Golf Negligence Case Study

Improved Essays
When injuries occur, the golf course can be held liable under negligence. Injuries on the golf course can result from being hit by an errand ball, injuries from golf carts and other injuries associated with the use of the golf course. A plaintiff who intends to bring a lawsuit against a golf course can rely on negligence in design or management. It is common for shots to go astray from the intended targets and this risk must be accepted by anyone going to the golf course. Golfers assume the risk of injury arising from the negligence of another player. A golfer can be held liable for the injury to the other player only if he acted recklessly. The doctrine of assumption of risk may bar a plaintiff from recovering for injuries if it can be shown …show more content…
There is a duty to manage and design the golf course such that there is minimal risk to its users. The duty to safe design includes the alignment and separation of fairway, greens and tees in the property. It also includes protecting areas where there is the greatest danger of being hit with golf balls. Every part of the golf course should be safe but the golf course cannot assume that all the spectators take the risk of standing in unsafe areas if there are no signages or warning about the risk. It is important for the golf course to put signs that will allow the users of the golf course to stand in areas where there is protection from errant golf balls. Apart from liability from the use of the course, a golf course can also incur liability from the use of golf carts. Risk arising from the use of golf carts can be due to the negligent design of the carts or negligent …show more content…
Responsibility for product defects lies with the sellers. The law requires that the products meet some basic expectations by the customer. When there is an unexpected defect in a product, the product does not meet the ordinary expectations of the customer and can result in product liability claims. For a successful product liability case, the plaintiff must show that the product that caused the injury or damage was defective and the defect made the product unreasonably dangerous. Defects can take the form of design defects, manufacturing defects or marketing defect s. Design defects affect the product before it is even produced and can make the product inherently unsafe. Manufacturing defects occurs at the manufacturing or processing stages while marketing defects are flaws in the way the products are marketed and includes insufficient instructions, inadequate warnings and improper

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Unit 3 P1 Bungburys

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A warranty is an assurance in the contract. It is assurance form the seller to the buyer of products, or services. This means if a product is sold it will have a warranty, meaning if it breaks the customer may have a refund or this product exchanged. The business should be aware of these and stick to product warranties as failure to do so means you are breaching a contract and normal procedures can follow from this contract breach. What happens in breaches of contracts?…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Maussner v Atlantic City Country Club 691 A.2d 826 (1997) Facts of case- The plaintiff (golfer) was playing golf with his friends, but then it started to rain and not just raining but thundering as well. He and his friends were making their way back to the golf course when the plaintiff and his friend got struck by lightning on the defendant’s (golf course owner and operators). The plaintiff and the friend managed to live, but the plaintiff was left with serious injuries. The plaintiff then proceeded to sue the owner of the golf course for negligence because the golf course had no shelters for him to take cover, the safety procedures for thunderstorms were put up after the defendant got struck by lightning as well as there were no devices…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harco Case Study

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The witness was a passenger on the upper deck and was struck in the face by a tree branch sustaining a disfiguring facial injury. The witness tried the case against the insured and was awarded a verdict of $3,515,986 (claim # 22717*2013*16). Based on the events of this loss, the plaintiff’s counsel will argue, the insured had prior notice and failed in their duty to warn their passengers of the hazardous condition. The other issues that were detrimental to the insured’s defense, was the safety manager’s testimony; who acknowledged, the insured’s maintenance department was directed to post warning signs on the bus, however, this was never…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To prove negligence in a tort case, Bukowski had to show the four elements of negligence: Standard of care, breach of duty, causation, and injury. Standard of care consists of the sport entity (Clarkson University’s baseball coach) to provide a safe environment for those under their care. Bukowski claimed that the environment he was participating in was not safe for multiple reasons. He claimed the backdrop for the pitcher was multi-colored, which made it difficult to see the ball coming at him.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Causing or allowing to exist a dangerous condition on the grounds; c. Failing to warn of a dangerous condition for which Congden and Maple knew or should have known existed on the grounds; d. Failing to use the care and caution that a reasonably prudent person would in the circumstances then and there existing. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants’ acts and/or omissions, the Plaintiff has suffered injuries and damages as set forth above, all of which are in direct violation of the common law and Statutes of the State of South Carolina. 15. Ameche is therefore informed and believes that he is entitled to judgment against Congden and Maple for actual and general damages as well as punitive damages. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Carl Ameche, prays for judgment against the Defendants, Margie Congden, Leroy Congden, and Maple Meadows Campground, for actual, consequential, special, and punitive damages in an amount to be determined by a jury, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Products that have defects and cause harm to a consumer of the…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will discuss liability and negligence in the healthcare field as well as negligence issue in the healthcare field. Liability is defined as a potential for a lawsuit (Dunn 114). Liability can be found just about anywhere and is a concerning area in today’s age. Healthcare workers are very familiar to this word and been familiarized throughout their careers with this word. I can’t be a scary thing to think about in this field the potential to be sued from an employee level all the way to a corporate level.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A young child’s infringement of a statute proposed to control the circumstance which delivered damage is in many states held not to constitute negligence in essence or even, in a considerable lot of those which perceive a decisive assumption of inadequacy for negligence in exceptionally youthful kids, allowable proof of carelessness. Where an infringement is allowed to be considered as a major aspect of the confirmation bearing on the subject of contributory negligence, the youngster's obligation to comply with the statute is much of the time held not to be outright, but rather just to constitute such consistence as would commonly be anticipated from children of a similar age, knowledge and involvement in similar conditions. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the law expresses that the time of criminal obligation is 10 years. That acquaints a lawful civil argument as with regardless of whether a youngster would ever be liable of…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sports law is relevant to the administration of sports and a person’s participation in sport whether they play at amateur, professional or international level. The legal issues that arise from a sporting activity can involve aspects of contract law, torts, anti-discrimination, trade practice and criminal law The most common procedure involves breaches of the rules of the game that are contrary to the principles of the game that are seen as being against the morals of sportsmanship. From this point this is able to be dealt with by the governing bodies through possibly being sent to a tribunal and then Governing bodies Most commonly it can be seen that parliament does not make law regarding sports as a result they leave the decision to…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Question 1 Area of the Tort law: Negligence Liability Material Facts: Benji v Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club, Jack and Bronco (Personal Injury- Head)/ Negligence act. Benji (Plaintiff), a first grade league player of Western Tigers Rugby League Football Club was severely injured following a spear tackle by Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club’s (first defendant) players Jack and Bronco (second and third defendants). Benji was therefore forced into career retirement at his peak due to negligent acts of the defendant. Subsequently, National Rugby League charged the second and third defendant with having made a dangerous throw, to which they pleaded guilty. Issues: The most pertinent issue at hand is the fact that whether the defendants…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    players do not wear protective gear because the chances of getting hit with the ball are low. Mr. Embry’s did not assume a higher risk when he decided to retrieve the ball. Ms. Weiss, the instructor, told Mr. Mitchell that he should alert his playing partners that he had a shanking problem so they should remain behind him while he was hitting the ball. Also, Mitchell did not inform the group that he intended to hit a second ball from a tee box. These rules are there to prevent players from being injures.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The carpet is a foreseeable factor as the walkway can have these wrinkles. Furthermore, under Judge Andrew’s dissenting opinion, Myra can be part of the “any” consequences that naturally flow from defendant’s conduct. Thus, Myra may claim her proximate causation is satisfied. Plaintiff must prove actual damages for there to be negligence claim. Otherwise, there can be no negligence claim.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intentional Torts

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chapter thirteen outlines negligence and intentional torts. Negligence is and unintentional tort. There are two types of negligence cases, which are contributory negligence and comparative negligence. Contributory negligence is if the plaintiff was at any fault, one cannot sue. Comparative negligence is compared contribution to the crime.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Negligence Tort Case Study

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence occurs when a particular person fails to perform a duty that they are entitled to perform. According to laws.com, there are four things that must occur in or-der for a tort to be a negligence tort, “a person must owe a duty or service to the victim in question; the individual who owes the duty must violate the promise or obligation; an injury then must arise because of that specific violation; and the injury causes must have been reasonably foreseeable as a result of the person’s negligent actions. (laws.com)” The decision in the case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California, demonstrates these four qualifying factors, therefore making it a negligence tort case.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays