I do believe him to be quite a pessimistic guy in terms of his hopes for society. I myself hold high expectations for the future and, I advocate the possibility of having an idealistic and utopian society (for the knowledge of the readers I have made up this word utopian and it means a good place). I can only imagine that everyone wants to be in a good place. A place where everyone is equal and nothing more, but that seems to not be the case with Niccolo Machiavelli. I will admit though he seems to have a more realistic grasp on what society looks like, I fear with such low expectations how can we expect society to rise up if we can’t even see the night sky. We both seem to agree upon the basic standard of which life is built on, that men are born inevitably evil. That said I do believe there to be a possibility for us to overcome this barrier that runs deep within our blood and, put it aside and create a new society where it no longer …show more content…
In this regard I find Baldassare Castiglione to be disruptive to the progression of society in the terms of equality. This man who dares to write books writes nonsense about how women should be left uneducated. It is in my earnest effects to harness some sense of equality. I had my daughters get an education and even taught my wife. Baldassare Castiglione says that the appearance of a lady matters a lot. To that, I say pish posh I myself married the eldest daughter over the offered considerably more beautiful second daughter but, I ended up marrying the eldest out of pity and, have since bare four children with her. Interestingly enough we both worked for King Henry the Eighth so it may be plausible that our paths had crossed and, it seems to be such a small