakens the value of our national security system, but has also created a large financial drain on the economy.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays